From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
tangmeng <tangmeng@uniontech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] riscv: sbi: Switch to the sys-off handler API
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 18:30:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6yLMwhSypqp5+Ir@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221228161915.13194-1-samuel@sholland.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1355 bytes --]
Hey Samuel,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:19:12AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> I want to convert the axp20x PMIC poweroff handler to use the sys-off
> API, so it can be used as a fallback for if the SBI poweroff handler
> is unavailable. But the SBI poweroff handler still uses pm_power_off, so
> done alone, this would cause the axp20x callback to be called first,
> before the SBI poweroff handler has a chance to run.
>
> In order to prevent this change in behavior, the SBI poweroff handler
> needs to be converted to the sys-off API first, at a higher priority.
>
> This series performs the conversion, after accounting for the fact that
> the SBI poweroff handler is registered quite early during boot.
>
> The first patch is a dependency for both this series and the PSCI
> series[1], so I would like to get at least patch 1 merged soon.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221105214841.7828-1-samuel@sholland.org/
>
>
> Samuel Holland (3):
> kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any priority
> riscv: sbi: Share the code for unsupported extension warnings
> riscv: sbi: Switch to the sys-off handler API
Not what other stuff has reboot support, so I gave it a whirl on
PolarFire SoC & it seemed to work as expected:
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Thanks,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
tangmeng <tangmeng@uniontech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] riscv: sbi: Switch to the sys-off handler API
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 18:30:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6yLMwhSypqp5+Ir@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221228161915.13194-1-samuel@sholland.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1355 bytes --]
Hey Samuel,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 10:19:12AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> I want to convert the axp20x PMIC poweroff handler to use the sys-off
> API, so it can be used as a fallback for if the SBI poweroff handler
> is unavailable. But the SBI poweroff handler still uses pm_power_off, so
> done alone, this would cause the axp20x callback to be called first,
> before the SBI poweroff handler has a chance to run.
>
> In order to prevent this change in behavior, the SBI poweroff handler
> needs to be converted to the sys-off API first, at a higher priority.
>
> This series performs the conversion, after accounting for the fact that
> the SBI poweroff handler is registered quite early during boot.
>
> The first patch is a dependency for both this series and the PSCI
> series[1], so I would like to get at least patch 1 merged soon.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221105214841.7828-1-samuel@sholland.org/
>
>
> Samuel Holland (3):
> kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any priority
> riscv: sbi: Share the code for unsupported extension warnings
> riscv: sbi: Switch to the sys-off handler API
Not what other stuff has reboot support, so I gave it a whirl on
PolarFire SoC & it seemed to work as expected:
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Thanks,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-28 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-28 16:19 [PATCH 0/3] riscv: sbi: Switch to the sys-off handler API Samuel Holland
2022-12-28 16:19 ` Samuel Holland
2022-12-28 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel/reboot: Use the static sys-off handler for any priority Samuel Holland
2022-12-28 16:19 ` Samuel Holland
2023-02-15 0:17 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-15 0:17 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-18 23:20 ` Samuel Holland
2023-02-18 23:20 ` Samuel Holland
2023-02-18 23:32 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2023-02-18 23:32 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2023-03-15 3:10 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-15 3:10 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-12-28 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] riscv: sbi: Share the code for unsupported extension warnings Samuel Holland
2022-12-28 16:19 ` Samuel Holland
2023-01-03 8:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-03 8:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-28 16:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] riscv: sbi: Switch to the sys-off handler API Samuel Holland
2022-12-28 16:19 ` Samuel Holland
2022-12-28 18:30 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-12-28 18:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Conor Dooley
2023-01-03 10:54 ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-03 10:54 ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-12 21:50 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-12 21:50 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-12 21:51 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-12 21:51 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-11 20:53 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-05-11 20:53 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6yLMwhSypqp5+Ir@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=tangmeng@uniontech.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.