All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>, Tom Rix <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] bitops: always define asm-generic non-atomic bitops
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 19:24:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7MTTtlDCottjQi1@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230102163059.3556962-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>

On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:30:59PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 17:14:31 +0100
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 02:13:06PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:

> > this patch gives me a headache when trying to run sparse against a module.

No, it's not related to this patch.

> > Olek please help :D
> 
> It was fixed shortly after the build bots turned on on the original
> series with [0]. Hovewer, no release tag's been made after the fix.
> There's also a short discussion regarding packaging Sparse 0.6.4 for
> Debian with that fix cherry-picked[1], not sure if it led anywhere.

Debian already fixed that for a few weeks at least.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] bitops: always define asm-generic non-atomic bitops
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 19:24:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7MTTtlDCottjQi1@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230102163059.3556962-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>

On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:30:59PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 17:14:31 +0100
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 02:13:06PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:

> > this patch gives me a headache when trying to run sparse against a module.

No, it's not related to this patch.

> > Olek please help :D
> 
> It was fixed shortly after the build bots turned on on the original
> series with [0]. Hovewer, no release tag's been made after the fix.
> There's also a short discussion regarding packaging Sparse 0.6.4 for
> Debian with that fix cherry-picked[1], not sure if it led anywhere.

Debian already fixed that for a few weeks at least.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] bitops: always define asm-generic non-atomic bitops
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 17:24:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7MTTtlDCottjQi1@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230102163059.3556962-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>

On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:30:59PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 17:14:31 +0100
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 02:13:06PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:

> > this patch gives me a headache when trying to run sparse against a module.

No, it's not related to this patch.

> > Olek please help :D
> 
> It was fixed shortly after the build bots turned on on the original
> series with [0]. Hovewer, no release tag's been made after the fix.
> There's also a short discussion regarding packaging Sparse 0.6.4 for
> Debian with that fix cherry-picked[1], not sure if it led anywhere.

Debian already fixed that for a few weeks at least.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-02 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-24 12:13 [PATCH v5 0/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] ia64, processor: fix -Wincompatible-pointer-types in ia64_get_irr() Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] bitops: always define asm-generic non-atomic bitops Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-01-02 16:14   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-01-02 16:14     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-01-02 16:14     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-01-02 16:30     ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-01-02 16:30       ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-01-02 16:30       ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-01-02 17:24       ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-01-02 17:24         ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-01-02 17:24         ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] bitops: unify non-atomic bitops prototypes across architectures Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-06 10:09   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-06 10:09     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-06 10:09     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] bitops: define const_*() versions of the non-atomics Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] bitops: wrap non-atomic bitops with a transparent macro Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15  0:04   ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15  0:04     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15  0:04     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15 13:26     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15 13:26       ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15 13:26       ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15 13:49       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15 13:49         ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15 13:49         ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15 14:19         ` Yury Norov
2022-07-15 14:19           ` Yury Norov
2022-07-15 14:19           ` Yury Norov
2022-07-15 14:50           ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15 14:50             ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15 14:50             ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] net/ice: fix initializing the bitmap in the switch code Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] bitmap: don't assume compiler evaluates small mem*() builtins calls Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] lib: test_bitmap: add compile-time optimization/evaluations assertions Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Borislav Petkov
2022-06-24 12:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-24 12:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-30 16:56 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-30 16:56   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-30 16:56   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-01  2:58   ` Yury Norov
2022-07-01  2:58     ` Yury Norov
2022-07-01  2:58     ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7MTTtlDCottjQi1@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcain@quicinc.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.