From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@muhq.space>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@intel.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu: Fix aarch64 build
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:43:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y90rtA95mWW5Othk@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y90di+N7TODkFvMV@kernel.org>
Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:43:23AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:36:30AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:35:29AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:17:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:41:22PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:40 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ARM64 overrides a weak function but a previous change had broken the
> > > > > > build.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table")
> > > > >
> > > > > As 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table") is
> > > > > only on tmp.perf/core then it may be best to just squash this fix into
> > > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, that was my intention, I'll fold it there to keep bisection,
> > > > thanks for fixing it so fast, I'll double check on my rk3399 board and
> > > > on again on the cross-build container.
> > >
> > > Nope, that is not what I reported yesterday, trying to build it on the
> > > rk3399 board:
> >
> > Sorry, pulled the trigger too soon, this is _before_ applying your fix,
> > I should't multitask too much :-\
> >
> > I'll double check now,
>
> Ok, now it is exploding at:
>
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c: In function ‘decompress’:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3598:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_name’
> 3598 | pe->metric_name = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3600:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_group’
> 3600 | pe->metric_group = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3614:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_constraint’
> 3614 | pe->metric_constraint = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3616:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_expr’
> 3616 | pe->metric_expr = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c: At top level:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3637:32: error: no previous prototype for ‘perf_pmu__find_table’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> 3637 | const struct pmu_events_table *perf_pmu__find_table(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:98: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:676: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o] Error 2
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-ftrace.o
I tried bisecting, but at this cset:
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ git log --oneline -1
d22e569cd33d (HEAD) perf pmu-events: Separate the metrics from events for no jevents
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$
I'm getting this:
CC /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o
pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3637:32: error: no previous prototype for ‘perf_pmu__find_table’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
3637 | const struct pmu_events_table *perf_pmu__find_table(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-ftrace.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-help.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-buildid-list.o
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:676: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-buildid-cache.o
<SNIP>
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/attr.o
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu_events_table__find’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:35:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘perf_pmu__find_table’; did you mean ‘perf_pmu__find_by_type’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
35 | return perf_pmu__find_table(pmu);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| perf_pmu__find_by_type
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:35:24: error: returning ‘int’ from a function with return type ‘const struct pmu_events_table *’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
35 | return perf_pmu__find_table(pmu);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[6]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /tmp/build/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: util] Error 2
make[4]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arm64] Error 2
make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arch] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.o
-----
I'm building with:
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ alias m
alias m='make -k BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1 CORESIGHT=1 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin && git status && perf test python'
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ rm -rf /tmp/build/$(basename $(pwd)) ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/$(basename $(pwd)) ; m
To then go back to:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3616:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_expr’
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@muhq.space>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.y an@linaro.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu: Fix aarch64 build
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:43:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y90rtA95mWW5Othk@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y90di+N7TODkFvMV@kernel.org>
Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:43:23AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:36:30AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:35:29AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:17:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:41:22PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:40 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ARM64 overrides a weak function but a previous change had broken the
> > > > > > build.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table")
> > > > >
> > > > > As 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table") is
> > > > > only on tmp.perf/core then it may be best to just squash this fix into
> > > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, that was my intention, I'll fold it there to keep bisection,
> > > > thanks for fixing it so fast, I'll double check on my rk3399 board and
> > > > on again on the cross-build container.
> > >
> > > Nope, that is not what I reported yesterday, trying to build it on the
> > > rk3399 board:
> >
> > Sorry, pulled the trigger too soon, this is _before_ applying your fix,
> > I should't multitask too much :-\
> >
> > I'll double check now,
>
> Ok, now it is exploding at:
>
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c: In function ‘decompress’:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3598:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_name’
> 3598 | pe->metric_name = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3600:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_group’
> 3600 | pe->metric_group = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3614:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_constraint’
> 3614 | pe->metric_constraint = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3616:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_expr’
> 3616 | pe->metric_expr = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c: At top level:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3637:32: error: no previous prototype for ‘perf_pmu__find_table’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> 3637 | const struct pmu_events_table *perf_pmu__find_table(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:98: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:676: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o] Error 2
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-ftrace.o
I tried bisecting, but at this cset:
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ git log --oneline -1
d22e569cd33d (HEAD) perf pmu-events: Separate the metrics from events for no jevents
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$
I'm getting this:
CC /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o
pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3637:32: error: no previous prototype for ‘perf_pmu__find_table’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
3637 | const struct pmu_events_table *perf_pmu__find_table(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-ftrace.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-help.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-buildid-list.o
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:676: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-buildid-cache.o
<SNIP>
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/attr.o
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu_events_table__find’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:35:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘perf_pmu__find_table’; did you mean ‘perf_pmu__find_by_type’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
35 | return perf_pmu__find_table(pmu);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| perf_pmu__find_by_type
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:35:24: error: returning ‘int’ from a function with return type ‘const struct pmu_events_table *’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
35 | return perf_pmu__find_table(pmu);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[6]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /tmp/build/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: util] Error 2
make[4]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arm64] Error 2
make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arch] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.o
-----
I'm building with:
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ alias m
alias m='make -k BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1 CORESIGHT=1 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin && git status && perf test python'
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ rm -rf /tmp/build/$(basename $(pwd)) ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/$(basename $(pwd)) ; m
To then go back to:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3616:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_expr’
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@muhq.space>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@intel.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu: Fix aarch64 build
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:43:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y90rtA95mWW5Othk@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y90di+N7TODkFvMV@kernel.org>
Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:43:23AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:36:30AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:35:29AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:17:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:41:22PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:40 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ARM64 overrides a weak function but a previous change had broken the
> > > > > > build.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table")
> > > > >
> > > > > As 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table") is
> > > > > only on tmp.perf/core then it may be best to just squash this fix into
> > > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, that was my intention, I'll fold it there to keep bisection,
> > > > thanks for fixing it so fast, I'll double check on my rk3399 board and
> > > > on again on the cross-build container.
> > >
> > > Nope, that is not what I reported yesterday, trying to build it on the
> > > rk3399 board:
> >
> > Sorry, pulled the trigger too soon, this is _before_ applying your fix,
> > I should't multitask too much :-\
> >
> > I'll double check now,
>
> Ok, now it is exploding at:
>
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c: In function ‘decompress’:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3598:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_name’
> 3598 | pe->metric_name = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3600:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_group’
> 3600 | pe->metric_group = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3614:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_constraint’
> 3614 | pe->metric_constraint = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3616:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_expr’
> 3616 | pe->metric_expr = (*p == '\0' ? NULL : p);
> | ^~
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c: At top level:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3637:32: error: no previous prototype for ‘perf_pmu__find_table’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> 3637 | const struct pmu_events_table *perf_pmu__find_table(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:98: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:676: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o] Error 2
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-ftrace.o
I tried bisecting, but at this cset:
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ git log --oneline -1
d22e569cd33d (HEAD) perf pmu-events: Separate the metrics from events for no jevents
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$
I'm getting this:
CC /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o
pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3637:32: error: no previous prototype for ‘perf_pmu__find_table’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
3637 | const struct pmu_events_table *perf_pmu__find_table(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-ftrace.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-help.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-buildid-list.o
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:676: /tmp/build/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC /tmp/build/perf/builtin-buildid-cache.o
<SNIP>
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/attr.o
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu_events_table__find’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:35:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘perf_pmu__find_table’; did you mean ‘perf_pmu__find_by_type’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
35 | return perf_pmu__find_table(pmu);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| perf_pmu__find_by_type
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:35:24: error: returning ‘int’ from a function with return type ‘const struct pmu_events_table *’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
35 | return perf_pmu__find_table(pmu);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[6]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /tmp/build/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: util] Error 2
make[4]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arm64] Error 2
make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arch] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC /tmp/build/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.o
-----
I'm building with:
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ alias m
alias m='make -k BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1 CORESIGHT=1 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin && git status && perf test python'
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ rm -rf /tmp/build/$(basename $(pwd)) ; mkdir -p /tmp/build/$(basename $(pwd)) ; m
To then go back to:
> pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3616:11: error: ‘struct pmu_event’ has no member named ‘metric_expr’
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-03 1:40 [PATCH v1] perf pmu: Fix aarch64 build Ian Rogers
2023-02-03 1:40 ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-03 1:40 ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-03 1:41 ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-03 1:41 ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-03 1:41 ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-03 14:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 15:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-02-03 15:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 15:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 16:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 16:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 16:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 16:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 16:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 16:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-04 21:23 ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-04 21:23 ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-04 21:23 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y90rtA95mWW5Othk@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=caleb.biggers@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=florian.fischer@muhq.space \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=perry.taylor@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=tegongkang@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.