From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: scmi: Allow for zero voltage domains
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:03:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9L4nplArbRMP9DK@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9LInDhFoVkWMe7d@sirena.org.uk>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:38:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:05:11PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > SCMI Voltage protocol allows the platform to report no voltage domains
> > on discovery, while warning the user about such an odd configuration.
>
> This patch removes all diagnostics in this case?
You'll still see a warning from the SCMI core Voltage Protocol saying:
"No Voltage domains found."
but nothing from the regulator driver itself which will successfully probe,
albeit not creating any regulators...if this is what you mean.
Thanks for having a look,
Cristian
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: scmi: Allow for zero voltage domains
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:03:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9L4nplArbRMP9DK@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9LInDhFoVkWMe7d@sirena.org.uk>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:38:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:05:11PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > SCMI Voltage protocol allows the platform to report no voltage domains
> > on discovery, while warning the user about such an odd configuration.
>
> This patch removes all diagnostics in this case?
You'll still see a warning from the SCMI core Voltage Protocol saying:
"No Voltage domains found."
but nothing from the regulator driver itself which will successfully probe,
albeit not creating any regulators...if this is what you mean.
Thanks for having a look,
Cristian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-26 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-26 18:05 [PATCH] regulator: scmi: Allow for zero voltage domains Cristian Marussi
2023-01-26 18:05 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-01-26 18:38 ` Mark Brown
2023-01-26 18:38 ` Mark Brown
2023-01-26 22:03 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2023-01-26 22:03 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-01-27 0:53 ` Mark Brown
2023-01-27 0:53 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9L4nplArbRMP9DK@pluto \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.