All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: John Hickey <jjh@daedalian.us>
Cc: <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Shujin Li <lishujin@kuaishou.com>,
	Jason Xing <xingwanli@kuaishou.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ixgbe: Panic during XDP_TX with > 64 CPUs
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:50:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9q0YDLVO+ndlaa8@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230131073815.181341-1-jjh@daedalian.us>

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:38:15PM -0800, John Hickey wrote:
> In commit 'ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus'
> (4fe815850bdc), support was added to allow XDP programs to run on systems
> with more than 64 CPUs by locking the XDP TX rings and indexing them
> using cpu % 64 (IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS).
> 
> Upon trying this out patch via the Intel 5.18.6 out of tree driver
> on a system with more than 64 cores, the kernel paniced with an
> array-index-out-of-bounds at the return in ixgbe_determine_xdp_ring in
> ixgbe.h, which means ixgbe_determine_xdp_q_idx was just returning the
> cpu instead of cpu % IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS.

I'd like to ask you to include the splat you got in the commit message.

> 
> I think this is how it happens:
> 
> Upon loading the first XDP program on a system with more than 64 CPUs,
> ixgbe_xdp_locking_key is incremented in ixgbe_xdp_setup.  However,
> immediately after this, the rings are reconfigured by ixgbe_setup_tc.
> ixgbe_setup_tc calls ixgbe_clear_interrupt_scheme which calls
> ixgbe_free_q_vectors which calls ixgbe_free_q_vector in a loop.
> ixgbe_free_q_vector decrements ixgbe_xdp_locking_key once per call if
> it is non-zero.  Commenting out the decrement in ixgbe_free_q_vector
> stopped my system from panicing.
> 
> I suspect to make the original patch work, I would need to load an XDP
> program and then replace it in order to get ixgbe_xdp_locking_key back
> above 0 since ixgbe_setup_tc is only called when transitioning between
> XDP and non-XDP ring configurations, while ixgbe_xdp_locking_key is
> incremented every time ixgbe_xdp_setup is called.
> 
> Also, ixgbe_setup_tc can be called via ethtool --set-channels, so this
> becomes another path to decrement ixgbe_xdp_locking_key to 0 on systems
> with greater than 64 CPUs.
> 
> For this patch, I have changed static_branch_inc to static_branch_enable
> in ixgbe_setup_xdp.  We aren't counting references and I don't see any
> reason to turn it off, since all the locking appears to be in the XDP_TX
> path, which isn't run if a XDP program isn't loaded.
> 
> Fixes: 4fe815850bdc ("ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus")
> Signed-off-by: John Hickey <jjh@daedalian.us>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> 	Added Fixes and net tag.  No code changes.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c  | 3 ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> index f8156fe4b1dc..0ee943db3dc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> @@ -1035,9 +1035,6 @@ static void ixgbe_free_q_vector(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, int v_idx)
>  	adapter->q_vector[v_idx] = NULL;
>  	__netif_napi_del(&q_vector->napi);
>  
> -	if (static_key_enabled(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key))
> -		static_branch_dec(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);

Yeah calling this per each qvector is *very* unbalanced approach whereas
you bump it single time when loading xdp prog.

> -
>  	/*
>  	 * after a call to __netif_napi_del() napi may still be used and
>  	 * ixgbe_get_stats64() might access the rings on this vector,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index ab8370c413f3..cd2fb72c67be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -10283,7 +10283,7 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	if (nr_cpu_ids > IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS * 2)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	else if (nr_cpu_ids > IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS)
> -		static_branch_inc(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);
> +		static_branch_enable(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);

Now that you removed static_branch_dec you probably need a counter part
(static_branch_disable) at appriopriate place.

>  
>  	old_prog = xchg(&adapter->xdp_prog, prog);
>  	need_reset = (!!prog != !!old_prog);
> -- 
> 2.37.2
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: John Hickey <jjh@daedalian.us>
Cc: Shujin Li <lishujin@kuaishou.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing <xingwanli@kuaishou.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] ixgbe: Panic during XDP_TX with > 64 CPUs
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:50:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9q0YDLVO+ndlaa8@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230131073815.181341-1-jjh@daedalian.us>

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:38:15PM -0800, John Hickey wrote:
> In commit 'ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus'
> (4fe815850bdc), support was added to allow XDP programs to run on systems
> with more than 64 CPUs by locking the XDP TX rings and indexing them
> using cpu % 64 (IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS).
> 
> Upon trying this out patch via the Intel 5.18.6 out of tree driver
> on a system with more than 64 cores, the kernel paniced with an
> array-index-out-of-bounds at the return in ixgbe_determine_xdp_ring in
> ixgbe.h, which means ixgbe_determine_xdp_q_idx was just returning the
> cpu instead of cpu % IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS.

I'd like to ask you to include the splat you got in the commit message.

> 
> I think this is how it happens:
> 
> Upon loading the first XDP program on a system with more than 64 CPUs,
> ixgbe_xdp_locking_key is incremented in ixgbe_xdp_setup.  However,
> immediately after this, the rings are reconfigured by ixgbe_setup_tc.
> ixgbe_setup_tc calls ixgbe_clear_interrupt_scheme which calls
> ixgbe_free_q_vectors which calls ixgbe_free_q_vector in a loop.
> ixgbe_free_q_vector decrements ixgbe_xdp_locking_key once per call if
> it is non-zero.  Commenting out the decrement in ixgbe_free_q_vector
> stopped my system from panicing.
> 
> I suspect to make the original patch work, I would need to load an XDP
> program and then replace it in order to get ixgbe_xdp_locking_key back
> above 0 since ixgbe_setup_tc is only called when transitioning between
> XDP and non-XDP ring configurations, while ixgbe_xdp_locking_key is
> incremented every time ixgbe_xdp_setup is called.
> 
> Also, ixgbe_setup_tc can be called via ethtool --set-channels, so this
> becomes another path to decrement ixgbe_xdp_locking_key to 0 on systems
> with greater than 64 CPUs.
> 
> For this patch, I have changed static_branch_inc to static_branch_enable
> in ixgbe_setup_xdp.  We aren't counting references and I don't see any
> reason to turn it off, since all the locking appears to be in the XDP_TX
> path, which isn't run if a XDP program isn't loaded.
> 
> Fixes: 4fe815850bdc ("ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus")
> Signed-off-by: John Hickey <jjh@daedalian.us>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> 	Added Fixes and net tag.  No code changes.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c  | 3 ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> index f8156fe4b1dc..0ee943db3dc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> @@ -1035,9 +1035,6 @@ static void ixgbe_free_q_vector(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, int v_idx)
>  	adapter->q_vector[v_idx] = NULL;
>  	__netif_napi_del(&q_vector->napi);
>  
> -	if (static_key_enabled(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key))
> -		static_branch_dec(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);

Yeah calling this per each qvector is *very* unbalanced approach whereas
you bump it single time when loading xdp prog.

> -
>  	/*
>  	 * after a call to __netif_napi_del() napi may still be used and
>  	 * ixgbe_get_stats64() might access the rings on this vector,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index ab8370c413f3..cd2fb72c67be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -10283,7 +10283,7 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	if (nr_cpu_ids > IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS * 2)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	else if (nr_cpu_ids > IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS)
> -		static_branch_inc(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);
> +		static_branch_enable(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);

Now that you removed static_branch_dec you probably need a counter part
(static_branch_disable) at appriopriate place.

>  
>  	old_prog = xchg(&adapter->xdp_prog, prog);
>  	need_reset = (!!prog != !!old_prog);
> -- 
> 2.37.2
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-01 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-31  7:38 [PATCH net v2] ixgbe: Panic during XDP_TX with > 64 CPUs John Hickey
2023-01-31  7:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " John Hickey
2023-02-01 18:50 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2023-02-01 18:50   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-02-02  1:23   ` John Hickey
2023-02-02  1:23     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " John Hickey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9q0YDLVO+ndlaa8@boxer \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jjh@daedalian.us \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lishujin@kuaishou.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=xingwanli@kuaishou.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.