From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Sam McNally <sammc@chromium.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm_dp_mst_topology: use correct AUX channel
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 15:24:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YB1HBDEB5/fefQzi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJqEsoCOJmS5aVb5du09tXUi7UUKVBQDPe5KTdcBiDr8A7kSYA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:17:51PM +1100, Sam McNally wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 21:19, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/02/2021 23:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:13:53PM +1000, Sam McNally wrote:
> > >> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> > >>
> > >> For adapters behind an MST hub use the correct AUX channel.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> > >> [sammc@chromium.org: rebased, removing redundant changes]
> > >> Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc@chromium.org>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> (no changes since v1)
> > >>
> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > >> index 15b6cc39a754..0d753201adbd 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > >> @@ -2255,6 +2255,9 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_unlink_port(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > >> drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static ssize_t
> > >> +drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg);
> > >> +
> > >> static struct drm_dp_mst_port *
> > >> drm_dp_mst_add_port(struct drm_device *dev,
> > >> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > >> @@ -2271,9 +2274,13 @@ drm_dp_mst_add_port(struct drm_device *dev,
> > >> port->port_num = port_number;
> > >> port->mgr = mgr;
> > >> port->aux.name = "DPMST";
> > >> + mutex_init(&port->aux.hw_mutex);
> > >> + mutex_init(&port->aux.cec.lock);
> > >> port->aux.dev = dev->dev;
> > >> port->aux.is_remote = true;
> > >>
> > >> + port->aux.transfer = drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer;
> > >> +
> > >
> > > This was supposed to be handled via higher levels checking for
> > > is_remote==true.
> >
> > Ah, I suspect this patch can be dropped entirely: it predates commit 2f221a5efed4
> > ("drm/dp_mst: Add MST support to DP DPCD R/W functions").
> >
> > It looks like that commit basically solved what this older patch attempts to do
> > as well.
> >
> > Sam, can you test if it works without this patch?
>
> It almost just works; drm_dp_cec uses whether aux.transfer is non-null
> to filter out non-DP connectors. Using aux.is_remote as another signal
> indicating a DP connector seems plausible. We can drop this patch.
Why would anyone even call this stuff on a non-DP connector?
And where did they even get the struct drm_dp_aux to do so?
> Thanks all!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > >
> > >> /* initialize the MST downstream port's AUX crc work queue */
> > >> drm_dp_remote_aux_init(&port->aux);
> > >>
> > >> @@ -3503,6 +3510,35 @@ static int drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > >> return 0;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static ssize_t
> > >> +drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> > >> +{
> > >> + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port =
> > >> + container_of(aux, struct drm_dp_mst_port, aux);
> > >> + int ret;
> > >> +
> > >> + switch (msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) {
> > >> + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE:
> > >> + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE:
> > >> + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE:
> > >> + ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(port->mgr, port, msg->address,
> > >> + msg->size, msg->buffer);
> > >
> > > That doesn't make sense to me. I2c writes and DPCD writes
> > > are definitely not the same thing.
> > >
> > > aux->transfer is a very low level thing. I don't think it's the
> > > correct level of abstraction for sideband.
> > >
> > >> + break;
> > >> +
> > >> + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ:
> > >> + case DP_AUX_I2C_READ:
> > >> + ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_read(port->mgr, port, msg->address,
> > >> + msg->size, msg->buffer);
> > >> + break;
> > >> +
> > >> + default:
> > >> + ret = -EINVAL;
> > >> + break;
> > >> + }
> > >> +
> > >> + return ret;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> static int drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(u8 dp_link_bw, u8 dp_link_count)
> > >> {
> > >> if (dp_link_bw == 0 || dp_link_count == 0)
> > >> --
> > >> 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> dri-devel mailing list
> > >> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > >
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Sam McNally <sammc@chromium.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm_dp_mst_topology: use correct AUX channel
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 15:24:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YB1HBDEB5/fefQzi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJqEsoCOJmS5aVb5du09tXUi7UUKVBQDPe5KTdcBiDr8A7kSYA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:17:51PM +1100, Sam McNally wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 21:19, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/02/2021 23:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:13:53PM +1000, Sam McNally wrote:
> > >> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> > >>
> > >> For adapters behind an MST hub use the correct AUX channel.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> > >> [sammc@chromium.org: rebased, removing redundant changes]
> > >> Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc@chromium.org>
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> (no changes since v1)
> > >>
> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > >> index 15b6cc39a754..0d753201adbd 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > >> @@ -2255,6 +2255,9 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_unlink_port(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > >> drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static ssize_t
> > >> +drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg);
> > >> +
> > >> static struct drm_dp_mst_port *
> > >> drm_dp_mst_add_port(struct drm_device *dev,
> > >> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > >> @@ -2271,9 +2274,13 @@ drm_dp_mst_add_port(struct drm_device *dev,
> > >> port->port_num = port_number;
> > >> port->mgr = mgr;
> > >> port->aux.name = "DPMST";
> > >> + mutex_init(&port->aux.hw_mutex);
> > >> + mutex_init(&port->aux.cec.lock);
> > >> port->aux.dev = dev->dev;
> > >> port->aux.is_remote = true;
> > >>
> > >> + port->aux.transfer = drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer;
> > >> +
> > >
> > > This was supposed to be handled via higher levels checking for
> > > is_remote==true.
> >
> > Ah, I suspect this patch can be dropped entirely: it predates commit 2f221a5efed4
> > ("drm/dp_mst: Add MST support to DP DPCD R/W functions").
> >
> > It looks like that commit basically solved what this older patch attempts to do
> > as well.
> >
> > Sam, can you test if it works without this patch?
>
> It almost just works; drm_dp_cec uses whether aux.transfer is non-null
> to filter out non-DP connectors. Using aux.is_remote as another signal
> indicating a DP connector seems plausible. We can drop this patch.
Why would anyone even call this stuff on a non-DP connector?
And where did they even get the struct drm_dp_aux to do so?
> Thanks all!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > >
> > >> /* initialize the MST downstream port's AUX crc work queue */
> > >> drm_dp_remote_aux_init(&port->aux);
> > >>
> > >> @@ -3503,6 +3510,35 @@ static int drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> > >> return 0;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> +static ssize_t
> > >> +drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> > >> +{
> > >> + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port =
> > >> + container_of(aux, struct drm_dp_mst_port, aux);
> > >> + int ret;
> > >> +
> > >> + switch (msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) {
> > >> + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE:
> > >> + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE:
> > >> + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE:
> > >> + ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(port->mgr, port, msg->address,
> > >> + msg->size, msg->buffer);
> > >
> > > That doesn't make sense to me. I2c writes and DPCD writes
> > > are definitely not the same thing.
> > >
> > > aux->transfer is a very low level thing. I don't think it's the
> > > correct level of abstraction for sideband.
> > >
> > >> + break;
> > >> +
> > >> + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ:
> > >> + case DP_AUX_I2C_READ:
> > >> + ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_read(port->mgr, port, msg->address,
> > >> + msg->size, msg->buffer);
> > >> + break;
> > >> +
> > >> + default:
> > >> + ret = -EINVAL;
> > >> + break;
> > >> + }
> > >> +
> > >> + return ret;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> static int drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(u8 dp_link_bw, u8 dp_link_count)
> > >> {
> > >> if (dp_link_bw == 0 || dp_link_count == 0)
> > >> --
> > >> 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> dri-devel mailing list
> > >> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > >
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 2:13 [PATCH v3 1/4] dp/dp_mst: Add support for sink event notify messages Sam McNally
2020-09-23 2:13 ` Sam McNally
2020-09-23 2:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm_dp_mst_topology: use correct AUX channel Sam McNally
2020-09-23 2:13 ` Sam McNally
2021-02-01 21:58 ` Lyude Paul
2021-02-01 21:58 ` Lyude Paul
2021-02-01 22:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-01 22:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-04 10:19 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-04 10:19 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-05 5:17 ` Sam McNally
2021-02-05 5:17 ` Sam McNally
2021-02-05 13:24 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-02-05 13:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-05 13:46 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-05 13:46 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-05 14:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-05 14:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-23 2:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm_dp_mst_topology: export two functions Sam McNally
2020-09-23 2:13 ` Sam McNally
2021-02-01 22:02 ` Lyude Paul
2021-02-01 22:02 ` Lyude Paul
2021-02-05 7:41 ` Sam McNally
2021-02-05 7:41 ` Sam McNally
2020-09-23 2:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm_dp_cec: add MST support Sam McNally
2020-09-23 2:13 ` Sam McNally
2021-02-04 10:42 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-04 10:42 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-05 7:35 ` Sam McNally
2021-02-05 7:35 ` Sam McNally
2021-01-12 9:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dp/dp_mst: Add support for sink event notify messages Hans Verkuil
2021-01-12 9:24 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-01 9:57 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-01 9:57 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-01 21:56 ` Lyude Paul
2021-02-01 21:56 ` Lyude Paul
2021-02-03 9:56 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-03 9:56 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-04 9:54 ` Sam McNally
2021-02-04 10:44 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-04 10:44 ` Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YB1HBDEB5/fefQzi@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sammc@chromium.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.