From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver()
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBKLQ1m35Bouc6/B@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a24391e62b107040435766fff52bdd31@walle.cc>
Hi,
* Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> [210125 19:52]:
> Although I do have the changes for the builtin_platform_driver_probe()
> ready, I don't think it makes much sense to send these unless we agree
> on the increased memory footprint. While there are just a few
> builtin_platform_driver_probe() and memory increase _might_ be
> negligible, there are many more module_platform_driver_probe().
I just noticed this thread today and have pretty much come to the same
conclusions. No need to post a patch for pci-dra7xx.c, I already posted
a patch for pci-dra7xx.c yesterday as part of genpd related changes.
For me probing started breaking as the power-domains property got added.
FYI, it's the following patch:
[PATCH 01/15] PCI: pci-dra7xx: Prepare for deferred probe with module_platform_driver
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver()
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBKLQ1m35Bouc6/B@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a24391e62b107040435766fff52bdd31@walle.cc>
Hi,
* Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> [210125 19:52]:
> Although I do have the changes for the builtin_platform_driver_probe()
> ready, I don't think it makes much sense to send these unless we agree
> on the increased memory footprint. While there are just a few
> builtin_platform_driver_probe() and memory increase _might_ be
> negligible, there are many more module_platform_driver_probe().
I just noticed this thread today and have pretty much come to the same
conclusions. No need to post a patch for pci-dra7xx.c, I already posted
a patch for pci-dra7xx.c yesterday as part of genpd related changes.
For me probing started breaking as the power-domains property got added.
FYI, it's the following patch:
[PATCH 01/15] PCI: pci-dra7xx: Prepare for deferred probe with module_platform_driver
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver()
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBKLQ1m35Bouc6/B@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a24391e62b107040435766fff52bdd31@walle.cc>
Hi,
* Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> [210125 19:52]:
> Although I do have the changes for the builtin_platform_driver_probe()
> ready, I don't think it makes much sense to send these unless we agree
> on the increased memory footprint. While there are just a few
> builtin_platform_driver_probe() and memory increase _might_ be
> negligible, there are many more module_platform_driver_probe().
I just noticed this thread today and have pretty much come to the same
conclusions. No need to post a patch for pci-dra7xx.c, I already posted
a patch for pci-dra7xx.c yesterday as part of genpd related changes.
For me probing started breaking as the power-domains property got added.
FYI, it's the following patch:
[PATCH 01/15] PCI: pci-dra7xx: Prepare for deferred probe with module_platform_driver
Regards,
Tony
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-20 10:52 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: layerscape: convert to builtin_platform_driver() Michael Walle
2021-01-20 10:52 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 10:52 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 14:23 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 14:23 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 14:23 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 14:34 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 14:34 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 14:34 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 15:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-20 15:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-20 15:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-20 19:02 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:02 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:02 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:25 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 19:28 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 19:28 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 19:28 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 19:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 19:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 23:53 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 23:53 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 23:53 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-20 23:58 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 23:58 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-20 23:58 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-21 11:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-21 11:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-21 11:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-25 19:49 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 19:49 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 19:49 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 22:41 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 22:41 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 22:41 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-26 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 0:44 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 0:44 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 0:44 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 16:41 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 16:41 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 16:41 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 16:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 16:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 16:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-27 17:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 17:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-27 17:10 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-28 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-28 10:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:00 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2021-01-28 10:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-28 10:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-01-25 16:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-25 16:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-25 16:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-25 18:58 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 18:58 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 18:58 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-25 19:44 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 19:44 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-25 19:44 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-26 10:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:39 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-26 10:39 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-26 10:39 ` Michael Walle
2021-01-26 10:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 10:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 10:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 10:55 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:55 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-26 10:55 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YBKLQ1m35Bouc6/B@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
--cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
--cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.