From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
guohanjun@huawei.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, moritzf@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Do not blindly trust DMA masks from firmware
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:11:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBLwXgUJR4L6IiSl@epycbox.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161175296410.16506.7622624950228429208.b4-ty@arm.com>
Hi Catalin,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 01:09:36PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:24:19 -0800, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > Address issue observed on real world system with suboptimal IORT table
> > where DMA masks of PCI devices would get set to 0 as result.
> >
> > iort_dma_setup() would query the root complex'/named component IORT
> > entry for a DMA mask, and use that over the one the device has been
> > configured with earlier.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
>
> [1/1] ACPI/IORT: Do not blindly trust DMA masks from firmware
> https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a1df829ead58
>
> --
> Catalin
>
Should we consider this for stable, too? If so I can send an email to
stable@ once it's in Linus' tree, since I'm the one forgetting to CC
stable in the first place :)
It would be nice if at least 5.10 would get this.
Cheers,
Moritz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, guohanjun@huawei.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
moritzf@google.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Do not blindly trust DMA masks from firmware
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:11:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBLwXgUJR4L6IiSl@epycbox.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161175296410.16506.7622624950228429208.b4-ty@arm.com>
Hi Catalin,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 01:09:36PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:24:19 -0800, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > Address issue observed on real world system with suboptimal IORT table
> > where DMA masks of PCI devices would get set to 0 as result.
> >
> > iort_dma_setup() would query the root complex'/named component IORT
> > entry for a DMA mask, and use that over the one the device has been
> > configured with earlier.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
>
> [1/1] ACPI/IORT: Do not blindly trust DMA masks from firmware
> https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a1df829ead58
>
> --
> Catalin
>
Should we consider this for stable, too? If so I can send an email to
stable@ once it's in Linus' tree, since I'm the one forgetting to CC
stable in the first place :)
It would be nice if at least 5.10 would get this.
Cheers,
Moritz
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-22 1:24 [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Do not blindly trust DMA masks from firmware Moritz Fischer
2021-01-22 1:24 ` Moritz Fischer
2021-01-22 14:42 ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-22 14:42 ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-22 17:50 ` Moritz Fischer
2021-01-22 17:50 ` Moritz Fischer
2021-01-22 19:17 ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-22 19:17 ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-22 19:43 ` Moritz Fischer
2021-01-22 19:43 ` Moritz Fischer
2021-01-27 11:19 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-27 11:19 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-01-27 13:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-27 13:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-28 17:11 ` Moritz Fischer [this message]
2021-01-28 17:11 ` Moritz Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YBLwXgUJR4L6IiSl@epycbox.lan \
--to=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=moritzf@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.