All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Changman Lee <cm224.lee@samsung.com>,
	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] f2fs_convert_inline_inode causing rebalance based on random uninitialized value in dn.node_changed
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:44:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YD/nFt6Gswnyogfa@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fcca081-9a60-8ae3-5cac-d8aa38c38ff2@canonical.com>

On 03/02, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Static analysis on linux-next detected a potential uninitialized
> variable dn.node_changed that does not get set when a call to
> f2fs_get_node_page() fails.  This uninitialized value gets used in the
> call to f2fs_balance_fs() that may or not may not balances dirty node
> and dentry pages depending on the uninitialized state of the variable.
> 
> I believe the issue was introduced by commit:
> 
> commit 2a3407607028f7c780f1c20faa4e922bf631d340
> Author: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> Date:   Tue Dec 22 13:23:35 2015 -0800
> 
>     f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed
> 
> 
> The analysis is a follows:
> 
> 184 int f2fs_convert_inline_inode(struct inode *inode)
> 185 {
> 186        struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> 
>    1. var_decl: Declaring variable dn without initializer.
> 
> 187        struct dnode_of_data dn;
> 
>    NOTE dn is not initialized here.
> 
> 188        struct page *ipage, *page;
> 189        int err = 0;
> 190
> 
>    2. Condition !f2fs_has_inline_data(inode), taking false branch.
>    3. Condition f2fs_hw_is_readonly(sbi), taking false branch.
>    4. Condition f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb), taking false branch.
> 
> 191        if (!f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) ||
> 192                        f2fs_hw_is_readonly(sbi) ||
> f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb))
> 193                return 0;
> 194
> 195        err = dquot_initialize(inode);
> 
>    5. Condition err, taking false branch.
> 
> 196        if (err)
> 197                return err;
> 198
> 199        page = f2fs_grab_cache_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, false);
> 
>    6. Condition !page, taking false branch.
> 
> 200        if (!page)
> 201                return -ENOMEM;
> 202
> 203        f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> 204
> 205        ipage = f2fs_get_node_page(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> 
>    7. Condition IS_ERR(ipage), taking true branch.
> 
> 206        if (IS_ERR(ipage)) {
> 207                err = PTR_ERR(ipage);
> 
>    8. Jumping to label out.
> 
> 208                goto out;
> 209        }
> 210
> 
>    NOTE: set_new_dnode memset's dn so sets the flag to false, but we
> don't get to this memset if IS_ERR(ipage) above is true.
> 
> 211        set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, ipage, ipage, 0);
> 212
> 213        if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode))
> 214                err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
> 215
> 216        f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> 217 out:
> 218        f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> 219
> 220        f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> 221
> 
> Uninitialized scalar variable:
> 
>    9. uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value dn.node_changed when
> calling f2fs_balance_fs.
> 
> 222        f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
> 223
> 224        return err;
> 225 }
> 
> I think a suitable fix will be to set dn.node_changed to false on in
> line 207-208 but I'm concerned if I'm missing something subtle to the
> rebalancing if I do this.
> 
> Comments?

Thank you for the report. Yes, it seems that's a right call and we need to
check the error to decide calling f2fs_balance_fs() in line 222, since
set_new_dnode() is used to set all the fields in dnode_of_data. So, if you
don't mind, could you please post a patch?

Thanks,

> 
> Colin
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Changman Lee <cm224.lee@samsung.com>,
	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: f2fs_convert_inline_inode causing rebalance based on random uninitialized value in dn.node_changed
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:44:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YD/nFt6Gswnyogfa@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fcca081-9a60-8ae3-5cac-d8aa38c38ff2@canonical.com>

On 03/02, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Static analysis on linux-next detected a potential uninitialized
> variable dn.node_changed that does not get set when a call to
> f2fs_get_node_page() fails.  This uninitialized value gets used in the
> call to f2fs_balance_fs() that may or not may not balances dirty node
> and dentry pages depending on the uninitialized state of the variable.
> 
> I believe the issue was introduced by commit:
> 
> commit 2a3407607028f7c780f1c20faa4e922bf631d340
> Author: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> Date:   Tue Dec 22 13:23:35 2015 -0800
> 
>     f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed
> 
> 
> The analysis is a follows:
> 
> 184 int f2fs_convert_inline_inode(struct inode *inode)
> 185 {
> 186        struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> 
>    1. var_decl: Declaring variable dn without initializer.
> 
> 187        struct dnode_of_data dn;
> 
>    NOTE dn is not initialized here.
> 
> 188        struct page *ipage, *page;
> 189        int err = 0;
> 190
> 
>    2. Condition !f2fs_has_inline_data(inode), taking false branch.
>    3. Condition f2fs_hw_is_readonly(sbi), taking false branch.
>    4. Condition f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb), taking false branch.
> 
> 191        if (!f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) ||
> 192                        f2fs_hw_is_readonly(sbi) ||
> f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb))
> 193                return 0;
> 194
> 195        err = dquot_initialize(inode);
> 
>    5. Condition err, taking false branch.
> 
> 196        if (err)
> 197                return err;
> 198
> 199        page = f2fs_grab_cache_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, false);
> 
>    6. Condition !page, taking false branch.
> 
> 200        if (!page)
> 201                return -ENOMEM;
> 202
> 203        f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> 204
> 205        ipage = f2fs_get_node_page(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> 
>    7. Condition IS_ERR(ipage), taking true branch.
> 
> 206        if (IS_ERR(ipage)) {
> 207                err = PTR_ERR(ipage);
> 
>    8. Jumping to label out.
> 
> 208                goto out;
> 209        }
> 210
> 
>    NOTE: set_new_dnode memset's dn so sets the flag to false, but we
> don't get to this memset if IS_ERR(ipage) above is true.
> 
> 211        set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, ipage, ipage, 0);
> 212
> 213        if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode))
> 214                err = f2fs_convert_inline_page(&dn, page);
> 215
> 216        f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> 217 out:
> 218        f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> 219
> 220        f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> 221
> 
> Uninitialized scalar variable:
> 
>    9. uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value dn.node_changed when
> calling f2fs_balance_fs.
> 
> 222        f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, dn.node_changed);
> 223
> 224        return err;
> 225 }
> 
> I think a suitable fix will be to set dn.node_changed to false on in
> line 207-208 but I'm concerned if I'm missing something subtle to the
> rebalancing if I do this.
> 
> Comments?

Thank you for the report. Yes, it seems that's a right call and we need to
check the error to decide calling f2fs_balance_fs() in line 222, since
set_new_dnode() is used to set all the fields in dnode_of_data. So, if you
don't mind, could you please post a patch?

Thanks,

> 
> Colin
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-03 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02 20:07 [f2fs-dev] f2fs_convert_inline_inode causing rebalance based on random uninitialized value in dn.node_changed Colin Ian King
2021-03-02 20:07 ` Colin Ian King
2021-03-03 19:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2021-03-03 19:44   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-03-03 22:59   ` [f2fs-dev] " Colin Ian King
2021-03-03 22:59     ` Colin Ian King
2021-03-03 23:46     ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-03-03 23:46       ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YD/nFt6Gswnyogfa@google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
    --cc=cm224.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.