From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: snitzer@redhat.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
nramas@linux.microsoft.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
gmazyland@gmail.com, agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] IMA: generalize key measurement tests
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:38:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDWD+9dB8kx0ZPYR@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c14c80-660a-0f36-64ca-ae5230992032@linux.microsoft.com>
Hi Tushar,
> Thanks for your review.
> My sincere apologies for missing this email and not responding in time.
> The device mapper measurement work is being revisited - to cover aspects
> like more DM targets (not just dm-crypt), better memory management,
> more relevant attributes from the DM targets, other corner cases etc.
> Therefore, even though this patch, "1/2: generalize key measurement
> tests", would be useful for other tests; I will have to revisit the
> second patch, "2/2: dm-crypt measurements", to address the DM side changes I
> mentioned above.
> I will revisit this series, esp. testing the DM target measurements
> part, once the kernel work I mentioned above is close to completion.
> I will also address your feedback on patch #1 and #2 from v2 iteration
> at that time.
> Thanks again for your review and feedback.
I updated your patchset a bit and going to send it to ML.
Kind regards,
Petr
> Thanks,
> Tushar
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: zohar@linux.ibm.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
gmazyland@gmail.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] IMA: generalize key measurement tests
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:38:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDWD+9dB8kx0ZPYR@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c14c80-660a-0f36-64ca-ae5230992032@linux.microsoft.com>
Hi Tushar,
> Thanks for your review.
> My sincere apologies for missing this email and not responding in time.
> The device mapper measurement work is being revisited - to cover aspects
> like more DM targets (not just dm-crypt), better memory management,
> more relevant attributes from the DM targets, other corner cases etc.
> Therefore, even though this patch, "1/2: generalize key measurement
> tests", would be useful for other tests; I will have to revisit the
> second patch, "2/2: dm-crypt measurements", to address the DM side changes I
> mentioned above.
> I will revisit this series, esp. testing the DM target measurements
> part, once the kernel work I mentioned above is close to completion.
> I will also address your feedback on patch #1 and #2 from v2 iteration
> at that time.
> Thanks again for your review and feedback.
I updated your patchset a bit and going to send it to ML.
Kind regards,
Petr
> Thanks,
> Tushar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] IMA: generalize key measurement tests
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 23:38:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDWD+9dB8kx0ZPYR@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c14c80-660a-0f36-64ca-ae5230992032@linux.microsoft.com>
Hi Tushar,
> Thanks for your review.
> My sincere apologies for missing this email and not responding in time.
> The device mapper measurement work is being revisited - to cover aspects
> like more DM targets (not just dm-crypt), better memory management,
> more relevant attributes from the DM targets, other corner cases etc.
> Therefore, even though this patch, "1/2: generalize key measurement
> tests", would be useful for other tests; I will have to revisit the
> second patch, "2/2: dm-crypt measurements", to address the DM side changes I
> mentioned above.
> I will revisit this series, esp. testing the DM target measurements
> part, once the kernel work I mentioned above is close to completion.
> I will also address your feedback on patch #1 and #2 from v2 iteration
> at that time.
> Thanks again for your review and feedback.
I updated your patchset a bit and going to send it to ML.
Kind regards,
Petr
> Thanks,
> Tushar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-23 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-28 3:56 [PATCH v2 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-28 3:56 ` [LTP] " Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-28 3:56 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <20200928035605.22701-1-tusharsu-1pm0nblsJy7Jp67UH1NAhkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2020-09-28 3:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] IMA: generalize key measurement tests Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-28 3:56 ` [LTP] " Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-28 3:56 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2020-12-21 23:05 ` [dm-devel] " Petr Vorel
2020-12-21 23:05 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2020-12-21 23:05 ` Petr Vorel
2021-02-22 18:54 ` [dm-devel] " Tushar Sugandhi
2021-02-22 18:54 ` [LTP] " Tushar Sugandhi
2021-02-22 18:54 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-02-23 22:38 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2021-02-23 22:38 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-02-23 22:38 ` Petr Vorel
2020-09-28 3:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-28 3:56 ` [LTP] " Tushar Sugandhi
2020-09-28 3:56 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2021-01-12 23:13 ` [dm-devel] " Petr Vorel
2021-01-12 23:13 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-01-12 23:13 ` Petr Vorel
2021-05-06 9:14 ` [dm-devel] " Petr Vorel
2021-05-06 9:14 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-05-06 9:14 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YDWD+9dB8kx0ZPYR@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.