From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 17:57:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDvLeslGElXdjf2t@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e662d6bf-53e3-9774-37db-9e7ea88a4ec9@redhat.com>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 05:28:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/28/21 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
> >> of 5.11.1
> >
> > Is this the same issue reported here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> > ?
> >
> > If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well?
>
> I see in the original email:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/3423617.kz1aARBMGD@archlinux/
>
> That Diego is using the iGPU part of a Haswell CPU, so yes this is almost
> certainly the same issue.
>
> Diego as I already mentioned to another arch user, it would be good if the
> arch kernel-maintainers can pick-up these 3 commits from the drm-intel tree
> as downstream patches for now:
>
> e627d5923cae ("drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals")
> d30bbd62b1bf ("drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state")
> 1914911f4aa0 ("drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear")
>
> We (Fedora) have added these as downstream patches for now and we have
> multiple reports that these resolve the problem.
>
> Chris, can you please send the 2nd and 3th commit of the above list on
> their way to Linus ASAP, so that Greg can add them to the stable series?
>
> ATM only the 1st commit is in Linus tree (unless the others have landed
> with different hashes?)
I have queued the first one up now, thanks.
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 17:57:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDvLeslGElXdjf2t@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e662d6bf-53e3-9774-37db-9e7ea88a4ec9@redhat.com>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 05:28:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/28/21 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as
> >> of 5.11.1
> >
> > Is this the same issue reported here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@redhat.com
> > ?
> >
> > If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well?
>
> I see in the original email:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/3423617.kz1aARBMGD@archlinux/
>
> That Diego is using the iGPU part of a Haswell CPU, so yes this is almost
> certainly the same issue.
>
> Diego as I already mentioned to another arch user, it would be good if the
> arch kernel-maintainers can pick-up these 3 commits from the drm-intel tree
> as downstream patches for now:
>
> e627d5923cae ("drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals")
> d30bbd62b1bf ("drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state")
> 1914911f4aa0 ("drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear")
>
> We (Fedora) have added these as downstream patches for now and we have
> multiple reports that these resolve the problem.
>
> Chris, can you please send the 2nd and 3th commit of the above list on
> their way to Linus ASAP, so that Greg can add them to the stable series?
>
> ATM only the 1st commit is in Linus tree (unless the others have landed
> with different hashes?)
I have queued the first one up now, thanks.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-28 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-28 14:29 [Intel-gfx] -stable regression in Intel graphics, introduced in Linux 5.10.9 Diego Calleja
2021-02-28 14:29 ` Diego Calleja
2021-02-28 15:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Greg KH
2021-02-28 15:14 ` Greg KH
2021-02-28 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2021-02-28 16:28 ` Hans de Goede
2021-02-28 16:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-02-28 16:57 ` Greg KH
2021-02-28 20:05 ` Diego Calleja
2021-02-28 20:05 ` Diego Calleja
2021-03-01 9:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Greg KH
2021-03-01 9:09 ` Greg KH
2021-03-01 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Diego Calleja
2021-03-01 10:11 ` Diego Calleja
2021-03-01 10:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Greg KH
2021-03-01 10:24 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YDvLeslGElXdjf2t@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=diegocg@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.