* [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
@ 2021-03-03 3:44 Eric Snowberg
2021-03-03 9:24 ` David Howells
2021-03-04 4:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Snowberg @ 2021-03-03 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rdunlap, dhowells; +Cc: dwmw2, keyrings, linux-kernel, eric.snowberg
This fixes a build issue when x509_revocation_list is not defined.
$ make ARCH=x86_64 O=build64 all
EXTRACT_CERTS ../
At main.c:154:
- SSL error:0909006C:PEM routines:get_name:no start line: crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:745
extract-cert: ../: Is a directory
make[2]: [../certs/Makefile:119: certs/x509_revocation_list] Error 1 (ignored)
When the new CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST was added [1], it was not carried
into the code for preloading the revocation certificates [2]. Change from
using the original CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING to the new
CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m562c1b27bf402190e7bb573ad20eff5b6310d08f
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m07e258bf019ccbac23820fad5192ceffa74fc6ab
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
---
certs/Makefile | 7 +++++--
certs/blacklist.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/certs/Makefile b/certs/Makefile
index e3f4926fd21e..3bc43c88a6d2 100644
--- a/certs/Makefile
+++ b/certs/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,10 @@
#
obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) += system_keyring.o system_certificates.o common.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o revocation_certificates.o common.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o common.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += revocation_certificates.o
+endif
ifneq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST),"")
obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist_hashes.o
else
@@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ $(obj)/signing_key.x509: scripts/extract-cert $(X509_DEP) FORCE
$(call if_changed,extract_certs,$(MODULE_SIG_KEY_SRCPREFIX)$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY))
endif # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
-ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING),y)
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
$(eval $(call config_filename,SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS))
diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index 723b19c96256..c9a435b15af4 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -21,8 +21,10 @@
static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
extern __initconst const u8 revocation_certificate_list[];
extern __initconst const unsigned long revocation_certificate_list_size;
+#endif
/*
* The description must be a type prefix, a colon and then an even number of
@@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
*/
device_initcall(blacklist_init);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
/*
* Load the compiled-in list of revocation X.509 certificates.
*/
@@ -237,3 +240,4 @@ static __init int load_revocation_certificate_list(void)
blacklist_keyring);
}
late_initcall(load_revocation_certificate_list);
+#endif
--
2.18.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
2021-03-03 3:44 [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list Eric Snowberg
@ 2021-03-03 9:24 ` David Howells
2021-03-04 2:45 ` Eric Snowberg
2021-03-04 4:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2021-03-03 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Snowberg; +Cc: dhowells, rdunlap, dwmw2, keyrings, linux-kernel
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com> wrote:
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += revocation_certificates.o
> +endif
Should the ifeq be referring to CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS rather than
CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST? In fact, since S_R_K depends indirectly on
S_B_K, you should be able to just do:
+obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS) += revocation_certificates.o
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
Here also?
> + hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += extract-cert
And here too?
(As an aside, I wonder if SYSTEM_REVOCATION_CERTS would be a better name, but
I'm okay with leaving it as-is for now).
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
2021-03-03 9:24 ` David Howells
@ 2021-03-04 2:45 ` Eric Snowberg
2021-03-04 15:25 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Snowberg @ 2021-03-04 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells
Cc: Randy Dunlap, David Woodhouse, keyrings, linux-kernel,
Eric Snowberg
> On Mar 3, 2021, at 2:24 AM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += revocation_certificates.o
>> +endif
>
> Should the ifeq be referring to CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS rather than
> CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST? In fact, since S_R_K depends indirectly on
> S_B_K, you should be able to just do:
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS) += revocation_certificates.o
Since S_R_K is a string, I could not get that to work. I could get this
to work:
obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST) += revocation_certificates.o
If there is another way of doing this with S_R_K instead, let me know.
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
>
> Here also?
When S_R_L is defined, S_R_K will also always be defined too. Either as an
empty string or a path to a file. With my change, it works the same as the
current code in CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS and CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING,
which also uses the extract_certs script. It can properly handle a NULL
string. If I changed it to S_R_K here, it seems confusing to me, since one
might assume it is only defined when someone adds a string to S_R_K. But,
I can change it if you’d like.
>> + hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += extract-cert
>
> And here too?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
2021-03-03 3:44 [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list Eric Snowberg
2021-03-03 9:24 ` David Howells
@ 2021-03-04 4:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2021-03-04 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Snowberg; +Cc: rdunlap, dhowells, dwmw2, keyrings, linux-kernel
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:44:18PM -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> This fixes a build issue when x509_revocation_list is not defined.
"Fix a"
Let's stick to the imperative form in commit messages.
>
> $ make ARCH=x86_64 O=build64 all
>
> EXTRACT_CERTS ../
> At main.c:154:
> - SSL error:0909006C:PEM routines:get_name:no start line: crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:745
> extract-cert: ../: Is a directory
> make[2]: [../certs/Makefile:119: certs/x509_revocation_list] Error 1 (ignored)
>
> When the new CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST was added [1], it was not carried
> into the code for preloading the revocation certificates [2]. Change from
> using the original CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING to the new
> CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m562c1b27bf402190e7bb573ad20eff5b6310d08f
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m07e258bf019ccbac23820fad5192ceffa74fc6ab
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
> ---
> certs/Makefile | 7 +++++--
> certs/blacklist.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/certs/Makefile b/certs/Makefile
> index e3f4926fd21e..3bc43c88a6d2 100644
> --- a/certs/Makefile
> +++ b/certs/Makefile
> @@ -4,7 +4,10 @@
> #
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) += system_keyring.o system_certificates.o common.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o revocation_certificates.o common.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o common.o
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += revocation_certificates.o
> +endif
> ifneq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST),"")
> obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist_hashes.o
> else
> @@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ $(obj)/signing_key.x509: scripts/extract-cert $(X509_DEP) FORCE
> $(call if_changed,extract_certs,$(MODULE_SIG_KEY_SRCPREFIX)$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY))
> endif # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
>
> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING),y)
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
>
> $(eval $(call config_filename,SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS))
>
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index 723b19c96256..c9a435b15af4 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@
>
> static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
> extern __initconst const u8 revocation_certificate_list[];
> extern __initconst const unsigned long revocation_certificate_list_size;
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * The description must be a type prefix, a colon and then an even number of
> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
> */
> device_initcall(blacklist_init);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
> /*
> * Load the compiled-in list of revocation X.509 certificates.
> */
> @@ -237,3 +240,4 @@ static __init int load_revocation_certificate_list(void)
> blacklist_keyring);
> }
> late_initcall(load_revocation_certificate_list);
> +#endif
> --
> 2.18.4
>
>
Code change looks good.
/Jarkko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-04 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-03 3:44 [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list Eric Snowberg
2021-03-03 9:24 ` David Howells
2021-03-04 2:45 ` Eric Snowberg
2021-03-04 15:25 ` David Howells
2021-03-04 4:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.