From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com, ltp@lists.linux.it,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IMA: Allow only ima-buf template for key measurement
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:21:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFDpFL3CSwMfZ6wo@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <deeb4320-a064-fd0f-bc1e-8e52be079ff9@linux.microsoft.com>
Hi Lakshmi,
> > Just a double check does it always work without template=ima-buf for all kernel versions?
> > Or only for kernels with dea87d0889dd ("ima: select ima-buf template for buffer measurement")
> > i.e. v5.11-rc1 or backport?
> The above change is required. Prior to this change, template has to be
> specified in the policy, otherwise the default template would be used.
The default template is ima-ng, right?
From what you write I understand that "measure func=KEY_CHECK
keyrings=.ima|.evm" will work only on newer kernel, thus we should always use
template=ima-buf as the policy example so that it's working also on that few
kernels between <v5.6,v5.10> (which have IMA key functionality, but not
dea87d0889dd), right?
But we should mention that in the README.md.
Kind regards,
Petr
> > Also, don't we want to change also keycheck.policy?
> > Currently it contains:
> > measure func=KEY_CHECK keyrings=.ima|.evm|.builtin_trusted_keys|.blacklist|key_import_test template=ima-buf
> > Do we want to drop template=ima-buf to test the default value? Or have two rules
> > (one with template=ima-buf, other w/a?)
> Good point.
> I will send you the v3 patch - with two rules: one with template=buf and
> other without a template, like the following example:
> measure func=KEY_CHECK
> keyrings=.builtin_trusted_keys|.blacklist|key_import_test template=ima-buf
> measure func=KEY_CHECK keyrings=.ima|.evm
> -lakshmi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] IMA: Allow only ima-buf template for key measurement
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:21:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFDpFL3CSwMfZ6wo@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <deeb4320-a064-fd0f-bc1e-8e52be079ff9@linux.microsoft.com>
Hi Lakshmi,
> > Just a double check does it always work without template=ima-buf for all kernel versions?
> > Or only for kernels with dea87d0889dd ("ima: select ima-buf template for buffer measurement")
> > i.e. v5.11-rc1 or backport?
> The above change is required. Prior to this change, template has to be
> specified in the policy, otherwise the default template would be used.
The default template is ima-ng, right?
From what you write I understand that "measure func=KEY_CHECK
keyrings=.ima|.evm" will work only on newer kernel, thus we should always use
template=ima-buf as the policy example so that it's working also on that few
kernels between <v5.6,v5.10> (which have IMA key functionality, but not
dea87d0889dd), right?
But we should mention that in the README.md.
Kind regards,
Petr
> > Also, don't we want to change also keycheck.policy?
> > Currently it contains:
> > measure func=KEY_CHECK keyrings=.ima|.evm|.builtin_trusted_keys|.blacklist|key_import_test template=ima-buf
> > Do we want to drop template=ima-buf to test the default value? Or have two rules
> > (one with template=ima-buf, other w/a?)
> Good point.
> I will send you the v3 patch - with two rules: one with template=buf and
> other without a template, like the following example:
> measure func=KEY_CHECK
> keyrings=.builtin_trusted_keys|.blacklist|key_import_test template=ima-buf
> measure func=KEY_CHECK keyrings=.ima|.evm
> -lakshmi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-14 23:36 [PATCH v2] IMA: Allow only ima-buf template for key measurement Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-03-14 23:36 ` [LTP] " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-03-16 14:07 ` Petr Vorel
2021-03-16 14:07 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-03-16 16:23 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-03-16 16:23 ` [LTP] " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-03-16 17:21 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2021-03-16 17:21 ` Petr Vorel
2021-03-16 18:50 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-03-16 18:50 ` [LTP] " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2021-03-17 20:37 ` Petr Vorel
2021-03-17 20:37 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YFDpFL3CSwMfZ6wo@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.