From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, David Coe <david.coe@live.co.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Tj <ml.linux@elloe.vision>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "iommu/amd: Fix performance counter initialization"
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:04:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YG2Dx3cZyfh6yfFo@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a910a80-5783-1f3d-a8ea-5e10cba0e206@molgen.mpg.de>
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:20:16AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Jörg, I know you are probably busy, but the patch was applied to the stable
> series (v5.11.7). There are still too many question open regarding the
> patch, and Suravee has not yet addressed the comments. It’d be great, if you
> could revert it.
We are currently discussing the next steps here. Maybe the retry logic
can be removed entirely.
Regards,
Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Tj <ml.linux@elloe.vision>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Coe <david.coe@live.co.uk>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "iommu/amd: Fix performance counter initialization"
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:04:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YG2Dx3cZyfh6yfFo@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a910a80-5783-1f3d-a8ea-5e10cba0e206@molgen.mpg.de>
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:20:16AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Jörg, I know you are probably busy, but the patch was applied to the stable
> series (v5.11.7). There are still too many question open regarding the
> patch, and Suravee has not yet addressed the comments. It’d be great, if you
> could revert it.
We are currently discussing the next steps here. Maybe the retry logic
can be removed entirely.
Regards,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-07 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-03 12:11 [PATCH] Revert "iommu/amd: Fix performance counter initialization" Paul Menzel
2021-03-03 13:25 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2021-03-03 14:10 ` Alexander Monakov
2021-03-18 9:20 ` Paul Menzel
2021-03-18 9:20 ` Paul Menzel
2021-04-07 10:04 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2021-04-07 10:04 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YG2Dx3cZyfh6yfFo@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
--cc=david.coe@live.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ml.linux@elloe.vision \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.