From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid()
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:57:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH7P0J4+1erJK7v5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f900f889-f059-7d48-dfc7-145c8cd54cf6@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:22:53AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.04.21 11:09, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Add comment describing the semantics of pfn_valid() that clarifies that
> > pfn_valid() only checks for availability of a memory map entry (i.e. struct
> > page) for a PFN rather than availability of usable memory backing that PFN.
> >
> > The most "generic" version of pfn_valid() used by the configurations with
> > SPARSEMEM enabled resides in include/linux/mmzone.h so this is the most
> > suitable place for documentation about semantics of pfn_valid().
> >
> > Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/mmzone.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > index 47946cec7584..961f0eeefb62 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -1410,6 +1410,17 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
> > #endif
> > #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> > +/**
> > + * pfn_valid - check if there is a valid memory map entry for a PFN
> > + * @pfn: the page frame number to check
> > + *
> > + * Check if there is a valid memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn.
> > + * Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
> > + * there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
> > + * represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise
> > + */
> > static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> > {
> > struct mem_section *ms;
> >
>
> I'd rephrase all "there is a valid memory map" to "there is a memory map"
> and add "pfn_valid() does to indicate whether the memory map as actually
> initialized -- see pfn_to_online_page()."
>
> pfn_valid() means that we can do a pfn_to_page() and don't get a fault when
> accessing the "struct page". It doesn't state anything about the content.
Well, I mean valid in the sense you can access the struct page :)
How about:
/**
* pfn_valid - check if there is a memory map entry for a PFN
* @pfn: the page frame number to check
*
* Check if there is a memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn and it
* is safe to access that struct page; the struct page state may be
* uninitialized -- see pfn_to_online_page().
*
* Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
* there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
* represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
*
* Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise.
*/
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid()
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:57:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH7P0J4+1erJK7v5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f900f889-f059-7d48-dfc7-145c8cd54cf6@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:22:53AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.04.21 11:09, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Add comment describing the semantics of pfn_valid() that clarifies that
> > pfn_valid() only checks for availability of a memory map entry (i.e. struct
> > page) for a PFN rather than availability of usable memory backing that PFN.
> >
> > The most "generic" version of pfn_valid() used by the configurations with
> > SPARSEMEM enabled resides in include/linux/mmzone.h so this is the most
> > suitable place for documentation about semantics of pfn_valid().
> >
> > Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/mmzone.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > index 47946cec7584..961f0eeefb62 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -1410,6 +1410,17 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
> > #endif
> > #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> > +/**
> > + * pfn_valid - check if there is a valid memory map entry for a PFN
> > + * @pfn: the page frame number to check
> > + *
> > + * Check if there is a valid memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn.
> > + * Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
> > + * there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
> > + * represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise
> > + */
> > static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> > {
> > struct mem_section *ms;
> >
>
> I'd rephrase all "there is a valid memory map" to "there is a memory map"
> and add "pfn_valid() does to indicate whether the memory map as actually
> initialized -- see pfn_to_online_page()."
>
> pfn_valid() means that we can do a pfn_to_page() and don't get a fault when
> accessing the "struct page". It doesn't state anything about the content.
Well, I mean valid in the sense you can access the struct page :)
How about:
/**
* pfn_valid - check if there is a memory map entry for a PFN
* @pfn: the page frame number to check
*
* Check if there is a memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn and it
* is safe to access that struct page; the struct page state may be
* uninitialized -- see pfn_to_online_page().
*
* Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
* there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
* represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
*
* Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise.
*/
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid()
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:57:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH7P0J4+1erJK7v5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f900f889-f059-7d48-dfc7-145c8cd54cf6@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:22:53AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.04.21 11:09, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Add comment describing the semantics of pfn_valid() that clarifies that
> > pfn_valid() only checks for availability of a memory map entry (i.e. struct
> > page) for a PFN rather than availability of usable memory backing that PFN.
> >
> > The most "generic" version of pfn_valid() used by the configurations with
> > SPARSEMEM enabled resides in include/linux/mmzone.h so this is the most
> > suitable place for documentation about semantics of pfn_valid().
> >
> > Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/mmzone.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > index 47946cec7584..961f0eeefb62 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -1410,6 +1410,17 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
> > #endif
> > #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> > +/**
> > + * pfn_valid - check if there is a valid memory map entry for a PFN
> > + * @pfn: the page frame number to check
> > + *
> > + * Check if there is a valid memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn.
> > + * Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
> > + * there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
> > + * represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise
> > + */
> > static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> > {
> > struct mem_section *ms;
> >
>
> I'd rephrase all "there is a valid memory map" to "there is a memory map"
> and add "pfn_valid() does to indicate whether the memory map as actually
> initialized -- see pfn_to_online_page()."
>
> pfn_valid() means that we can do a pfn_to_page() and don't get a fault when
> accessing the "struct page". It doesn't state anything about the content.
Well, I mean valid in the sense you can access the struct page :)
How about:
/**
* pfn_valid - check if there is a memory map entry for a PFN
* @pfn: the page frame number to check
*
* Check if there is a memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn and it
* is safe to access that struct page; the struct page state may be
* uninitialized -- see pfn_to_online_page().
*
* Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
* there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
* represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
*
* Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise.
*/
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 9:09 [PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 9:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 9:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 12:57 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-04-20 12:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 12:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 15:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 15:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 15:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 15:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 15:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 15:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 15:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 15:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 15:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 15:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 15:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 15:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 5:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 5:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 5:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 9:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 16:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 16:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 16:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21 5:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 5:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-21 5:52 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YH7P0J4+1erJK7v5@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.