All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: Drop __maybe_unused on x86 test declarations
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:03:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJ48xSO7fnj4wmtj@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513174614.2242210-2-robh@kernel.org>

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:46:14PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Function declarations don't need __maybe_unused annotations, only the
> implementations do. Drop them on the perf x86 tests.

for both patches:

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> index 462546bfc5f7..9599e7a3f1af 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> @@ -2,12 +2,11 @@
>  #ifndef ARCH_TESTS_H
>  #define ARCH_TESTS_H
>  
> -#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  struct test;
>  
>  /* Tests */
> -int test__rdpmc(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest);
> -int test__insn_x86(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest);
> +int test__rdpmc(struct test *test, int subtest);
> +int test__insn_x86(struct test *test, int subtest);
>  int test__intel_pt_pkt_decoder(struct test *test, int subtest);
>  int test__bp_modify(struct test *test, int subtest);
>  int test__x86_sample_parsing(struct test *test, int subtest);
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: Drop __maybe_unused on x86 test declarations
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:03:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJ48xSO7fnj4wmtj@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513174614.2242210-2-robh@kernel.org>

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:46:14PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Function declarations don't need __maybe_unused annotations, only the
> implementations do. Drop them on the perf x86 tests.

for both patches:

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> index 462546bfc5f7..9599e7a3f1af 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
> @@ -2,12 +2,11 @@
>  #ifndef ARCH_TESTS_H
>  #define ARCH_TESTS_H
>  
> -#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  struct test;
>  
>  /* Tests */
> -int test__rdpmc(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest);
> -int test__insn_x86(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest);
> +int test__rdpmc(struct test *test, int subtest);
> +int test__insn_x86(struct test *test, int subtest);
>  int test__intel_pt_pkt_decoder(struct test *test, int subtest);
>  int test__bp_modify(struct test *test, int subtest);
>  int test__x86_sample_parsing(struct test *test, int subtest);
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-14  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-13 17:46 [PATCH 1/2] perf tests: Consolidate test__arch_unwind_sample declaration Rob Herring
2021-05-13 17:46 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-13 17:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: Drop __maybe_unused on x86 test declarations Rob Herring
2021-05-13 17:46   ` Rob Herring
2021-05-14  9:03   ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-05-14  9:03     ` Jiri Olsa
2021-05-21 19:58     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-05-21 19:58       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YJ48xSO7fnj4wmtj@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.