From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:virtiofs" <virtio-fs@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of iovec to GLib's functions
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 10:39:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJO5RsRYQzTbFH09@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427181333.148176-1-ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
* Mahmoud Mandour (ma.mandourr@gmail.com) wrote:
> Replaced the calls to malloc()/calloc() and their respective
> calls to free() of iovec structs with GLib's allocation and
> deallocation functions and used g_autofree when appropriate.
>
> Replaced the allocation of in_sg_cpy to g_new() instead of a call
> to calloc() and a null-checking assertion. Not g_new0()
> because the buffer is immediately overwritten using memcpy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> * Removed a wrongful combination of g_autofree and g_steel_pointer().
> * Removed some goto paths that IMHO were not so useful any more.
> * In v2, I allocated in_sg_cpy through g_new0(). This patch, I use
> g_new() because the buffer is memcpy'd into right away so no need
> to zero-initialize.
> * Moved the declaration of in_sg_cpy to the top of the function
> to match QEMU's style guidelines.
>
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 8 +++-----
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> index c8bea246ab..7fe2cef1eb 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ static int send_reply(fuse_req_t req, int error, const void *arg,
> int fuse_reply_iov(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *iov, int count)
> {
> int res;
> - struct iovec *padded_iov;
> + g_autofree struct iovec *padded_iov = NULL;
>
> - padded_iov = malloc((count + 1) * sizeof(struct iovec));
> + padded_iov = g_try_new(struct iovec, count + 1);
> if (padded_iov == NULL) {
> return fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> }
> @@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ int fuse_reply_iov(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *iov, int count)
> count++;
>
> res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, padded_iov, count);
> - free(padded_iov);
>
> return res;
> }
> @@ -568,7 +567,7 @@ static struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(const struct iovec *iov,
> struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *fiov;
> size_t i;
>
> - fiov = malloc(sizeof(fiov[0]) * count);
> + fiov = g_try_new(struct fuse_ioctl_iovec, count);
> if (!fiov) {
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -586,8 +585,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
> size_t out_count)
> {
> struct fuse_ioctl_out arg;
> - struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *in_fiov = NULL;
> - struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *out_fiov = NULL;
> + g_autofree struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *in_fiov = NULL;
> + g_autofree struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *out_fiov = NULL;
> struct iovec iov[4];
> size_t count = 1;
> int res;
> @@ -603,13 +602,14 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
> /* Can't handle non-compat 64bit ioctls on 32bit */
> if (sizeof(void *) == 4 && req->ioctl_64bit) {
> res = fuse_reply_err(req, EINVAL);
> - goto out;
> + return res;
> }
>
> if (in_count) {
> in_fiov = fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(in_iov, in_count);
> if (!in_fiov) {
> - goto enomem;
> + res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> + return res;
That could have just been return fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
but that's minor.
Dave
> }
>
> iov[count].iov_base = (void *)in_fiov;
> @@ -619,7 +619,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
> if (out_count) {
> out_fiov = fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(out_iov, out_count);
> if (!out_fiov) {
> - goto enomem;
> + res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> + return res;
> }
>
> iov[count].iov_base = (void *)out_fiov;
> @@ -628,15 +629,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
> }
>
> res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, iov, count);
> -out:
> - free(in_fiov);
> - free(out_fiov);
>
> return res;
> -
> -enomem:
> - res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> - goto out;
> }
>
> int fuse_reply_ioctl(fuse_req_t req, int result, const void *buf, size_t size)
> @@ -663,11 +657,11 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl(fuse_req_t req, int result, const void *buf, size_t size)
> int fuse_reply_ioctl_iov(fuse_req_t req, int result, const struct iovec *iov,
> int count)
> {
> - struct iovec *padded_iov;
> + g_autofree struct iovec *padded_iov = NULL;
> struct fuse_ioctl_out arg;
> int res;
>
> - padded_iov = malloc((count + 2) * sizeof(struct iovec));
> + padded_iov = g_try_new(struct iovec, count + 2);
> if (padded_iov == NULL) {
> return fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> }
> @@ -680,7 +674,6 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_iov(fuse_req_t req, int result, const struct iovec *iov,
> memcpy(&padded_iov[2], iov, count * sizeof(struct iovec));
>
> res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, padded_iov, count + 2);
> - free(padded_iov);
>
> return res;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> index 9e437618fb..9b00687cb0 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
> VuVirtqElement *elem = &req->elem;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + g_autofree struct iovec *in_sg_cpy = NULL;
> +
> assert(count >= 1);
> assert(iov[0].iov_len >= sizeof(struct fuse_out_header));
>
> @@ -347,8 +349,7 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
> * Build a copy of the the in_sg iov so we can skip bits in it,
> * including changing the offsets
> */
> - struct iovec *in_sg_cpy = calloc(sizeof(struct iovec), in_num);
> - assert(in_sg_cpy);
> + in_sg_cpy = g_new(struct iovec, in_num);
> memcpy(in_sg_cpy, in_sg, sizeof(struct iovec) * in_num);
> /* These get updated as we skip */
> struct iovec *in_sg_ptr = in_sg_cpy;
> @@ -386,7 +387,6 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
> ret = errno;
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: preadv failed (%m) len=%zd\n",
> __func__, len);
> - free(in_sg_cpy);
> goto err;
> }
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: preadv ret=%d len=%zd\n", __func__,
> @@ -410,13 +410,11 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
> if (ret != len) {
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: ret!=len\n", __func__);
> ret = EIO;
> - free(in_sg_cpy);
> goto err;
> }
> in_sg_left -= ret;
> len -= ret;
> } while (in_sg_left);
> - free(in_sg_cpy);
>
> /* Need to fix out->len on EOF */
> if (len) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:virtiofs" <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of iovec to GLib's functions
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 10:39:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJO5RsRYQzTbFH09@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427181333.148176-1-ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
* Mahmoud Mandour (ma.mandourr@gmail.com) wrote:
> Replaced the calls to malloc()/calloc() and their respective
> calls to free() of iovec structs with GLib's allocation and
> deallocation functions and used g_autofree when appropriate.
>
> Replaced the allocation of in_sg_cpy to g_new() instead of a call
> to calloc() and a null-checking assertion. Not g_new0()
> because the buffer is immediately overwritten using memcpy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> * Removed a wrongful combination of g_autofree and g_steel_pointer().
> * Removed some goto paths that IMHO were not so useful any more.
> * In v2, I allocated in_sg_cpy through g_new0(). This patch, I use
> g_new() because the buffer is memcpy'd into right away so no need
> to zero-initialize.
> * Moved the declaration of in_sg_cpy to the top of the function
> to match QEMU's style guidelines.
>
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 8 +++-----
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> index c8bea246ab..7fe2cef1eb 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ static int send_reply(fuse_req_t req, int error, const void *arg,
> int fuse_reply_iov(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *iov, int count)
> {
> int res;
> - struct iovec *padded_iov;
> + g_autofree struct iovec *padded_iov = NULL;
>
> - padded_iov = malloc((count + 1) * sizeof(struct iovec));
> + padded_iov = g_try_new(struct iovec, count + 1);
> if (padded_iov == NULL) {
> return fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> }
> @@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ int fuse_reply_iov(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *iov, int count)
> count++;
>
> res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, padded_iov, count);
> - free(padded_iov);
>
> return res;
> }
> @@ -568,7 +567,7 @@ static struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(const struct iovec *iov,
> struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *fiov;
> size_t i;
>
> - fiov = malloc(sizeof(fiov[0]) * count);
> + fiov = g_try_new(struct fuse_ioctl_iovec, count);
> if (!fiov) {
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -586,8 +585,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
> size_t out_count)
> {
> struct fuse_ioctl_out arg;
> - struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *in_fiov = NULL;
> - struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *out_fiov = NULL;
> + g_autofree struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *in_fiov = NULL;
> + g_autofree struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *out_fiov = NULL;
> struct iovec iov[4];
> size_t count = 1;
> int res;
> @@ -603,13 +602,14 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
> /* Can't handle non-compat 64bit ioctls on 32bit */
> if (sizeof(void *) == 4 && req->ioctl_64bit) {
> res = fuse_reply_err(req, EINVAL);
> - goto out;
> + return res;
> }
>
> if (in_count) {
> in_fiov = fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(in_iov, in_count);
> if (!in_fiov) {
> - goto enomem;
> + res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> + return res;
That could have just been return fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
but that's minor.
Dave
> }
>
> iov[count].iov_base = (void *)in_fiov;
> @@ -619,7 +619,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
> if (out_count) {
> out_fiov = fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(out_iov, out_count);
> if (!out_fiov) {
> - goto enomem;
> + res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> + return res;
> }
>
> iov[count].iov_base = (void *)out_fiov;
> @@ -628,15 +629,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
> }
>
> res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, iov, count);
> -out:
> - free(in_fiov);
> - free(out_fiov);
>
> return res;
> -
> -enomem:
> - res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> - goto out;
> }
>
> int fuse_reply_ioctl(fuse_req_t req, int result, const void *buf, size_t size)
> @@ -663,11 +657,11 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl(fuse_req_t req, int result, const void *buf, size_t size)
> int fuse_reply_ioctl_iov(fuse_req_t req, int result, const struct iovec *iov,
> int count)
> {
> - struct iovec *padded_iov;
> + g_autofree struct iovec *padded_iov = NULL;
> struct fuse_ioctl_out arg;
> int res;
>
> - padded_iov = malloc((count + 2) * sizeof(struct iovec));
> + padded_iov = g_try_new(struct iovec, count + 2);
> if (padded_iov == NULL) {
> return fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> }
> @@ -680,7 +674,6 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_iov(fuse_req_t req, int result, const struct iovec *iov,
> memcpy(&padded_iov[2], iov, count * sizeof(struct iovec));
>
> res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, padded_iov, count + 2);
> - free(padded_iov);
>
> return res;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> index 9e437618fb..9b00687cb0 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
> VuVirtqElement *elem = &req->elem;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + g_autofree struct iovec *in_sg_cpy = NULL;
> +
> assert(count >= 1);
> assert(iov[0].iov_len >= sizeof(struct fuse_out_header));
>
> @@ -347,8 +349,7 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
> * Build a copy of the the in_sg iov so we can skip bits in it,
> * including changing the offsets
> */
> - struct iovec *in_sg_cpy = calloc(sizeof(struct iovec), in_num);
> - assert(in_sg_cpy);
> + in_sg_cpy = g_new(struct iovec, in_num);
> memcpy(in_sg_cpy, in_sg, sizeof(struct iovec) * in_num);
> /* These get updated as we skip */
> struct iovec *in_sg_ptr = in_sg_cpy;
> @@ -386,7 +387,6 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
> ret = errno;
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: preadv failed (%m) len=%zd\n",
> __func__, len);
> - free(in_sg_cpy);
> goto err;
> }
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: preadv ret=%d len=%zd\n", __func__,
> @@ -410,13 +410,11 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
> if (ret != len) {
> fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: ret!=len\n", __func__);
> ret = EIO;
> - free(in_sg_cpy);
> goto err;
> }
> in_sg_left -= ret;
> len -= ret;
> } while (in_sg_left);
> - free(in_sg_cpy);
>
> /* Need to fix out->len on EOF */
> if (len) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-06 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 15:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] virtiofsd: Changed various allocations to GLib functions Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 1/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of fuse_req " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 19:03 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 0:39 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 9:48 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 2/7] virtiofds: Changed allocations of iovec to GLib's functions Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 10:24 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 10:24 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 10:53 ` [Virtio-fs] " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 10:53 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 11:01 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 11:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 11:08 ` [Virtio-fs] " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 11:08 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 11:33 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 11:33 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 18:13 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/7] virtiofsd: " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 18:13 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-05-06 9:39 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2021-05-06 9:39 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 18:19 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 2/7] virtiofds: " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 18:19 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 18:41 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 18:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 10:57 ` [Virtio-fs] " Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-27 10:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 3/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of fuse_session " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 4/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocation of lo_map_elems " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 5/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of fv_VuDev & its internals to GLib functions Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 6/7] virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c: Changed local allocations " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 7/7] virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c: Changed allocations of locals to GLib Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-05-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] virtiofsd: Changed various allocations to GLib functions Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJO5RsRYQzTbFH09@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ma.mandourr@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.