From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, chao.song@mediatek.com,
zhuoliang.zhang@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers: net: mediatek: initial implementation of ccmni
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:31:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNNv1AxDNBdPcQ1U@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210623113452.5671-4-rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 07:34:52PM +0800, Rocco Yue wrote:
> +static int ccmni_open(struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + netif_tx_start_all_queues(ccmni_dev);
> + netif_carrier_on(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + if (atomic_inc_return(&ccmni->usage) > 1) {
> + atomic_dec(&ccmni->usage);
> + netdev_err(ccmni_dev, "dev already open\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
You only check this _AFTER_ starting up? If so, why even check a count
at all? Why does it matter as it's not keeping anything from working
here.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccmni_close(struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + atomic_dec(&ccmni->usage);
> + netif_tx_disable(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static netdev_tx_t
> +ccmni_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = NULL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!ccmni_hook_ready))
> + goto tx_ok;
> +
> + if (!skb || !ccmni_dev)
> + goto tx_ok;
> +
> + ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + /* some process can modify ccmni_dev->mtu */
> + if (skb->len > ccmni_dev->mtu) {
> + netdev_err(ccmni_dev, "xmit fail: len(0x%x) > MTU(0x%x, 0x%x)",
> + skb->len, CCMNI_MTU, ccmni_dev->mtu);
> + goto tx_ok;
> + }
> +
> + /* hardware driver send packet will return a negative value
> + * ask the Linux netdevice to stop the tx queue
> + */
> + if ((s_ccmni_ctlb->xmit_pkt(ccmni->index, skb, 0)) < 0)
> + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> +
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +tx_ok:
> + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> + ccmni_dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccmni_change_mtu(struct net_device *ccmni_dev, int new_mtu)
> +{
> + if (new_mtu < 0 || new_mtu > CCMNI_MTU)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!ccmni_dev))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ccmni_dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ccmni_tx_timeout(struct net_device *ccmni_dev, unsigned int txqueue)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + ccmni_dev->stats.tx_errors++;
> + if (atomic_read(&ccmni->usage) > 0)
> + netif_tx_wake_all_queues(ccmni_dev);
Why does it matter what the reference count is? What happens if it
drops _RIGHT_ after testing for it?
Anytime you do an atomic_read() call, it's almost always a sign that the
logic is not correct.
Again, why have this reference count at all? What is it protecting?
> +/* exposed API
> + * receive incoming datagrams from the Modem and push them to the
> + * kernel networking system
> + */
> +int ccmni_rx_push(unsigned int ccmni_idx, struct sk_buff *skb)
Ah, so this driver doesn't really do anything on its own, as there is no
modem driver for it.
So without a modem driver, it will never be used? Please submit the
modem driver at the same time, otherwise it's impossible to review this
correctly.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, chao.song@mediatek.com,
zhuoliang.zhang@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers: net: mediatek: initial implementation of ccmni
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:31:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNNv1AxDNBdPcQ1U@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210623113452.5671-4-rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 07:34:52PM +0800, Rocco Yue wrote:
> +static int ccmni_open(struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + netif_tx_start_all_queues(ccmni_dev);
> + netif_carrier_on(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + if (atomic_inc_return(&ccmni->usage) > 1) {
> + atomic_dec(&ccmni->usage);
> + netdev_err(ccmni_dev, "dev already open\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
You only check this _AFTER_ starting up? If so, why even check a count
at all? Why does it matter as it's not keeping anything from working
here.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccmni_close(struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + atomic_dec(&ccmni->usage);
> + netif_tx_disable(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static netdev_tx_t
> +ccmni_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = NULL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!ccmni_hook_ready))
> + goto tx_ok;
> +
> + if (!skb || !ccmni_dev)
> + goto tx_ok;
> +
> + ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + /* some process can modify ccmni_dev->mtu */
> + if (skb->len > ccmni_dev->mtu) {
> + netdev_err(ccmni_dev, "xmit fail: len(0x%x) > MTU(0x%x, 0x%x)",
> + skb->len, CCMNI_MTU, ccmni_dev->mtu);
> + goto tx_ok;
> + }
> +
> + /* hardware driver send packet will return a negative value
> + * ask the Linux netdevice to stop the tx queue
> + */
> + if ((s_ccmni_ctlb->xmit_pkt(ccmni->index, skb, 0)) < 0)
> + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> +
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +tx_ok:
> + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> + ccmni_dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccmni_change_mtu(struct net_device *ccmni_dev, int new_mtu)
> +{
> + if (new_mtu < 0 || new_mtu > CCMNI_MTU)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!ccmni_dev))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ccmni_dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ccmni_tx_timeout(struct net_device *ccmni_dev, unsigned int txqueue)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + ccmni_dev->stats.tx_errors++;
> + if (atomic_read(&ccmni->usage) > 0)
> + netif_tx_wake_all_queues(ccmni_dev);
Why does it matter what the reference count is? What happens if it
drops _RIGHT_ after testing for it?
Anytime you do an atomic_read() call, it's almost always a sign that the
logic is not correct.
Again, why have this reference count at all? What is it protecting?
> +/* exposed API
> + * receive incoming datagrams from the Modem and push them to the
> + * kernel networking system
> + */
> +int ccmni_rx_push(unsigned int ccmni_idx, struct sk_buff *skb)
Ah, so this driver doesn't really do anything on its own, as there is no
modem driver for it.
So without a modem driver, it will never be used? Please submit the
modem driver at the same time, otherwise it's impossible to review this
correctly.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, chao.song@mediatek.com,
zhuoliang.zhang@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers: net: mediatek: initial implementation of ccmni
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:31:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNNv1AxDNBdPcQ1U@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210623113452.5671-4-rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 07:34:52PM +0800, Rocco Yue wrote:
> +static int ccmni_open(struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + netif_tx_start_all_queues(ccmni_dev);
> + netif_carrier_on(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + if (atomic_inc_return(&ccmni->usage) > 1) {
> + atomic_dec(&ccmni->usage);
> + netdev_err(ccmni_dev, "dev already open\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
You only check this _AFTER_ starting up? If so, why even check a count
at all? Why does it matter as it's not keeping anything from working
here.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccmni_close(struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + atomic_dec(&ccmni->usage);
> + netif_tx_disable(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static netdev_tx_t
> +ccmni_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ccmni_dev)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = NULL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!ccmni_hook_ready))
> + goto tx_ok;
> +
> + if (!skb || !ccmni_dev)
> + goto tx_ok;
> +
> + ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + /* some process can modify ccmni_dev->mtu */
> + if (skb->len > ccmni_dev->mtu) {
> + netdev_err(ccmni_dev, "xmit fail: len(0x%x) > MTU(0x%x, 0x%x)",
> + skb->len, CCMNI_MTU, ccmni_dev->mtu);
> + goto tx_ok;
> + }
> +
> + /* hardware driver send packet will return a negative value
> + * ask the Linux netdevice to stop the tx queue
> + */
> + if ((s_ccmni_ctlb->xmit_pkt(ccmni->index, skb, 0)) < 0)
> + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> +
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +tx_ok:
> + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> + ccmni_dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccmni_change_mtu(struct net_device *ccmni_dev, int new_mtu)
> +{
> + if (new_mtu < 0 || new_mtu > CCMNI_MTU)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!ccmni_dev))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ccmni_dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ccmni_tx_timeout(struct net_device *ccmni_dev, unsigned int txqueue)
> +{
> + struct ccmni_inst *ccmni = netdev_priv(ccmni_dev);
> +
> + ccmni_dev->stats.tx_errors++;
> + if (atomic_read(&ccmni->usage) > 0)
> + netif_tx_wake_all_queues(ccmni_dev);
Why does it matter what the reference count is? What happens if it
drops _RIGHT_ after testing for it?
Anytime you do an atomic_read() call, it's almost always a sign that the
logic is not correct.
Again, why have this reference count at all? What is it protecting?
> +/* exposed API
> + * receive incoming datagrams from the Modem and push them to the
> + * kernel networking system
> + */
> +int ccmni_rx_push(unsigned int ccmni_idx, struct sk_buff *skb)
Ah, so this driver doesn't really do anything on its own, as there is no
modem driver for it.
So without a modem driver, it will never be used? Please submit the
modem driver at the same time, otherwise it's impossible to review this
correctly.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-23 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-23 11:34 [PATCH 1/4] net: if_arp: add ARPHRD_PUREIP type Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: ipv6: don't generate link local address on PUREIP device Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: dev_is_mac_header_xmit() return false for ARPHRD_PUREIP Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] drivers: net: mediatek: initial implementation of ccmni Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 11:34 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-23 17:25 ` Greg KH
2021-06-23 17:25 ` Greg KH
2021-06-23 17:25 ` Greg KH
2021-06-23 17:26 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-23 17:31 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-06-23 17:31 ` Greg KH
2021-06-23 17:31 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: if_arp: add ARPHRD_PUREIP type Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 11:53 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 11:53 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 12:23 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 12:23 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 12:23 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] drivers: net: mediatek: initial implementation of ccmni Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 15:55 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 15:55 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 16:51 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 16:51 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 16:51 ` Greg KH
2021-06-28 7:18 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-28 7:18 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-28 7:18 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-28 9:30 ` Greg KH
2021-06-28 9:30 ` Greg KH
2021-06-28 9:30 ` Greg KH
2021-06-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: if_arp: add ARPHRD_PUREIP type Greg KH
2021-06-23 17:19 ` Greg KH
2021-06-23 17:19 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 3:33 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 3:33 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 3:33 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 5:15 ` David Ahern
2021-06-24 5:15 ` David Ahern
2021-06-24 5:15 ` David Ahern
2021-06-24 5:31 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 5:31 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 5:31 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 5:29 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 5:29 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 5:29 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 6:13 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 6:13 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 6:13 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 9:04 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 9:04 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 9:04 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 12:24 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 12:24 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 12:24 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 13:06 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 13:06 ` Greg KH
2021-06-24 13:06 ` Greg KH
2021-06-25 6:01 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-25 6:01 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-25 6:01 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-24 16:14 ` Dan Williams
2021-06-24 16:14 ` Dan Williams
2021-06-24 16:14 ` Dan Williams
2021-06-25 6:04 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-25 6:04 ` Rocco Yue
2021-06-25 6:04 ` Rocco Yue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNNv1AxDNBdPcQ1U@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chao.song@mediatek.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rocco.yue@mediatek.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=zhuoliang.zhang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.