From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: hemantk@codeaurora.org, bbhatt@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loic.poulain@linaro.org,
kvalo@codeaurora.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] bus: mhi: core: Set BHI and BHIe pointers to NULL in clean-up
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:38:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNXOYkj9TWZgYAG3@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210625123355.11578-7-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 06:03:51PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> From: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
>
> Set the BHI and BHIe pointers to NULL as part of clean-up. This
> makes sure that stale pointers are not accessed after powering
> MHI down.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Why is this needed for stable, but patch 5/10 is not?
And what commit does this fix? How far back should it go?
And is this really fixing anything?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: hemantk@codeaurora.org, bbhatt@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loic.poulain@linaro.org,
kvalo@codeaurora.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] bus: mhi: core: Set BHI and BHIe pointers to NULL in clean-up
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:38:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNXOYkj9TWZgYAG3@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210625123355.11578-7-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 06:03:51PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> From: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
>
> Set the BHI and BHIe pointers to NULL as part of clean-up. This
> makes sure that stale pointers are not accessed after powering
> MHI down.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Why is this needed for stable, but patch 5/10 is not?
And what commit does this fix? How far back should it go?
And is this really fixing anything?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-25 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-25 12:33 [PATCH 00/10] MHI patches for v5.14 - Take 2 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 01/10] bus: mhi: Add inbound buffers allocation flag Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 02/10] bus: mhi: pci_generic: Apply no-op for wake using sideband wake boolean Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 03/10] bus: mhi: pci_generic: Add Cinterion MV31-W PCIe to MHI Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 04/10] bus: mhi: core: Validate channel ID when processing command completions Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 05/10] bus: mhi: core: Set BHI/BHIe offsets on power up preparation Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 06/10] bus: mhi: core: Set BHI and BHIe pointers to NULL in clean-up Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:38 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-06-25 12:38 ` Greg KH
2021-06-25 13:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 13:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 07/10] bus: mhi: Add MMIO region length to controller structure Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 08/10] ath11k: set register access length for MHI driver Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 09/10] bus: mhi: pci_generic: Set " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` [PATCH 10/10] bus: mhi: core: Add range checks for BHI and BHIe Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-25 12:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-30 13:16 ` [PATCH 00/10] MHI patches for v5.14 - Take 2 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-30 13:16 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-30 13:25 ` Greg KH
2021-06-30 13:25 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNXOYkj9TWZgYAG3@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_jhugo@quicinc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.