All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm: extend pfn_valid to take into accound freed memory map alignment
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:50:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNsXDEgreCpshZxb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNsJh7trg4up5l26@atomide.com>

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 02:52:39PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> [210629 10:51]:
> > As it seems, the new version of pfn_valid() decides that last pages are not
> > valid because of the overflow in memblock_overlaps_region(). As the result,
> > __sync_icache_dcache() skips flushing these pages.
> > 
> > The patch below should fix this. I've left the prints for now, hopefully
> > they will not appear anymore. 
> 
> Yes this allows the system to boot for me :)
> 
> I'm still seeing these three prints though:
> 
> ...
> smp: Brought up 1 node, 2 CPUs
> SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (3994.41 BogoMIPS).
> CPU: All CPU(s) started in SVC mode.
> pfn_valid(__pageblock_pfn_to_page+0x14/0xa8): pfn: afe00: is_map: 0 overlaps: 1
> pfn_valid(__pageblock_pfn_to_page+0x28/0xa8): pfn: affff: is_map: 0 overlaps: 1
> pfn_valid(__pageblock_pfn_to_page+0x38/0xa8): pfn: afe00: is_map: 0 overlaps: 1

These pfns do have memory map despite they are stolen in
arm_memblock_steal():

memblock_free: [0xaff00000-0xafffffff] arm_memblock_steal+0x50/0x70
memblock_remove: [0xaff00000-0xafffffff] arm_memblock_steal+0x5c/0x70
...
memblock_free: [0xafe00000-0xafefffff] arm_memblock_steal+0x50/0x70
memblock_remove: [0xafe00000-0xafefffff] arm_memblock_steal+0x5c/0x70

But the struct pages there are never initialized.

I'll resend v3 of the entire set with an addition patch to take care of
that as well.

> devtmpfs: initialized
> ...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > index 6162a070a410..7ba22d23eca4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > @@ -126,10 +126,16 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> >  {
> >  	phys_addr_t addr = __pfn_to_phys(pfn);
> >  	unsigned long pageblock_size = PAGE_SIZE * pageblock_nr_pages;
> > +	bool overlaps = memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory,
> > +				     ALIGN_DOWN(addr, pageblock_size),
> > +				     pageblock_size - 1);
> >  
> >  	if (__phys_to_pfn(addr) != pfn)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	if (memblock_is_map_memory(addr) != overlaps)
> > +		pr_info("%s(%pS): pfn: %lx: is_map: %d overlaps: %d\n", __func__, (void *)_RET_IP_, pfn, memblock_is_map_memory(addr), overlaps);
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If address less than pageblock_size bytes away from a present
> >  	 * memory chunk there still will be a memory map entry for it
> > @@ -137,7 +143,7 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory,
> >  				     ALIGN_DOWN(addr, pageblock_size),
> > -				     pageblock_size))
> > +				     pageblock_size - 1))
> >  		return 1;
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> > -- 
> > Sincerely yours,
> > Mike.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm: extend pfn_valid to take into accound freed memory map alignment
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:50:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNsXDEgreCpshZxb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNsJh7trg4up5l26@atomide.com>

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 02:52:39PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> [210629 10:51]:
> > As it seems, the new version of pfn_valid() decides that last pages are not
> > valid because of the overflow in memblock_overlaps_region(). As the result,
> > __sync_icache_dcache() skips flushing these pages.
> > 
> > The patch below should fix this. I've left the prints for now, hopefully
> > they will not appear anymore. 
> 
> Yes this allows the system to boot for me :)
> 
> I'm still seeing these three prints though:
> 
> ...
> smp: Brought up 1 node, 2 CPUs
> SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (3994.41 BogoMIPS).
> CPU: All CPU(s) started in SVC mode.
> pfn_valid(__pageblock_pfn_to_page+0x14/0xa8): pfn: afe00: is_map: 0 overlaps: 1
> pfn_valid(__pageblock_pfn_to_page+0x28/0xa8): pfn: affff: is_map: 0 overlaps: 1
> pfn_valid(__pageblock_pfn_to_page+0x38/0xa8): pfn: afe00: is_map: 0 overlaps: 1

These pfns do have memory map despite they are stolen in
arm_memblock_steal():

memblock_free: [0xaff00000-0xafffffff] arm_memblock_steal+0x50/0x70
memblock_remove: [0xaff00000-0xafffffff] arm_memblock_steal+0x5c/0x70
...
memblock_free: [0xafe00000-0xafefffff] arm_memblock_steal+0x50/0x70
memblock_remove: [0xafe00000-0xafefffff] arm_memblock_steal+0x5c/0x70

But the struct pages there are never initialized.

I'll resend v3 of the entire set with an addition patch to take care of
that as well.

> devtmpfs: initialized
> ...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > index 6162a070a410..7ba22d23eca4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> > @@ -126,10 +126,16 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> >  {
> >  	phys_addr_t addr = __pfn_to_phys(pfn);
> >  	unsigned long pageblock_size = PAGE_SIZE * pageblock_nr_pages;
> > +	bool overlaps = memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory,
> > +				     ALIGN_DOWN(addr, pageblock_size),
> > +				     pageblock_size - 1);
> >  
> >  	if (__phys_to_pfn(addr) != pfn)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	if (memblock_is_map_memory(addr) != overlaps)
> > +		pr_info("%s(%pS): pfn: %lx: is_map: %d overlaps: %d\n", __func__, (void *)_RET_IP_, pfn, memblock_is_map_memory(addr), overlaps);
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If address less than pageblock_size bytes away from a present
> >  	 * memory chunk there still will be a memory map entry for it
> > @@ -137,7 +143,7 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory,
> >  				     ALIGN_DOWN(addr, pageblock_size),
> > -				     pageblock_size))
> > +				     pageblock_size - 1))
> >  		return 1;
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> > -- 
> > Sincerely yours,
> > Mike.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-29 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 14:14 [PATCH v2 0/3] memblock, arm: fixes for freeing of the memory map Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19 14:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] memblock: free_unused_memmap: use pageblock units instead of MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19 14:14   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] memblock: align freed memory map on pageblock boundaries with SPARSEMEM Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19 14:14   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm: extend pfn_valid to take into accound freed memory map alignment Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19 14:14   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-28 10:20   ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-28 10:20     ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-28 13:16     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-28 13:16       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-28 15:26       ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-28 15:26         ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-29  5:33         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-29  5:33           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-29  8:54           ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-29  8:54             ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-29 10:50             ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-29 10:50               ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-29 11:52               ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-29 11:52                 ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-29 12:50                 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-06-29 12:50                   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-29 12:53                   ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-29 12:53                     ` Tony Lindgren
2021-06-30  7:20                   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-30  7:20                     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-20  6:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] memblock, arm: fixes for freeing of the memory map Kefeng Wang
2021-05-20  6:21   ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YNsXDEgreCpshZxb@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.