All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:36:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOxFdUCVTT9mFXtk@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vc1qU0sBbLOZdTgjJ_pfN73Utg4wtRV8Ohu-OiaeJuycg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:18:11AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:26 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> > > hence drop unnecessary duplication.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >
> > I think this should go into Russell's patch tracker for convenience,
> > if you're not familiar with it I can sign it off and put it in there,
> > just tell me.
> 
> Nope, I'm not. Please do, thanks!
> 
> Since he kept silent I suppose it means an agreement on the change.
> It's quite straightforward and can be tested easily.

Any new on this, please?

It's kinda not good when the (simplest) patch is stuck like this :-(

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:36:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOxFdUCVTT9mFXtk@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vc1qU0sBbLOZdTgjJ_pfN73Utg4wtRV8Ohu-OiaeJuycg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:18:11AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:26 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> > > hence drop unnecessary duplication.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >
> > I think this should go into Russell's patch tracker for convenience,
> > if you're not familiar with it I can sign it off and put it in there,
> > just tell me.
> 
> Nope, I'm not. Please do, thanks!
> 
> Since he kept silent I suppose it means an agreement on the change.
> It's quite straightforward and can be tested easily.

Any new on this, please?

It's kinda not good when the (simplest) patch is stuck like this :-(

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10 11:41 [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-10 11:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-19 23:25 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-19 23:25   ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-20  8:18   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20  8:18     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-12 13:36     ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-07-12 13:36       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-30  9:44       ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-30  9:44         ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-30 11:28         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-30 11:28           ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YOxFdUCVTT9mFXtk@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.