Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: __unmap_hugepage_range() can be static

[Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1121 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 01:05:24AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> mm/hugetlb.c:4334:6: warning: symbol '__unmap_hugepage_range' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
>  hugetlb.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 924553aa8f789ad..4bdd637b0c29a95 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4331,9 +4331,9 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> -			    unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> -			    struct page *ref_page)
> +static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +				   unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> +				   struct page *ref_page)
>  {
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
>  	unsigned long address;

Will squash this change into the patch.  Thanks.

-- 
Peter Xu