All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Wren Turkal <wt@penguintechs.org>,
	ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	Hemant Kumar <hemantk@codeaurora.org>,
	Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Subject: Re: [regression] Re: 5.14 rc6 broken for QCA6390 on Dell XPS 13 9310
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:38:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSenaxWzxRkYkucv@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtp47073.fsf_-_@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 05:25:04PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (Adding Linus and Greg)
> 
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:
> 
> > (Adding Dave and Jakub to CC)
> >
> > Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> writes:
> >
> >> On 23/08/2021 14:53, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >>> (adding linux-wireless, regressions and some mhi folks)
> >>> 
> >>> Wren Turkal <wt@penguintechs.org> writes:
> >>> 
> >>>> I have no device for the wifi on my computer. 5.13 worked pretty well.
> >>>> I also found others reporting similar issues:
> >>>> https://forum.manjaro.org/t/kernel5-14-rc6-ath11k-on-qca6390-regression-mhi-probe-failure/79362
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's info about the hardware on my laptop:
> >>>> ➜  ~ sudo dmidecode -s system-product-name
> >>>> XPS 13 9310
> >>>>
> >>>> ➜  ~ sudo dmidecode -s bios-version
> >>>> 3.0.4
> >>> 
> >>> Do you get the same mhi error as in the forum post?
> >>> 
> >>> qcom_mhi_qrtr: probe of mhi0_IPCR failed with error -22
> >>> 
> >>> MHI folks, any ideas? I have XPS 13 9310 myself but I'm not able to test
> >>> v5.14-rc6 kernel right now.
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have hit the same issue on Linux 5.14-rc7:
> >>
> >> [   14.780566] qcom_mhi_qrtr: probe of mhi0_IPCR failed with error -22
> >>
> >> This looks to be caused by commit:
> >>
> >> ce78ffa3ef16 net: really fix the build...
> >>
> >> Reverting this commit results in ath11k being able to load without errors.
> >
> > Thanks, this helps a lot. Commit ce78ffa3ef16 was introduced in
> > v5.14-rc5 so I assume that's the first release which broke ath11k.
> >
> > Dave, what build issue did you fix with commit ce78ffa3ef16? Could we
> > revert the commit? The problem is that, unless we fix this issue, with
> > v5.14 WLAN will be broken on a quite few newer Dell laptops.
> 
> I did some investiation and I suspect that commit ce78ffa3ef16 ("net:
> really fix the build...")[1] is for handling a conflict between net-next
> and char-misc-next trees related to Loic's commit 0092a1e3f763 ("bus:
> mhi: Add inbound buffers allocation flag"). Greg mentions this in a
> commit[2]:
> 
> commit 813272ed5238b37c81e448b302048e8008570121
> Merge: de0534df9347 36a21d51725a
> Author:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
>     Merge 5.14-rc5 into char-misc-next
>     
>     We need the fixes in here as well, and resolves some merge issues with
>     the mhi codebase.
> 
> If my assumption is correct when I propose that we revert commit
> ce78ffa3ef16 for v5.14, AFAICS it's not really needed for v5.14 (commit
> 0092a1e3f763 is in -next, not in Linus' tree yet) and commit
> ce78ffa3ef16 breaks ath11k. And the conflict between net-next and
> char-misc-next can be then later fixed during the merge window.
> 
> Will this work for everyone? If no objections, I'll submit the revert to
> Linus later today. We are getting really close to final v5.14 release so
> not much time left to fix this.
> 
> Just to reiterate why the urgency: commit ce78ffa3ef16 broke ath11k in
> v5.14-rc5, users have reported (and I have confirmed) that at least
> QCA6390 support is broken but I suspect all Qualcomm Wi-Fi 6 devices
> supported by ath11k are currently broken.

No objection from me for reverting that, if it fixes the problems you
are seeing for 5.14-final.

The goal was for the mhi changes to go through the networking tree in
the first place, I don't see how this got out of sync.

If this is reverted, some help on how to resolve the merge issues it
will cause would be appreciated.

thanks,

greg k-h

-- 
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Wren Turkal <wt@penguintechs.org>,
	ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	Hemant Kumar <hemantk@codeaurora.org>,
	Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Subject: Re: [regression] Re: 5.14 rc6 broken for QCA6390 on Dell XPS 13 9310
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:38:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSenaxWzxRkYkucv@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtp47073.fsf_-_@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 05:25:04PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (Adding Linus and Greg)
> 
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:
> 
> > (Adding Dave and Jakub to CC)
> >
> > Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> writes:
> >
> >> On 23/08/2021 14:53, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >>> (adding linux-wireless, regressions and some mhi folks)
> >>> 
> >>> Wren Turkal <wt@penguintechs.org> writes:
> >>> 
> >>>> I have no device for the wifi on my computer. 5.13 worked pretty well.
> >>>> I also found others reporting similar issues:
> >>>> https://forum.manjaro.org/t/kernel5-14-rc6-ath11k-on-qca6390-regression-mhi-probe-failure/79362
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's info about the hardware on my laptop:
> >>>> ➜  ~ sudo dmidecode -s system-product-name
> >>>> XPS 13 9310
> >>>>
> >>>> ➜  ~ sudo dmidecode -s bios-version
> >>>> 3.0.4
> >>> 
> >>> Do you get the same mhi error as in the forum post?
> >>> 
> >>> qcom_mhi_qrtr: probe of mhi0_IPCR failed with error -22
> >>> 
> >>> MHI folks, any ideas? I have XPS 13 9310 myself but I'm not able to test
> >>> v5.14-rc6 kernel right now.
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have hit the same issue on Linux 5.14-rc7:
> >>
> >> [   14.780566] qcom_mhi_qrtr: probe of mhi0_IPCR failed with error -22
> >>
> >> This looks to be caused by commit:
> >>
> >> ce78ffa3ef16 net: really fix the build...
> >>
> >> Reverting this commit results in ath11k being able to load without errors.
> >
> > Thanks, this helps a lot. Commit ce78ffa3ef16 was introduced in
> > v5.14-rc5 so I assume that's the first release which broke ath11k.
> >
> > Dave, what build issue did you fix with commit ce78ffa3ef16? Could we
> > revert the commit? The problem is that, unless we fix this issue, with
> > v5.14 WLAN will be broken on a quite few newer Dell laptops.
> 
> I did some investiation and I suspect that commit ce78ffa3ef16 ("net:
> really fix the build...")[1] is for handling a conflict between net-next
> and char-misc-next trees related to Loic's commit 0092a1e3f763 ("bus:
> mhi: Add inbound buffers allocation flag"). Greg mentions this in a
> commit[2]:
> 
> commit 813272ed5238b37c81e448b302048e8008570121
> Merge: de0534df9347 36a21d51725a
> Author:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
>     Merge 5.14-rc5 into char-misc-next
>     
>     We need the fixes in here as well, and resolves some merge issues with
>     the mhi codebase.
> 
> If my assumption is correct when I propose that we revert commit
> ce78ffa3ef16 for v5.14, AFAICS it's not really needed for v5.14 (commit
> 0092a1e3f763 is in -next, not in Linus' tree yet) and commit
> ce78ffa3ef16 breaks ath11k. And the conflict between net-next and
> char-misc-next can be then later fixed during the merge window.
> 
> Will this work for everyone? If no objections, I'll submit the revert to
> Linus later today. We are getting really close to final v5.14 release so
> not much time left to fix this.
> 
> Just to reiterate why the urgency: commit ce78ffa3ef16 broke ath11k in
> v5.14-rc5, users have reported (and I have confirmed) that at least
> QCA6390 support is broken but I suspect all Qualcomm Wi-Fi 6 devices
> supported by ath11k are currently broken.

No objection from me for reverting that, if it fixes the problems you
are seeing for 5.14-final.

The goal was for the mhi changes to go through the networking tree in
the first place, I don't see how this got out of sync.

If this is reverted, some help on how to resolve the merge issues it
will cause would be appreciated.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-26 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-22 21:08 5.14 rc6 broken for QCA6390 on Dell XPS 13 9310 Wren Turkal
2021-08-23 12:53 ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-23 12:53   ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-23 16:02   ` Nicolas Schichan
2021-08-23 16:02     ` Nicolas Schichan
2021-08-23 17:40     ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-23 17:40       ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-26 14:25       ` [regression] " Kalle Valo
2021-08-26 14:25         ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-26 14:38         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-08-26 14:38           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-08-26 14:48           ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-26 14:48             ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-26 15:00             ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-26 15:00               ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-26 17:33               ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-26 17:33                 ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-26 18:12                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-26 18:12                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-27 12:41                   ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-27 12:41                     ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-30 16:04                     ` Nicolas Schichan
2021-08-30 16:04                       ` Nicolas Schichan
2021-08-31 10:37                       ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-31 10:37                         ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-27 12:46           ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-27 12:46             ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-23 16:17   ` Wren Turkal
2021-08-23 16:17     ` Wren Turkal
2021-08-27 12:43     ` Kalle Valo
2021-08-27 12:43       ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YSenaxWzxRkYkucv@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=nschichan@freebox.fr \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=wt@penguintechs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.