From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: don't ignore writing pages on fsync during checkpoint=disable
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:52:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSfGwKtGhutsTJ8x@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YSa3DPBIFZ5P17vt@google.com>
From 64fe93a7f9c35c2b5a34cfa3cf84158852c201be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:00:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: guarantee to write dirty data when enabling checkpoint
back
We must flush all the dirty data when enabling checkpoint back. Let's guarantee
that first by adding a retry logic on sync_inodes_sb(). In addition to that,
this patch adds to flush data in fsync when checkpoint is disabled, which can
mitigate the sync_inodes_sb() failures in advance.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
Change log from v2:
- repharse the patch description a bit
- fix retry condition check
fs/f2fs/file.c | 5 ++---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 ++++++++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index cc2080866c54..3330efb41f22 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -263,8 +263,7 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
};
unsigned int seq_id = 0;
- if (unlikely(f2fs_readonly(inode->i_sb) ||
- is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
+ if (unlikely(f2fs_readonly(inode->i_sb)))
return 0;
trace_f2fs_sync_file_enter(inode);
@@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret || is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
trace_f2fs_sync_file_exit(inode, cp_reason, datasync, ret);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 49e153fd8183..b8fecf4f37e0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -2088,8 +2088,17 @@ static int f2fs_disable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
static void f2fs_enable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
+ int retry = DEFAULT_RETRY_IO_COUNT;
+
/* we should flush all the data to keep data consistency */
- sync_inodes_sb(sbi->sb);
+ do {
+ sync_inodes_sb(sbi->sb);
+ cond_resched();
+ congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT);
+ } while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DATA) && retry--);
+
+ if (unlikely(retry < 0))
+ f2fs_warn(sbi, "checkpoint=enable has some unwritten data.");
down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
f2fs_dirty_to_prefree(sbi);
--
2.33.0.rc2.250.ged5fa647cd-goog
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: don't ignore writing pages on fsync during checkpoint=disable
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:52:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSfGwKtGhutsTJ8x@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YSa3DPBIFZ5P17vt@google.com>
From 64fe93a7f9c35c2b5a34cfa3cf84158852c201be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:00:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: guarantee to write dirty data when enabling checkpoint
back
We must flush all the dirty data when enabling checkpoint back. Let's guarantee
that first by adding a retry logic on sync_inodes_sb(). In addition to that,
this patch adds to flush data in fsync when checkpoint is disabled, which can
mitigate the sync_inodes_sb() failures in advance.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
Change log from v2:
- repharse the patch description a bit
- fix retry condition check
fs/f2fs/file.c | 5 ++---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 ++++++++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index cc2080866c54..3330efb41f22 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -263,8 +263,7 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
};
unsigned int seq_id = 0;
- if (unlikely(f2fs_readonly(inode->i_sb) ||
- is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
+ if (unlikely(f2fs_readonly(inode->i_sb)))
return 0;
trace_f2fs_sync_file_enter(inode);
@@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret || is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
trace_f2fs_sync_file_exit(inode, cp_reason, datasync, ret);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 49e153fd8183..b8fecf4f37e0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -2088,8 +2088,17 @@ static int f2fs_disable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
static void f2fs_enable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
+ int retry = DEFAULT_RETRY_IO_COUNT;
+
/* we should flush all the data to keep data consistency */
- sync_inodes_sb(sbi->sb);
+ do {
+ sync_inodes_sb(sbi->sb);
+ cond_resched();
+ congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT);
+ } while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DATA) && retry--);
+
+ if (unlikely(retry < 0))
+ f2fs_warn(sbi, "checkpoint=enable has some unwritten data.");
down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
f2fs_dirty_to_prefree(sbi);
--
2.33.0.rc2.250.ged5fa647cd-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 17:01 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't ignore writing pages on fsync during checkpoint=disable Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-23 17:01 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-24 1:08 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2021-08-24 1:08 ` Chao Yu
2021-08-24 17:09 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-24 17:09 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-24 23:30 ` Chao Yu
2021-08-24 23:30 ` Chao Yu
2021-08-25 21:31 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-25 21:31 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-25 21:33 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-25 21:33 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-26 0:16 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2021-08-26 0:16 ` Chao Yu
2021-08-26 16:52 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2021-08-26 16:52 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-27 14:36 ` Chao Yu
2021-08-27 14:36 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YSfGwKtGhutsTJ8x@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.