Re: [PATCH 2/5] platform/x86/intel: Move intel_pmt from MFD to Auxiliary Bus

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 01:58:22PM -0700, David E. Box wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 11:58 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 06:28:12PM -0700, David E. Box wrote:
> > > Intel Platform Monitoring Technology (PMT) support is indicated by presence
> > > of an Intel defined PCIe DVSEC structure with a PMT ID. However DVSEC
> > > structures may also be used by Intel to indicate support for other
> > > capabilities unrelated to PMT.  The Out Of Band Management Services Module
> > > (OOBMSM) is an example of a device that can have both PMT and non-PMT
> > > capabilities. In order to support these capabilities it is necessary to
> > > modify the intel_pmt driver to handle the creation of platform devices more
> > > generically. To that end the following changes are made.
> > > 
> > > Convert the driver and child drivers from MFD to the Auxiliary Bus. This
> > > architecture is more suitable anyway since the driver partitions a
> > > multifunctional PCIe device. This also moves the driver out of the MFD
> > > subsystem and into platform/x86/intel.
> > > 
> > > Before, devices were named by their capability (e.g. pmt_telemetry).
> > > Instead, generically name them by their capability ID (e.g.
> > > intel_extended_cap.2). This allows the IDs to be created automatically,
> > > minimizing the code needed to support future capabilities. However, to
> > > ensure that unsupported devices aren't created, use an allow list to
> > > specify supported capabilities. Along these lines, rename the driver from
> > > intel_pmt to intel_extended_caps to better reflect the purpose.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > V1:     New patch. However incorporates some elements of [1] which was
> > >         dropped. Namely enumerating features generically and creating an
> > >         allow list. Also cleans up probe by moving some code to functions
> > >         and using a bool instead of an int to track whether a device was
> > >         added.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210922213007.2738388-3-david.e.box@linux.intel.com/
> > 
> > <...>
> > 
> > > +static int extended_caps_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct extended_caps_platform_info *info;
> > > +       bool have_devices = false;
> > > +       unsigned long quirks = 0;
> > > +       int ret;
> > > +
> > > +       ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               return ret;
> > > +
> > > +       info = (struct extended_caps_platform_info *)id->driver_data;
> > 
> > pci_get_drvdata() in all places and no need to cast void *.
> 
> This is coming from the id not the pdev. The data here is type kernel_ulong_t.

Ohh, this is very unusual.

Thanks