From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: arm64: fix section mismatch warning
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:30:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWW4KrbVfPeUikAL@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <988fa24c-76d2-1c9d-9761-b356efb0576c@huawei.com>
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:03:29PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 2021/9/27 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > In a gcc-11 randconfig build I came across this warning:
> >
> > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c084): Section mismatch in reference from the function next_platform_timer() to the variable .init.data:acpi_gtdt_desc
> > The function next_platform_timer() references
> > the variable __initdata acpi_gtdt_desc.
> > This is often because next_platform_timer lacks a __initdata
> > annotation or the annotation of acpi_gtdt_desc is wrong.
> >
> > This happens when next_platform_timer() fails to get inlined
> > despite the inline annotation. Adding '__init' solves the issue,
> > and it seems best to remove the 'inline' in the process seems
> > better anyway.
>
> There was a patch to fix this issue as well [1],
> but not merged yet.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/7f29a149-e005-f13f-2cc4-a9eb737107e1@huawei.com/T/
I haven't seen this one, it was on linux-acpi list which I don't follow.
I usually rely you, Lorenzo or Sudeep to ack such patches and cc
Will/me.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: arm64: fix section mismatch warning
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:30:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWW4KrbVfPeUikAL@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <988fa24c-76d2-1c9d-9761-b356efb0576c@huawei.com>
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:03:29PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 2021/9/27 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > In a gcc-11 randconfig build I came across this warning:
> >
> > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c084): Section mismatch in reference from the function next_platform_timer() to the variable .init.data:acpi_gtdt_desc
> > The function next_platform_timer() references
> > the variable __initdata acpi_gtdt_desc.
> > This is often because next_platform_timer lacks a __initdata
> > annotation or the annotation of acpi_gtdt_desc is wrong.
> >
> > This happens when next_platform_timer() fails to get inlined
> > despite the inline annotation. Adding '__init' solves the issue,
> > and it seems best to remove the 'inline' in the process seems
> > better anyway.
>
> There was a patch to fix this issue as well [1],
> but not merged yet.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/7f29a149-e005-f13f-2cc4-a9eb737107e1@huawei.com/T/
I haven't seen this one, it was on linux-acpi list which I don't follow.
I usually rely you, Lorenzo or Sudeep to ack such patches and cc
Will/me.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-12 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-27 14:19 [PATCH] acpi: arm64: fix section mismatch warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-27 14:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-12 7:03 ` Hanjun Guo
2021-10-12 7:03 ` Hanjun Guo
2021-10-12 7:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-12 7:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-12 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-12 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-12 16:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-10-12 16:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-10-12 16:30 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-10-12 16:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-10-13 9:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-10-13 9:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-10-15 8:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2021-10-15 8:53 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YWW4KrbVfPeUikAL@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.