From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us,
mkubecek@suse.cz, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ethtool: don't drop the rtnl_lock half way thru the ioctl
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 08:31:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YX44VqMfYDaDFi5r@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211030171851.1822583-5-kuba@kernel.org>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 10:18:51AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> devlink compat code needs to drop rtnl_lock to take
> devlink->lock to ensure correct lock ordering.
>
> This is problematic because we're not strictly guaranteed
> that the netdev will not disappear after we re-lock.
> It may open a possibility of nested ->begin / ->complete
> calls.
>
> Instead of calling into devlink under rtnl_lock take
> a ref on the devlink instance and make the call after
> we've dropped rtnl_lock.
>
> We (continue to) assume that netdevs have an implicit
> reference on the devlink returned from ndo_get_devlink_port
>
> Note that ndo_get_devlink_port will now get called
> under rtnl_lock. That should be fine since none of
> the drivers seem to be taking serious locks inside
> ndo_get_devlink_port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/net/devlink.h | 8 ++++----
> net/core/devlink.c | 45 +++++++------------------------------------
> net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-31 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-30 17:18 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] improve ethtool/rtnl vs devlink locking Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-30 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] ethtool: push the rtnl_lock into dev_ethtool() Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-31 6:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-10-30 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] ethtool: handle info/flash data copying outside rtnl_lock Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-31 6:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-10-30 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] devlink: expose get/put functions Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-31 6:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-01 13:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-01 18:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-10-30 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ethtool: don't drop the rtnl_lock half way thru the ioctl Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-31 6:31 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-11-01 13:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] improve ethtool/rtnl vs devlink locking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YX44VqMfYDaDFi5r@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.