All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 2/5] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:10:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXj7WkEb0PagWfSw@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026173146.1031412-3-maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Maciej Machnikowski wrote:
> +/* SyncE section */
> +
> +enum if_eec_state {
> +	IF_EEC_STATE_INVALID = 0,
> +	IF_EEC_STATE_FREERUN,
> +	IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED,
> +	IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED_HO_ACQ,

Is this referring to "Locked mode, acquiring holdover: This is a
temporary mode, when coming from free-run, to acquire holdover memory."
?

It seems ice isn't using it, so maybe drop it? Can be added later in
case we have a driver that can report it

There is also "Locked mode, holdover acquired: This is a steady state
mode, entered when holdover memory is acquired." But I assume that's
"IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED"

> +	IF_EEC_STATE_HOLDOVER,
> +};

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Maciej Machnikowski <maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, abyagowi@fb.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, mkubecek@suse.cz,
	saeed@kernel.org, michael.chan@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 net-next 2/5] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:10:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXj7WkEb0PagWfSw@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026173146.1031412-3-maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Maciej Machnikowski wrote:
> +/* SyncE section */
> +
> +enum if_eec_state {
> +	IF_EEC_STATE_INVALID = 0,
> +	IF_EEC_STATE_FREERUN,
> +	IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED,
> +	IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED_HO_ACQ,

Is this referring to "Locked mode, acquiring holdover: This is a
temporary mode, when coming from free-run, to acquire holdover memory."
?

It seems ice isn't using it, so maybe drop it? Can be added later in
case we have a driver that can report it

There is also "Locked mode, holdover acquired: This is a steady state
mode, entered when holdover memory is acquired." But I assume that's
"IF_EEC_STATE_LOCKED"

> +	IF_EEC_STATE_HOLDOVER,
> +};

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-27  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-26 17:31 [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 0/5] Add RTNL interface for SyncE Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31 ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 1/5] ice: add support detecting features based on netlist Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31   ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 2/5] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31   ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-27  7:10   ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2021-10-27  7:10     ` Ido Schimmel
2021-10-27 13:16     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-27 13:16       ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-27 15:10       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Ido Schimmel
2021-10-27 15:10         ` Ido Schimmel
2021-10-28  6:34         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-28  6:34           ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-26 17:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 3/5] ice: add support for reading SyncE DPLL state Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31   ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 4/5] rtnetlink: Add support for SyncE recovered clock configuration Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31   ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 21:32   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-26 21:32     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-27 13:29     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-27 13:29       ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-27 14:40       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-27 14:40         ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-26 17:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 5/5] ice: add support for SyncE recovered clocks Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-26 17:31   ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-10-27  6:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v5 net-next 0/5] Add RTNL interface for SyncE Ido Schimmel
2021-10-27  6:50   ` Ido Schimmel
2021-10-27 13:21   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-27 13:21     ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-27 15:05     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Ido Schimmel
2021-10-27 15:05       ` Ido Schimmel
2021-10-28  6:32       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-10-28  6:32         ` Machnikowski, Maciej

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YXj7WkEb0PagWfSw@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.