From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:01:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YY0+PmNU4MSGfgqA@hog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110114448.2792314-3-maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>
Hello Maciej,
2021-11-10, 12:44:44 +0100, Maciej Machnikowski wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> index 5888492a5257..1d8662afd6bd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ enum {
> RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET,
> #define RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET
>
> + RTM_GETEECSTATE = 124,
> +#define RTM_GETEECSTATE RTM_GETEECSTATE
I'm not sure about this. All the other RTM_GETxxx are such that
RTM_GETxxx % 4 == 2. Following the current pattern, 124 should be
reserved for RTM_NEWxxx, and RTM_GETEECSTATE would be 126.
Also, why are you leaving a gap (which you end up filling in patch
4/6)?
> +
> __RTM_MAX,
> #define RTM_MAX (((__RTM_MAX + 3) & ~3) - 1)
> };
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 2af8aeeadadf..03bc773d0e69 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -5467,6 +5467,83 @@ static int rtnl_stats_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> return skb->len;
> }
>
> +static int rtnl_fill_eec_state(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> + u32 portid, u32 seq, struct netlink_callback *cb,
> + int flags, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
[...]
> + nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, RTM_GETEECSTATE, sizeof(*state_msg),
> + flags);
> + if (!nlh)
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> + state_msg = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> + state_msg->ifindex = dev->ifindex;
Why stuff this in a struct instead of using an attribute?
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_EEC_STATE, state))
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> + if (!ops->ndo_get_eec_src)
> + goto end_msg;
> +
> + err = ops->ndo_get_eec_src(dev, &src_idx, extack);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_EEC_SRC_IDX, src_idx))
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +end_msg:
> + nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Thanks,
--
Sabrina
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Maciej Machnikowski <maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
richardcochran@gmail.com, abyagowi@fb.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, idosch@idosch.org,
mkubecek@suse.cz, saeed@kernel.org, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
petrm@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:01:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YY0+PmNU4MSGfgqA@hog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110114448.2792314-3-maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>
Hello Maciej,
2021-11-10, 12:44:44 +0100, Maciej Machnikowski wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> index 5888492a5257..1d8662afd6bd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ enum {
> RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET,
> #define RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET
>
> + RTM_GETEECSTATE = 124,
> +#define RTM_GETEECSTATE RTM_GETEECSTATE
I'm not sure about this. All the other RTM_GETxxx are such that
RTM_GETxxx % 4 == 2. Following the current pattern, 124 should be
reserved for RTM_NEWxxx, and RTM_GETEECSTATE would be 126.
Also, why are you leaving a gap (which you end up filling in patch
4/6)?
> +
> __RTM_MAX,
> #define RTM_MAX (((__RTM_MAX + 3) & ~3) - 1)
> };
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 2af8aeeadadf..03bc773d0e69 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -5467,6 +5467,83 @@ static int rtnl_stats_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> return skb->len;
> }
>
> +static int rtnl_fill_eec_state(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> + u32 portid, u32 seq, struct netlink_callback *cb,
> + int flags, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
[...]
> + nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, RTM_GETEECSTATE, sizeof(*state_msg),
> + flags);
> + if (!nlh)
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> + state_msg = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> + state_msg->ifindex = dev->ifindex;
Why stuff this in a struct instead of using an attribute?
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_EEC_STATE, state))
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> + if (!ops->ndo_get_eec_src)
> + goto end_msg;
> +
> + err = ops->ndo_get_eec_src(dev, &src_idx, extack);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_EEC_SRC_IDX, src_idx))
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +end_msg:
> + nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Thanks,
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 11:44 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 0/6] Add RTNL interface for SyncE Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 1/6] ice: add support detecting features based on netlist Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-11 16:01 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2021-11-11 16:01 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2021-11-11 16:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Florian Westphal
2021-11-11 16:22 ` Florian Westphal
2021-11-16 14:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-16 14:40 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-16 15:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Florian Westphal
2021-11-16 15:41 ` Florian Westphal
2021-11-16 19:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-16 19:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-16 14:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-16 14:37 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 3/6] ice: add support for reading SyncE DPLL state Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 4/6] rtnetlink: Add support for SyncE recovered clock configuration Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 5/6] ice: add support for SyncE recovered clocks Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 6/6] docs: net: Add description of SyncE interfaces Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-11 12:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Petr Machata
2021-11-11 12:43 ` Petr Machata
2021-11-15 10:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-15 10:24 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-16 11:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Petr Machata
2021-11-16 11:07 ` Petr Machata
2021-11-16 11:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Petr Machata
2021-11-16 11:52 ` Petr Machata
2021-11-16 14:26 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-16 14:26 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YY0+PmNU4MSGfgqA@hog \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.