Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: Move wiping of the kvm->vcpus array to common code

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Fri, Nov 05, 2021, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> All architectures have similar loops iterating over the vcpus,
> freeing one vcpu at a time, and eventually wiping the reference
> off the vcpus array. They are also inconsistently taking
> the kvm->lock mutex when wiping the references from the array.

...

> +void kvm_destroy_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> +		kvm_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);

But why is kvm->lock taken here?  Unless I'm overlooking an arch, everyone calls
this from kvm_arch_destroy_vm(), in which case this is the only remaining reference
to @kvm.  And if there's some magic path for which that's not true, I don't see how
it can possibly be safe to call kvm_vcpu_destroy() without holding kvm->lock, or
how this would guarantee that all vCPUs have actually been destroyed before nullifying
the array.

> +	for (i = 0; i < atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus); i++)
> +		kvm->vcpus[i] = NULL;
> +
> +	atomic_set(&kvm->online_vcpus, 0);
> +	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_destroy_vcpus);
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm