All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	cujomalainey@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:26:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ8snZR/KHLDhIlf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43976e8aab2e3055195d8e9c2f466a804e4d2ba7.camel@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:47:22AM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 18:25 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 04:45:14PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> > > +		chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> > > +		if (!chan_name)
> > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +		dsp_chan = &dsp_ipc->chans[i];
> > > +		cl = &dsp_chan->cl;
> > > +		cl->dev = dev->parent;
> > > +		cl->tx_block = false;
> > > +		cl->knows_txdone = false;
> > > +		cl->tx_prepare = NULL;
> > > +		cl->rx_callback = adsp_ipc_recv;
> > > +
> > > +		dsp_chan->ipc = dsp_ipc;
> > > +		dsp_chan->idx = i;
> > > +		dsp_chan->ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl,
> > > chan_name);
> > > +		if (IS_ERR(dsp_chan->ch)) {
> > > +			ret = PTR_ERR(dsp_chan->ch);
> > > +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to request mbox
> > > chan %d ret %d\n",
> > > +					i, ret);
> > 
> > If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, wouldn't it need to return
> > -EPROBE_DEFER?  It doesn't retry later if -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> If ret != -EPROBE_DEFER, it will show a error message then goto out.
> 
> If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, probe funcation also will goto out. 
> 
> 
> Both of them will return ret. will not go to next round.

I see.  I misunderstood.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	cujomalainey@google.com,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:26:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ8snZR/KHLDhIlf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43976e8aab2e3055195d8e9c2f466a804e4d2ba7.camel@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:47:22AM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 18:25 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 04:45:14PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> > > +		chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> > > +		if (!chan_name)
> > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +		dsp_chan = &dsp_ipc->chans[i];
> > > +		cl = &dsp_chan->cl;
> > > +		cl->dev = dev->parent;
> > > +		cl->tx_block = false;
> > > +		cl->knows_txdone = false;
> > > +		cl->tx_prepare = NULL;
> > > +		cl->rx_callback = adsp_ipc_recv;
> > > +
> > > +		dsp_chan->ipc = dsp_ipc;
> > > +		dsp_chan->idx = i;
> > > +		dsp_chan->ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl,
> > > chan_name);
> > > +		if (IS_ERR(dsp_chan->ch)) {
> > > +			ret = PTR_ERR(dsp_chan->ch);
> > > +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to request mbox
> > > chan %d ret %d\n",
> > > +					i, ret);
> > 
> > If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, wouldn't it need to return
> > -EPROBE_DEFER?  It doesn't retry later if -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> If ret != -EPROBE_DEFER, it will show a error message then goto out.
> 
> If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, probe funcation also will goto out. 
> 
> 
> Both of them will return ret. will not go to next round.

I see.  I misunderstood.

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	cujomalainey@google.com,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:26:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ8snZR/KHLDhIlf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43976e8aab2e3055195d8e9c2f466a804e4d2ba7.camel@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:47:22AM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 18:25 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 04:45:14PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> > > +		chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> > > +		if (!chan_name)
> > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +		dsp_chan = &dsp_ipc->chans[i];
> > > +		cl = &dsp_chan->cl;
> > > +		cl->dev = dev->parent;
> > > +		cl->tx_block = false;
> > > +		cl->knows_txdone = false;
> > > +		cl->tx_prepare = NULL;
> > > +		cl->rx_callback = adsp_ipc_recv;
> > > +
> > > +		dsp_chan->ipc = dsp_ipc;
> > > +		dsp_chan->idx = i;
> > > +		dsp_chan->ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl,
> > > chan_name);
> > > +		if (IS_ERR(dsp_chan->ch)) {
> > > +			ret = PTR_ERR(dsp_chan->ch);
> > > +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to request mbox
> > > chan %d ret %d\n",
> > > +					i, ret);
> > 
> > If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, wouldn't it need to return
> > -EPROBE_DEFER?  It doesn't retry later if -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> If ret != -EPROBE_DEFER, it will show a error message then goto out.
> 
> If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, probe funcation also will goto out. 
> 
> 
> Both of them will return ret. will not go to next round.

I see.  I misunderstood.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
To: "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	cujomalainey@google.com,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:26:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ8snZR/KHLDhIlf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43976e8aab2e3055195d8e9c2f466a804e4d2ba7.camel@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:47:22AM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 18:25 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 04:45:14PM +0800, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < MTK_ADSP_MBOX_NUM; i++) {
> > > +		chan_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "mbox%d", i);
> > > +		if (!chan_name)
> > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +		dsp_chan = &dsp_ipc->chans[i];
> > > +		cl = &dsp_chan->cl;
> > > +		cl->dev = dev->parent;
> > > +		cl->tx_block = false;
> > > +		cl->knows_txdone = false;
> > > +		cl->tx_prepare = NULL;
> > > +		cl->rx_callback = adsp_ipc_recv;
> > > +
> > > +		dsp_chan->ipc = dsp_ipc;
> > > +		dsp_chan->idx = i;
> > > +		dsp_chan->ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl,
> > > chan_name);
> > > +		if (IS_ERR(dsp_chan->ch)) {
> > > +			ret = PTR_ERR(dsp_chan->ch);
> > > +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to request mbox
> > > chan %d ret %d\n",
> > > +					i, ret);
> > 
> > If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, wouldn't it need to return
> > -EPROBE_DEFER?  It doesn't retry later if -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> If ret != -EPROBE_DEFER, it will show a error message then goto out.
> 
> If ret == -EPROBE_DEFER, probe funcation also will goto out. 
> 
> 
> Both of them will return ret. will not go to next round.

I see.  I misunderstood.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-24  8:45 [PATCH v3 0/3] This patches provide ADSP IPC support for MT8195 allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45 ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45 ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek: add adsp-mbox document allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mailbox: mediatek: add support for adsp mailbox controller allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24 10:25   ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-24 10:25     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-24 10:25     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-24 10:25     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25  1:51     ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25  1:51       ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25  1:51       ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25  6:23       ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25  6:23         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25  6:23         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25  6:23         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25  8:24         ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25  8:24           ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25  8:24           ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware: mediatek: add adsp ipc protocol interface allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24  8:45   ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-24 10:25   ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-24 10:25     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-24 10:25     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-24 10:25     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25  1:47     ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25  1:47       ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25  1:47       ` allen-kh.cheng
2021-11-25  6:26       ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2021-11-25  6:26         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25  6:26         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2021-11-25  6:26         ` Tzung-Bi Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZ8snZR/KHLDhIlf@google.com \
    --to=tzungbi@google.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.