From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: "Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Justin Chen" <justinpopo6@gmail.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:44:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya+BX1X7/YqmfCU8@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a86d5998-8d84-7afe-e34e-a632aa890683@roeck-us.net>
On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 12/7/21 2:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that
> >
> > Not exactly, I said:
> >
> > "> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well.
> >
> > If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch."
> >
> > The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable
> > branch to you, which I am in a position to do.
> >
>
> I understand, only I am not in a position to take it since my tree
> isn't the official watchdog-next tree, and it doesn't show up in -next.
> If Wim takes it into the official watchdog-next tree or not would be
> completely up to him.
>
> I personally don't care if the bindings check is clean in my inofficial
> tree, so maybe this is a non-issue.
That doesn't help, sadly.
I think the best course of action is for Wim to let me know when this
patch makes it into his tree. I'll take the MFD one at the same time
and the two shall meet in -next.
Honestly, this is all such a faff.
Just to keep a script happy that 3 people care about.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: "Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Justin Chen" <justinpopo6@gmail.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:44:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya+BX1X7/YqmfCU8@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a86d5998-8d84-7afe-e34e-a632aa890683@roeck-us.net>
On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 12/7/21 2:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that
> >
> > Not exactly, I said:
> >
> > "> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well.
> >
> > If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch."
> >
> > The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable
> > branch to you, which I am in a position to do.
> >
>
> I understand, only I am not in a position to take it since my tree
> isn't the official watchdog-next tree, and it doesn't show up in -next.
> If Wim takes it into the official watchdog-next tree or not would be
> completely up to him.
>
> I personally don't care if the bindings check is clean in my inofficial
> tree, so maybe this is a non-issue.
That doesn't help, sadly.
I think the best course of action is for Wim to let me know when this
patch makes it into his tree. I'll take the MFD one at the same time
and the two shall meet in -next.
Honestly, this is all such a faff.
Just to keep a script happy that 3 people care about.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-15 5:53 [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema Rafał Miłecki
2021-11-15 5:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-11-15 5:53 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 2/2] dt-bindings: mfd: add Broadcom's Timer-Watchdog block Rafał Miłecki
2021-11-15 5:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-11-18 22:45 ` Rob Herring
2021-11-18 22:45 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-29 9:44 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-29 9:44 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 7:50 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-06 7:50 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-06 8:44 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 8:44 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 8:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-06 8:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-06 9:05 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 9:05 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 17:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 17:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 18:55 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 18:55 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 19:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-06 19:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-06 19:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 19:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 19:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-06 19:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-06 19:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 19:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-06 19:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-06 19:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-07 10:03 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-07 10:03 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-07 15:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-07 15:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-07 15:44 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2021-12-07 15:44 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-28 9:21 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2021-12-28 9:21 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2021-12-29 9:45 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-29 9:45 ` Lee Jones
2021-12-06 21:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-06 21:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ya+BX1X7/YqmfCU8@google.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=justinpopo6@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.