RE: About resctrl code rebase

RE: About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

Hi, James Morse

> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache 
> control function into resctrl. Fujitsu will implement this feature base
> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 
> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ 

> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move 
> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. 
> And where is the rebase code? 
> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng

Re: About resctrl code rebase

[James Morse]

Hi Tan Shaopeng,

On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
>> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache 
>> control function into resctrl.

>> Fujitsu will implement this feature base
>> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 
>> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ 

I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.

I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/

and there are a couple more after that.


>> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move 
>> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. 
>> And where is the rebase code? 
>> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)

I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will
happen this month.


> I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.

Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


Thanks,

James

Re: About resctrl code rebase

[James Morse]

Hi Tan Shaopeng,

On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
>> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache 
>> control function into resctrl.

>> Fujitsu will implement this feature base
>> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 
>> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ 

I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.

I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/

and there are a couple more after that.


>> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move 
>> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. 
>> And where is the rebase code? 
>> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)

I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will
happen this month.


> I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.

Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


Thanks,

James

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

Hi, James Morse

Thanks for your reply.

> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
> 
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> 
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> 
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> 
> and there are a couple more after that.

I understand.
 
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> 
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)

I will check these patches.
And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86. 

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng

> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.
> 
> 
> > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
> 
> Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!

RE: About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

Hi, James Morse

Thanks for your reply.

> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
> 
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> 
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> 
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> 
> and there are a couple more after that.

I understand.
 
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> 
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)

I will check these patches.
And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86. 

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng

> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.
> 
> 
> > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
> 
> Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

Hi James
 
> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
> 
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> 
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> 
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> 
> and there are a couple more after that.

When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this? 
 
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> 
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)
> 
> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.

Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
Is there anything I can do for you?

Best regards,
Tan shaopeng

RE: About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

Hi James
 
> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
> 
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> 
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> 
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> 
> and there are a couple more after that.

When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this? 
 
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> 
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)
> 
> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.

Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
Is there anything I can do for you?

Best regards,
Tan shaopeng

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

Hi James
 
> > On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> > >> cache control function into resctrl.
> >
> > >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> > >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> > >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.
> > >> ti
> > >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> >
> > I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> >
> > I've also posted the next series here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.co
> > m
> > /
> >
> > and there are a couple more after that.
> 
> When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this?
> 
> > >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> > >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> > >> And where is the rebase code?
> > >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> >
> > I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the
> > earlier part is reviewed.
> > (please help!)
> >
> > I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I
> > hope that will happen this month.
> 
> Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
> Is there anything I can do for you?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,
Tan shaopeng

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: About resctrl code rebase

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 07:58:28AM +0000, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Hi James
>  
> > > On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > > >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> > > >> cache control function into resctrl.
> > >
> > > >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> > > >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> > > >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.
> > > >> ti
> > > >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> > >
> > > I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> > >
> > > I've also posted the next series here:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.co
> > > m
> > > /
> > >
> > > and there are a couple more after that.
> > 
> > When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this?
> > 
> > > >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> > > >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> > > >> And where is the rebase code?
> > > >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> > >
> > > I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the
> > > earlier part is reviewed.
> > > (please help!)
> > >
> > > I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I
> > > hope that will happen this month.
> > 
> > Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
> > Is there anything I can do for you?
> 
> I look forward to hearing from you.

There's a branch published here[1].

Rob

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/log/?h=mpam/snapshot/v5.15

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

Hi Rob,

> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 07:58:28AM +0000, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > Hi James
> >
> > > > On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > > > >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add
> > > > >> A64FX's cache control function into resctrl.
> > > >
> > > > >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code.
> > > > >> I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of
> > > > >> resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> > > > >>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.
> > > > >> ti
> > > > >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> > > >
> > > > I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> > > >
> > > > I've also posted the next series here:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@ar
> > > > m.co
> > > > m
> > > > /
> > > >
> > > > and there are a couple more after that.
> > >
> > > When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this?
> > >
> > > > >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that
> > > > >> move the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> > > > >> And where is the rebase code?
> > > > >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> > > >
> > > > I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the
> > > > earlier part is reviewed.
> > > > (please help!)
> > > >
> > > > I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published,
> > > > but I hope that will happen this month.
> > >
> > > Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
> > > Is there anything I can do for you?
> >
> > I look forward to hearing from you.
> 
> There's a branch published here[1].
> 
> Rob
> 
> [1]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/log/?h=mpa
> m/snapshot/v5.15

Thank you very much.
It is very helpful to my work.

One more question,
Could you tell me when you plan to post these codes?

Best regards,
Shaopeng Tan



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

Hi Rob,


> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 07:58:28AM +0000, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > > Hi James
> > >
> > > > > On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > > > > >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add
> > > > > >> A64FX's cache control function into resctrl.
> > > > >
> > > > > >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code.
> > > > > >> I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of
> > > > > >> resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> > > > > >>
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.
> > > > > >> ti
> > > > > >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've also posted the next series here:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@
> > > > > ar
> > > > > m.co
> > > > > m
> > > > > /
> > > > >
> > > > > and there are a couple more after that.
> > > >
> > > > When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after
> this?
> > > >
> > > > > >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes
> > > > > >> that move the common parts of multiple architectures to
> somewhere.
> > > > > >> And where is the rebase code?
> > > > > >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> > > > >
> > > > > I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the
> > > > > earlier part is reviewed.
> > > > > (please help!)
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published,
> > > > > but I hope that will happen this month.
> > > >
> > > > Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code?
> > > > Is there anything I can do for you?
> > >
> > > I look forward to hearing from you.
> >
> > There's a branch published here[1].
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > [1]
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/log/?h
> > =mpa
> > m/snapshot/v5.15
> 
Could you tell me when will you post these codes on kernel development community?

Best regards
Tan Shaopeng

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

About resctrl code rebase

[tan.shaopeng]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 639 bytes --]

Hi, James Morse

As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache
control function into resctrl. Fujitsu will implement this feature base
on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86
implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/

I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
And where is the rebase code?
In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3895 bytes --]