From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] spi: dt-bindings: Describe stacked/parallel memories modes
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:32:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbjVSNAC8M5Y1nHp@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211210201039.729961-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:10:38PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Describe two new memories modes:
> - A stacked mode when the bus is common but the address space extended
> with an additinals wires.
> - A parallel mode with parallel busses accessing parallel flashes where
> the data is spread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> index 5dd209206e88..4194fee8f556 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> @@ -82,6 +82,35 @@ properties:
> description:
> Delay, in microseconds, after a write transfer.
>
> + stacked-memories:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint64-matrix
matrix or...
> + description: Several SPI memories can be wired in stacked mode.
> + This basically means that either a device features several chip
> + selects, or that different devices must be seen as a single
> + bigger chip. This basically doubles (or more) the total address
> + space with only a single additional wire, while still needing
> + to repeat the commands when crossing a chip boundary. The size of
> + each chip should be provided as members of the array.
array?
Sounds like an array from the description as there is only 1 element,
the size.
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
> + items:
> + maxItems: 1
This says you can only have 2 64-bit entries. Probably not what you
want. This looks like a case for a maxItems 'should be enough for now'
type of value.
> +
> + parallel-memories:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint64-matrix
> + description: Several SPI memories can be wired in parallel mode.
> + The devices are physically on a different buses but will always
> + act synchronously as each data word is spread across the
> + different memories (eg. even bits are stored in one memory, odd
> + bits in the other). This basically doubles the address space and
> + the throughput while greatly complexifying the wiring because as
> + many busses as devices must be wired. The size of each chip should
> + be provided as members of the array.
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
> + items:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> # The controller specific properties go here.
> allOf:
> - $ref: cdns,qspi-nor-peripheral-props.yaml#
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] spi: dt-bindings: Describe stacked/parallel memories modes
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:32:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbjVSNAC8M5Y1nHp@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211210201039.729961-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:10:38PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Describe two new memories modes:
> - A stacked mode when the bus is common but the address space extended
> with an additinals wires.
> - A parallel mode with parallel busses accessing parallel flashes where
> the data is spread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> index 5dd209206e88..4194fee8f556 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> @@ -82,6 +82,35 @@ properties:
> description:
> Delay, in microseconds, after a write transfer.
>
> + stacked-memories:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint64-matrix
matrix or...
> + description: Several SPI memories can be wired in stacked mode.
> + This basically means that either a device features several chip
> + selects, or that different devices must be seen as a single
> + bigger chip. This basically doubles (or more) the total address
> + space with only a single additional wire, while still needing
> + to repeat the commands when crossing a chip boundary. The size of
> + each chip should be provided as members of the array.
array?
Sounds like an array from the description as there is only 1 element,
the size.
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
> + items:
> + maxItems: 1
This says you can only have 2 64-bit entries. Probably not what you
want. This looks like a case for a maxItems 'should be enough for now'
type of value.
> +
> + parallel-memories:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint64-matrix
> + description: Several SPI memories can be wired in parallel mode.
> + The devices are physically on a different buses but will always
> + act synchronously as each data word is spread across the
> + different memories (eg. even bits are stored in one memory, odd
> + bits in the other). This basically doubles the address space and
> + the throughput while greatly complexifying the wiring because as
> + many busses as devices must be wired. The size of each chip should
> + be provided as members of the array.
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
> + items:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> # The controller specific properties go here.
> allOf:
> - $ref: cdns,qspi-nor-peripheral-props.yaml#
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 20:10 [PATCH v4 0/3] Stacked/parallel memories bindings Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 20:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 20:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: mtd: spi-nor: Allow two CS per device Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 20:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 20:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] spi: dt-bindings: Describe stacked/parallel memories modes Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 20:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-14 17:32 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-12-14 17:32 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-16 15:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-16 15:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-10 8:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-10 8:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-21 15:54 ` Rob Herring
2022-01-21 15:54 ` Rob Herring
2022-01-26 11:18 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-01-26 11:18 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-14 19:44 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-14 19:44 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-16 16:25 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-16 16:25 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 12:39 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-17 12:39 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-17 12:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 12:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 20:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] spi: dt-bindings: Add an example with two stacked flashes Miquel Raynal
2021-12-10 20:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-14 17:37 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-14 17:37 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbjVSNAC8M5Y1nHp@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.