From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Yael Tiomkin <yaelt@google.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, zohar@linux.ibm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] syscalls/keyctl09: test encrypted keys.
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:01:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YcGYAhskkG1r+5Qs@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211221023721.129689-1-yaelt@google.com>
Hi Yael,
you still have some problem when running more iterations:
./keyctl09 -i500
keyctl09.c:49: TPASS: Encrypted keys were successfully instantiated and read
keyctl09.c:49: TPASS: Encrypted keys were successfully instantiated and read
...
keyctl09.c:33: TFAIL: Failed to instantiate encrypted key using payload decrypted data
(some people really try high number of iterations.)
Could you please have a look?
> Test that encrypted keys can be instantiated using
> both user-provided decrypted data
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20211213192030.125091-1-yaelt@google.com/),
> or kernel-generated numbers.
+1 for doc!
...
> +static void do_test(void)
> +{
> + key_serial_t masterkey;
> + key_serial_t encryptedkey1;
> + key_serial_t encryptedkey2;
> + char buffer[128];
> +
> + masterkey = add_key("user", "user:masterkey", "foo", 3,
> + KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
> + if (masterkey == -1)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to add user key");
> +
> + encryptedkey1 = add_key("encrypted", "ltptestkey1", ENCRYPTED_KEY_1_PAYLOAD,
> + 60, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
> + if (encryptedkey1 == -1)
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "Failed to instantiate encrypted key using payload decrypted data");
nit: this might be TBROK (test preparation phase), not sure
(and not that important).
The rest LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Yael Tiomkin <yaelt@google.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/keyctl09: test encrypted keys.
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:01:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YcGYAhskkG1r+5Qs@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211221023721.129689-1-yaelt@google.com>
Hi Yael,
you still have some problem when running more iterations:
./keyctl09 -i500
keyctl09.c:49: TPASS: Encrypted keys were successfully instantiated and read
keyctl09.c:49: TPASS: Encrypted keys were successfully instantiated and read
...
keyctl09.c:33: TFAIL: Failed to instantiate encrypted key using payload decrypted data
(some people really try high number of iterations.)
Could you please have a look?
> Test that encrypted keys can be instantiated using
> both user-provided decrypted data
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20211213192030.125091-1-yaelt@google.com/),
> or kernel-generated numbers.
+1 for doc!
...
> +static void do_test(void)
> +{
> + key_serial_t masterkey;
> + key_serial_t encryptedkey1;
> + key_serial_t encryptedkey2;
> + char buffer[128];
> +
> + masterkey = add_key("user", "user:masterkey", "foo", 3,
> + KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
> + if (masterkey == -1)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to add user key");
> +
> + encryptedkey1 = add_key("encrypted", "ltptestkey1", ENCRYPTED_KEY_1_PAYLOAD,
> + 60, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
> + if (encryptedkey1 == -1)
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "Failed to instantiate encrypted key using payload decrypted data");
nit: this might be TBROK (test preparation phase), not sure
(and not that important).
The rest LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-21 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-21 2:37 [PATCH v2] syscalls/keyctl09: test encrypted keys Yael Tiomkin
2021-12-21 2:37 ` [LTP] " Yael Tiomkin via ltp
2021-12-21 9:01 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2021-12-21 9:01 ` Petr Vorel
2021-12-21 9:21 ` Nageswara Sastry
2021-12-21 9:21 ` [LTP] " Nageswara Sastry
2021-12-21 10:48 ` Petr Vorel
2021-12-21 10:48 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-12-22 5:11 ` Nageswara Sastry
2021-12-22 5:11 ` [LTP] " Nageswara Sastry
2021-12-22 9:10 ` Petr Vorel
2021-12-22 9:10 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-12-22 15:14 ` Eric Biggers
2021-12-22 15:14 ` [LTP] " Eric Biggers
2021-12-22 15:33 ` Eric Biggers
2021-12-22 15:33 ` [LTP] " Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YcGYAhskkG1r+5Qs@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=yaelt@google.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.