All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@us.ibm.com>,
	Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vineet Singh <vineet.singh@intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	zhengjun.xing@intel.com, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/48] perf cpumap: Switch cpu_map__build_map to cpu function
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:12:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd2eQiPIvEf0c42x@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YdzSKOWJRC0dRnSn@kernel.org>

Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:41:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 1:34 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:23:09PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:03:04PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > > Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:46:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > > > At this point we need to remove the now unused perf_env__get_cpu(), and
> > > > > > then deal with the fallout in the following patches that needlessly
> > > > > > modify this unused function.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Doing that now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Done, force pushed to tmp.perf/perf_cpu, now it is going again thru the
> > > > > build containers, a better start now:
> > >
> > > > So far so good:
> > >
> > > perf test ok, just that one that is failing, but before this series as
> > > well:
> > >
> > >  89: perf all metricgroups test                                      : FAILED!
> > 
> > Could you add the verbose output? I suspect it is fixed by this:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211223183948.3423989-1-irogers@google.com/
> 
> I'll try it.
> 
> BTW, here are the final tests, problems with arm 32 and 64-bit, I'll go thru
> them tomorrow, to fix in the cset the problem appears, so that we keep it
> bisectable, else you can get what I have in tmp.perf/perf_cpu, fix it and
> tomorrow I'll retest.
> 
>   27    85.67 debian:11                     : Ok   gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110 , Debian clang version 11.0.1-2
>   28    98.65 debian:experimental           : Ok   gcc (Debian 11.2.0-13) 11.2.0 , Debian clang version 13.0.0-9+b2
>   29     8.69 debian:experimental-x-arm64   : FAIL gcc version 11.2.0 (Debian 11.2.0-9)
>     arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function 'pmu_events_map__find':
>     arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:18:35: error: invalid operands to binary != (have 'int' and 'struct perf_cpu')
>        18 |                 if (pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu())
>           |                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           |                              |       |
>           |                              int     struct perf_cpu
>     make[5]: *** [/git/perf-5.16.0/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: util] Error 2
>     make[4]: *** [/git/perf-5.16.0/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arm64] Error 2
>     make[3]: *** [/git/perf-5.16.0/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arch] Error 2
>   30    19.15 debian:experimental-x-mips    : Ok   mips-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110

Fixed with the patch below squashed into 48/48 where the problem
was introduced.

tmp.perf/perf_cpu updated.

[perfbuilder@five ~]$ dm debian:experimental-x-arm64 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm  ubuntu:18.04-x-arm64
   1    26.08 debian:experimental-x-arm64   : Ok   aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 11.2.0-9) 11.2.0
   2    21.68 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm            : Ok   arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609
   3    21.53 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64          : Ok   aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609
   4    61.22 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm            : Ok   arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0
   5   108.41 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm64          : Ok   aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0
BUILD_TARBALL_HEAD=5610e6f0b9e64a02dfc906c9db9d18fd198200d9
 6 238.918
[perfbuilder@five ~]$

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
index 129c0272d65b8596..2e8b2c4365a0003f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
@@ -203,9 +203,11 @@ static int cs_etm_set_option(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
 	struct perf_cpu_map *online_cpus = perf_cpu_map__new(NULL);
 
 	/* Set option of each CPU we have */
-	for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu(); i++) {
-		if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, i) ||
-		    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
+	for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
+		struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+		if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu) ||
+		    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
 			continue;
 
 		if (option & BIT(ETM_OPT_CTXTID)) {
@@ -522,9 +524,11 @@ cs_etm_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
 
 	/* cpu map is not empty, we have specific CPUs to work with */
 	if (!perf_cpu_map__empty(event_cpus)) {
-		for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu(); i++) {
-			if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, i) ||
-			    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
+		for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
+			struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+			if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu) ||
+			    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
 				continue;
 
 			if (cs_etm_is_ete(itr, i))
@@ -536,8 +540,10 @@ cs_etm_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* get configuration for all CPUs in the system */
-		for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu(); i++) {
-			if (!perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
+		for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
+			struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+			if (!perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
 				continue;
 
 			if (cs_etm_is_ete(itr, i))
@@ -722,8 +728,10 @@ static int cs_etm_info_fill(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
 	} else {
 		/* Make sure all specified CPUs are online */
 		for (i = 0; i < perf_cpu_map__nr(event_cpus); i++) {
-			if (perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, i) &&
-			    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
+			struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+			if (perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu) &&
+			    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
 				return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
@@ -743,9 +751,12 @@ static int cs_etm_info_fill(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
 
 	offset = CS_ETM_SNAPSHOT + 1;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu() && offset < priv_size; i++)
-		if (perf_cpu_map__has(cpu_map, i))
+	for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu && offset < priv_size; i++) {
+		struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+		if (perf_cpu_map__has(cpu_map, cpu))
 			cs_etm_get_metadata(i, &offset, itr, info);
+	}
 
 	perf_cpu_map__put(online_cpus);
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
index d3a18f9c85f6a731..79124bba713e5f0d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ const struct pmu_events_map *pmu_events_map__find(void)
 		 * The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
 		 * not support some events or have different event IDs.
 		 */
-		if (pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu())
+		if (pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
 			return NULL;
 
 		return perf_pmu__find_map(pmu);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@us.ibm.com>,
	Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vineet Singh <vineet.singh@intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	zhengjun.xing@intel.com, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/48] perf cpumap: Switch cpu_map__build_map to cpu function
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:12:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd2eQiPIvEf0c42x@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YdzSKOWJRC0dRnSn@kernel.org>

Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:41:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 1:34 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:23:09PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:03:04PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > > Em Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:46:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > > > At this point we need to remove the now unused perf_env__get_cpu(), and
> > > > > > then deal with the fallout in the following patches that needlessly
> > > > > > modify this unused function.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Doing that now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Done, force pushed to tmp.perf/perf_cpu, now it is going again thru the
> > > > > build containers, a better start now:
> > >
> > > > So far so good:
> > >
> > > perf test ok, just that one that is failing, but before this series as
> > > well:
> > >
> > >  89: perf all metricgroups test                                      : FAILED!
> > 
> > Could you add the verbose output? I suspect it is fixed by this:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211223183948.3423989-1-irogers@google.com/
> 
> I'll try it.
> 
> BTW, here are the final tests, problems with arm 32 and 64-bit, I'll go thru
> them tomorrow, to fix in the cset the problem appears, so that we keep it
> bisectable, else you can get what I have in tmp.perf/perf_cpu, fix it and
> tomorrow I'll retest.
> 
>   27    85.67 debian:11                     : Ok   gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110 , Debian clang version 11.0.1-2
>   28    98.65 debian:experimental           : Ok   gcc (Debian 11.2.0-13) 11.2.0 , Debian clang version 13.0.0-9+b2
>   29     8.69 debian:experimental-x-arm64   : FAIL gcc version 11.2.0 (Debian 11.2.0-9)
>     arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function 'pmu_events_map__find':
>     arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:18:35: error: invalid operands to binary != (have 'int' and 'struct perf_cpu')
>        18 |                 if (pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu())
>           |                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           |                              |       |
>           |                              int     struct perf_cpu
>     make[5]: *** [/git/perf-5.16.0/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: util] Error 2
>     make[4]: *** [/git/perf-5.16.0/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arm64] Error 2
>     make[3]: *** [/git/perf-5.16.0/tools/build/Makefile.build:139: arch] Error 2
>   30    19.15 debian:experimental-x-mips    : Ok   mips-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110

Fixed with the patch below squashed into 48/48 where the problem
was introduced.

tmp.perf/perf_cpu updated.

[perfbuilder@five ~]$ dm debian:experimental-x-arm64 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm  ubuntu:18.04-x-arm64
   1    26.08 debian:experimental-x-arm64   : Ok   aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 11.2.0-9) 11.2.0
   2    21.68 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm            : Ok   arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609
   3    21.53 ubuntu:16.04-x-arm64          : Ok   aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609
   4    61.22 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm            : Ok   arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0
   5   108.41 ubuntu:18.04-x-arm64          : Ok   aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0
BUILD_TARBALL_HEAD=5610e6f0b9e64a02dfc906c9db9d18fd198200d9
 6 238.918
[perfbuilder@five ~]$

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
index 129c0272d65b8596..2e8b2c4365a0003f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
@@ -203,9 +203,11 @@ static int cs_etm_set_option(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
 	struct perf_cpu_map *online_cpus = perf_cpu_map__new(NULL);
 
 	/* Set option of each CPU we have */
-	for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu(); i++) {
-		if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, i) ||
-		    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
+	for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
+		struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+		if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu) ||
+		    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
 			continue;
 
 		if (option & BIT(ETM_OPT_CTXTID)) {
@@ -522,9 +524,11 @@ cs_etm_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
 
 	/* cpu map is not empty, we have specific CPUs to work with */
 	if (!perf_cpu_map__empty(event_cpus)) {
-		for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu(); i++) {
-			if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, i) ||
-			    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
+		for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
+			struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+			if (!perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu) ||
+			    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
 				continue;
 
 			if (cs_etm_is_ete(itr, i))
@@ -536,8 +540,10 @@ cs_etm_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* get configuration for all CPUs in the system */
-		for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu(); i++) {
-			if (!perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
+		for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu; i++) {
+			struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+			if (!perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
 				continue;
 
 			if (cs_etm_is_ete(itr, i))
@@ -722,8 +728,10 @@ static int cs_etm_info_fill(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
 	} else {
 		/* Make sure all specified CPUs are online */
 		for (i = 0; i < perf_cpu_map__nr(event_cpus); i++) {
-			if (perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, i) &&
-			    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, i))
+			struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+			if (perf_cpu_map__has(event_cpus, cpu) &&
+			    !perf_cpu_map__has(online_cpus, cpu))
 				return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
@@ -743,9 +751,12 @@ static int cs_etm_info_fill(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
 
 	offset = CS_ETM_SNAPSHOT + 1;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu() && offset < priv_size; i++)
-		if (perf_cpu_map__has(cpu_map, i))
+	for (i = 0; i < cpu__max_cpu().cpu && offset < priv_size; i++) {
+		struct perf_cpu cpu = { .cpu = i, };
+
+		if (perf_cpu_map__has(cpu_map, cpu))
 			cs_etm_get_metadata(i, &offset, itr, info);
+	}
 
 	perf_cpu_map__put(online_cpus);
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
index d3a18f9c85f6a731..79124bba713e5f0d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ const struct pmu_events_map *pmu_events_map__find(void)
 		 * The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
 		 * not support some events or have different event IDs.
 		 */
-		if (pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu())
+		if (pmu->cpus->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
 			return NULL;
 
 		return perf_pmu__find_map(pmu);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-11 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 130+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-30  7:19 [PATCH v3 00/48] Refactor perf cpumap Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 01/48] libperf: Add comments to perf_cpu_map Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3] perf evlist: Remove group option Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-04 14:21   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04 14:21     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04 17:01     ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-04 17:01       ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/48] perf stat: Add aggr creators that are passed a cpu Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/48] perf stat: Correct aggregation CPU map Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-04 14:19   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04 14:19     ` Jiri Olsa
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 04/48] perf stat: Switch aggregation to use for_each loop Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/48] perf stat: Switch to cpu version of cpu_map__get Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/48] perf cpumap: Switch cpu_map__build_map to cpu function Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-10 20:46   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-10 20:46     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-10 21:03     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-10 21:03       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-10 21:23       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-10 21:23         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-10 21:34         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-10 21:34           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-10 22:29           ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-10 22:29             ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-11  0:41             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-11  0:41               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-11  0:50               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-11  0:50                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-11 15:12               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-01-11 15:12                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/48] perf cpumap: Remove map+index get_socket Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/48] perf cpumap: Remove map+index get_die Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-04 14:19   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04 14:19     ` Jiri Olsa
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/48] perf cpumap: Remove map+index get_core Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/48] perf cpumap: Remove map+index get_node Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 11/48] perf cpumap: Add comments to aggr_cpu_id Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 12/48] perf cpumap: Remove unused cpu_map__socket Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 13/48] perf cpumap: Simplify equal function name Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 14/48] perf cpumap: Rename empty functions Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 15/48] perf cpumap: Document cpu__get_node and remove redundant function Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 16/48] perf cpumap: Remove map from function names that don't use a map Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19 ` [PATCH v3 17/48] perf cpumap: Remove cpu_map__cpu, use libperf function Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:19   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 18/48] perf cpumap: Refactor cpu_map__build_map Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-04 14:20   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04 14:20     ` Jiri Olsa
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 19/48] perf cpumap: Rename cpu_map__get_X_aggr_by_cpu functions Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 20/48] perf cpumap: Move 'has' function to libperf Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 21/48] perf cpumap: Add some comments to cpu_aggr_map Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 22/48] perf cpumap: Trim the cpu_aggr_map Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 23/48] perf stat: Fix memory leak in check_per_pkg Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 24/48] perf cpumap: Add CPU to aggr_cpu_id Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 25/48] perf stat-display: Avoid use of core for CPU Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 26/48] perf evsel: Derive CPUs and threads in alloc_counts Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 27/48] libperf: Switch cpu to more accurate cpu_map_idx Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 28/48] libperf: Use cpu not index for evsel mmap Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 29/48] perf counts: Switch name cpu to cpu_map_idx Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 30/48] perf stat: Rename aggr_data cpu to imply it's an index Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 31/48] perf stat: Use perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 32/48] perf script: Use for each cpu to aid readability Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 33/48] libperf: Allow NULL in perf_cpu_map__idx Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 34/48] perf evlist: Refactor evlist__for_each_cpu Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 35/48] perf evsel: Pass cpu not cpu map index to synthesize Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 36/48] perf stat: Correct variable name for read counter Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 37/48] perf evsel: Rename CPU around get_group_fd Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 38/48] perf evsel: Reduce scope of evsel__ignore_missing_thread Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 39/48] perf evsel: Rename variable cpu to index Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 40/48] perf test: Use perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 41/48] perf stat: Correct check_per_pkg cpu Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 42/48] perf stat: Swap variable name cpu to index Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 43/48] libperf: Sync evsel documentation Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 44/48] perf bpf: Rename cpu to cpu_map_idx Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 45/48] perf c2c: Use more intention revealing iterator Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 46/48] perf script: Fix flipped index and cpu Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 47/48] perf stat: Correct first_shadow_cpu to return index Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20 ` [PATCH v3 48/48] perf cpumap: Give CPUs their own type Ian Rogers
2021-12-30  7:20   ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v3 00/48] Refactor perf cpumap Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04 14:24   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04 17:08   ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-04 17:08     ` Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yd2eQiPIvEf0c42x@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rickyman7@gmail.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vineet.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.