From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"quic_qiancai@quicinc.com" <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"gshan@redhat.com" <gshan@redhat.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64/mm: avoid fixmap race condition when create pud mapping
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:34:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfKRVJlWrgluqD9e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca62449b-7ab0-0e18-ee5a-b46b3f527385@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:22:47PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Yes, system_state can roughly separate these callers of __create_pgd_mapping. When system_state > SYSTEM_BOOTING we can add the lock.
> > Thus, I have the following change:
> >
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swapper_pgdir_lock);
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(fixmap_lock);
> >
> > void set_swapper_pgd(pgd_t *pgdp, pgd_t pgd)
> > {
> > @@ -329,6 +330,8 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > }
> > BUG_ON(p4d_bad(p4d));
> >
> > + if (system_state > SYSTEM_BOOTING)
>
> As there is nothing smaller than SYSTEM_BOOTING, you can use
> if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
>
> ...
>
> >
> > It seems work and somehow simper. But I don't know if it is reasonable to do this. So, any idea? @Ard Biesheuvel @Catalin Marinas
>
> It's worth looking at kernel/notifier.c, e.g.,
> blocking_notifier_chain_register()
>
> if (unlikely(system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING))
> return notifier_chain_register(&nh->head, n);
>
> down_write(&nh->rwsem);
> ret = notifier_chain_register(&nh->head, n);
> up_write(&nh->rwsem);
>
> If we decide to go down that path, we should make sure to add a comment like
>
> /*
> * No need for locking during early boot. And it doesn't work as
> * expected with KASLR enabled where we might clear BSS twice.
> */
A similar approach sounds fine to me.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"quic_qiancai@quicinc.com" <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"gshan@redhat.com" <gshan@redhat.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64/mm: avoid fixmap race condition when create pud mapping
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:34:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfKRVJlWrgluqD9e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca62449b-7ab0-0e18-ee5a-b46b3f527385@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:22:47PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Yes, system_state can roughly separate these callers of __create_pgd_mapping. When system_state > SYSTEM_BOOTING we can add the lock.
> > Thus, I have the following change:
> >
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swapper_pgdir_lock);
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(fixmap_lock);
> >
> > void set_swapper_pgd(pgd_t *pgdp, pgd_t pgd)
> > {
> > @@ -329,6 +330,8 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > }
> > BUG_ON(p4d_bad(p4d));
> >
> > + if (system_state > SYSTEM_BOOTING)
>
> As there is nothing smaller than SYSTEM_BOOTING, you can use
> if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
>
> ...
>
> >
> > It seems work and somehow simper. But I don't know if it is reasonable to do this. So, any idea? @Ard Biesheuvel @Catalin Marinas
>
> It's worth looking at kernel/notifier.c, e.g.,
> blocking_notifier_chain_register()
>
> if (unlikely(system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING))
> return notifier_chain_register(&nh->head, n);
>
> down_write(&nh->rwsem);
> ret = notifier_chain_register(&nh->head, n);
> up_write(&nh->rwsem);
>
> If we decide to go down that path, we should make sure to add a comment like
>
> /*
> * No need for locking during early boot. And it doesn't work as
> * expected with KASLR enabled where we might clear BSS twice.
> */
A similar approach sounds fine to me.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-16 8:28 [PATCH v3] arm64/mm: avoid fixmap race condition when create pud mapping Jianyong Wu
2021-12-16 8:28 ` Jianyong Wu
2021-12-16 15:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-16 15:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-17 9:30 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-17 9:30 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-17 10:09 ` Jianyong Wu
2021-12-17 10:09 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-05 18:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-05 18:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-06 10:13 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-06 10:13 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-06 15:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-06 15:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-07 9:10 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-07 9:10 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-07 10:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-07 10:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-26 4:20 ` Justin He
2022-01-26 4:20 ` Justin He
2022-01-26 8:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-26 8:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-26 10:09 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-26 10:09 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-26 10:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-26 10:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-26 10:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 10:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 10:28 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-26 10:28 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-26 10:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 10:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 10:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 10:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-27 6:24 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-27 6:24 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-27 12:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-27 12:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-27 12:34 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-01-27 12:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-31 8:13 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-31 8:13 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-31 8:10 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-31 8:10 ` Jianyong Wu
2022-01-27 1:31 ` Justin He
2022-01-27 1:31 ` Justin He
2022-01-07 10:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-07 10:53 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfKRVJlWrgluqD9e@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com \
--cc=Jianyong.Wu@arm.com \
--cc=Justin.He@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.