All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:11:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfRcC/ggq90jw7Uc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127114249.03b1b52b@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:42:49AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> First S390 complained that the sorting of the mcount sections at build
> time caused the kernel to crash on their architecture. Now PowerPC is
> complaining about it too. And also ARM64 appears to be having issues.
>
> It may be necessary to also update the relocation table for the values
> in the mcount table. Not only do we have to sort the table, but also
> update the relocations that may be applied to the items in the table.
>
> If the system is not relocatable, then it is fine to sort, but if it is,
> some architectures may have issues (although x86 does not as it shifts all
> addresses the same).
>
> Add a HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT that an architecture can set to say it is
> safe to do the sorting at build time.
>
> Also update the config to compile in build time sorting in the sorttable
> code in scripts/ to depend on CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/944D10DA-8200-4BA9-8D0A-3BED9AA99F82@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 72b3942a173c ("scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig     | 1 +
>  arch/x86/Kconfig     | 1 +
>  kernel/trace/Kconfig | 8 +++++++-
>  scripts/Makefile     | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index c2724d986fa0..5256ebe57451 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config ARM
>  	select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32
>  	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
>  	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
> +	select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK if !XIP_KERNEL
>  	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if MMU
>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 7399327d1eff..46080dea5dba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ config X86
>  	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK	if HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
>  	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
>  	select HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT		if STACK_VALIDATION
> +	select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
>  	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> index 752ed89a293b..7e5b92090faa 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> @@ -70,10 +70,16 @@ config HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
>  	help
>  	  C version of recordmcount available?
>
> +config HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
> +       bool
> +       help
> +         An architecture selects this if it sorts the mcount_loc section
> +	 at build time.
> +
>  config BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>         bool
>         default y
> -       depends on BUILDTIME_TABLE_SORT && !S390
> +       depends on HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>         help
>           Sort the mcount_loc section at build time.
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile b/scripts/Makefile
> index b082d2f93357..cedc1f0e21d8 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -I$(srctree)/tools/arch/x86/include
>  HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DUNWINDER_ORC_ENABLED
>  endif
>
> -ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> +ifdef CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DMCOUNT_SORT_ENABLED
>  endif
>
> --
> 2.33.0
>

Hi Steve,

I just finished bisecting what is probably the same problem... when
running the livepatch selftests for 5.17-rc1, x86_64 passes, but I kept
getting errors like this on ppc64le:

  kernel: livepatch: enabling patch 'test_klp_livepatch'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to find location for function 'cmdline_proc_show'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to patch object 'vmlinux'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to enable patch 'test_klp_livepatch'
  kernel: livepatch: 'test_klp_livepatch': unpatching complete

which means klp_get_ftrace_location() / ftrace_location_range() hit a
problem with that function.

The bisect finally landed on:

  72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777 is the first bad commit
  commit 72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777
  Author: Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>
  Date:   Sun Dec 12 19:33:58 2021 +0800

      scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init

and I can confirm that your updates today in "[for-linus][PATCH 00/10]
tracing: Fixes for 5.17-rc1" fix or avoid the issue.  I just wanted to
add my report in case this adds any future complications for mcount
build time sorting.  Let me know if any additional tests would be
helpful.

Regards,

-- Joe


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:11:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfRcC/ggq90jw7Uc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127114249.03b1b52b@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:42:49AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> First S390 complained that the sorting of the mcount sections at build
> time caused the kernel to crash on their architecture. Now PowerPC is
> complaining about it too. And also ARM64 appears to be having issues.
>
> It may be necessary to also update the relocation table for the values
> in the mcount table. Not only do we have to sort the table, but also
> update the relocations that may be applied to the items in the table.
>
> If the system is not relocatable, then it is fine to sort, but if it is,
> some architectures may have issues (although x86 does not as it shifts all
> addresses the same).
>
> Add a HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT that an architecture can set to say it is
> safe to do the sorting at build time.
>
> Also update the config to compile in build time sorting in the sorttable
> code in scripts/ to depend on CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/944D10DA-8200-4BA9-8D0A-3BED9AA99F82@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 72b3942a173c ("scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig     | 1 +
>  arch/x86/Kconfig     | 1 +
>  kernel/trace/Kconfig | 8 +++++++-
>  scripts/Makefile     | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index c2724d986fa0..5256ebe57451 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config ARM
>  	select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32
>  	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
>  	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
> +	select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK if !XIP_KERNEL
>  	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if MMU
>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 7399327d1eff..46080dea5dba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ config X86
>  	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK	if HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
>  	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
>  	select HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT		if STACK_VALIDATION
> +	select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
>  	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> index 752ed89a293b..7e5b92090faa 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> @@ -70,10 +70,16 @@ config HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
>  	help
>  	  C version of recordmcount available?
>
> +config HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
> +       bool
> +       help
> +         An architecture selects this if it sorts the mcount_loc section
> +	 at build time.
> +
>  config BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>         bool
>         default y
> -       depends on BUILDTIME_TABLE_SORT && !S390
> +       depends on HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>         help
>           Sort the mcount_loc section at build time.
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile b/scripts/Makefile
> index b082d2f93357..cedc1f0e21d8 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -I$(srctree)/tools/arch/x86/include
>  HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DUNWINDER_ORC_ENABLED
>  endif
>
> -ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> +ifdef CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DMCOUNT_SORT_ENABLED
>  endif
>
> --
> 2.33.0
>

Hi Steve,

I just finished bisecting what is probably the same problem... when
running the livepatch selftests for 5.17-rc1, x86_64 passes, but I kept
getting errors like this on ppc64le:

  kernel: livepatch: enabling patch 'test_klp_livepatch'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to find location for function 'cmdline_proc_show'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to patch object 'vmlinux'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to enable patch 'test_klp_livepatch'
  kernel: livepatch: 'test_klp_livepatch': unpatching complete

which means klp_get_ftrace_location() / ftrace_location_range() hit a
problem with that function.

The bisect finally landed on:

  72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777 is the first bad commit
  commit 72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777
  Author: Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>
  Date:   Sun Dec 12 19:33:58 2021 +0800

      scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init

and I can confirm that your updates today in "[for-linus][PATCH 00/10]
tracing: Fixes for 5.17-rc1" fix or avoid the issue.  I just wanted to
add my report in case this adds any future complications for mcount
build time sorting.  Let me know if any additional tests would be
helpful.

Regards,

-- Joe


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:11:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfRcC/ggq90jw7Uc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127114249.03b1b52b@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:42:49AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> First S390 complained that the sorting of the mcount sections at build
> time caused the kernel to crash on their architecture. Now PowerPC is
> complaining about it too. And also ARM64 appears to be having issues.
>
> It may be necessary to also update the relocation table for the values
> in the mcount table. Not only do we have to sort the table, but also
> update the relocations that may be applied to the items in the table.
>
> If the system is not relocatable, then it is fine to sort, but if it is,
> some architectures may have issues (although x86 does not as it shifts all
> addresses the same).
>
> Add a HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT that an architecture can set to say it is
> safe to do the sorting at build time.
>
> Also update the config to compile in build time sorting in the sorttable
> code in scripts/ to depend on CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/944D10DA-8200-4BA9-8D0A-3BED9AA99F82@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 72b3942a173c ("scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig     | 1 +
>  arch/x86/Kconfig     | 1 +
>  kernel/trace/Kconfig | 8 +++++++-
>  scripts/Makefile     | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index c2724d986fa0..5256ebe57451 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config ARM
>  	select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32
>  	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
>  	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
> +	select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK if !XIP_KERNEL
>  	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if MMU
>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 7399327d1eff..46080dea5dba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ config X86
>  	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK	if HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
>  	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
>  	select HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT		if STACK_VALIDATION
> +	select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
>  	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> index 752ed89a293b..7e5b92090faa 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> @@ -70,10 +70,16 @@ config HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
>  	help
>  	  C version of recordmcount available?
>
> +config HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
> +       bool
> +       help
> +         An architecture selects this if it sorts the mcount_loc section
> +	 at build time.
> +
>  config BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>         bool
>         default y
> -       depends on BUILDTIME_TABLE_SORT && !S390
> +       depends on HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>         help
>           Sort the mcount_loc section at build time.
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile b/scripts/Makefile
> index b082d2f93357..cedc1f0e21d8 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -I$(srctree)/tools/arch/x86/include
>  HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DUNWINDER_ORC_ENABLED
>  endif
>
> -ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> +ifdef CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
>  HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DMCOUNT_SORT_ENABLED
>  endif
>
> --
> 2.33.0
>

Hi Steve,

I just finished bisecting what is probably the same problem... when
running the livepatch selftests for 5.17-rc1, x86_64 passes, but I kept
getting errors like this on ppc64le:

  kernel: livepatch: enabling patch 'test_klp_livepatch'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to find location for function 'cmdline_proc_show'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to patch object 'vmlinux'
  kernel: livepatch: failed to enable patch 'test_klp_livepatch'
  kernel: livepatch: 'test_klp_livepatch': unpatching complete

which means klp_get_ftrace_location() / ftrace_location_range() hit a
problem with that function.

The bisect finally landed on:

  72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777 is the first bad commit
  commit 72b3942a173c387b27860ba1069636726e208777
  Author: Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>
  Date:   Sun Dec 12 19:33:58 2021 +0800

      scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init

and I can confirm that your updates today in "[for-linus][PATCH 00/10]
tracing: Fixes for 5.17-rc1" fix or avoid the issue.  I just wanted to
add my report in case this adds any future complications for mcount
build time sorting.  Let me know if any additional tests would be
helpful.

Regards,

-- Joe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-28 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-27 16:42 [PATCH] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting Steven Rostedt
2022-01-27 16:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-27 16:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-27 18:23 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 18:23   ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 18:23   ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 18:42   ` ftrace hangs waiting for rcu (was: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting) Sven Schnelle
2022-01-27 18:42     ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-27 18:42     ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-28 15:42     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-28 15:42       ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-28 15:42       ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-28 16:08       ` ftrace hangs waiting for rcu Sven Schnelle
2022-01-28 16:08         ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-28 16:08         ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-28 16:11         ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-28 16:11           ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-28 16:11           ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-28 16:15           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-28 16:15             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-28 16:15             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-28 17:47             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-28 17:47               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-28 17:47               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-28 16:17           ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-28 16:17             ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-28 16:17             ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-28 21:11 ` Joe Lawrence [this message]
2022-01-28 21:11   ` [PATCH] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting Joe Lawrence
2022-01-28 21:11   ` Joe Lawrence
2022-01-28 21:39   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-28 21:39     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-28 21:39     ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfRcC/ggq90jw7Uc@redhat.com \
    --to=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yinan@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.