From: Ming Lei <ming.lei-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
yi.zhang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] block: cancel all throttled bios in del_gendisk()
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:39:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgMbaqTD+ycFPAtM@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208113808.1401601-1-yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 07:38:08PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Throttled bios can't be issued after del_gendisk() is done, thus
> it's better to cancel them immediately rather than waiting for
> throttle is done.
>
> For example, if user thread is throttled with low bps while it's
> issuing large io, and the device is deleted. The user thread will
> wait for a long time for io to return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Changes in v8:
> - fold two patches into one
> Changes in v7:
> - use the new solution as suggested by Ming.
>
> block/blk-throttle.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> block/blk-throttle.h | 2 ++
> block/genhd.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
> index 7c462c006b26..557d20796157 100644
> --- a/block/blk-throttle.c
> +++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
> @@ -43,8 +43,12 @@
> static struct workqueue_struct *kthrotld_workqueue;
>
> enum tg_state_flags {
> - THROTL_TG_PENDING = 1 << 0, /* on parent's pending tree */
> - THROTL_TG_WAS_EMPTY = 1 << 1, /* bio_lists[] became non-empty */
> + /* on parent's pending tree */
> + THROTL_TG_PENDING = 1 << 0,
> + /* bio_lists[] became non-empty */
> + THROTL_TG_WAS_EMPTY = 1 << 1,
> + /* starts to cancel all bios, will be set if the disk is deleted */
> + THROTL_TG_CANCELING = 1 << 2,
> };
>
> #define rb_entry_tg(node) rb_entry((node), struct throtl_grp, rb_node)
> @@ -871,7 +875,8 @@ static bool tg_may_dispatch(struct throtl_grp *tg, struct bio *bio,
> bio != throtl_peek_queued(&tg->service_queue.queued[rw]));
>
> /* If tg->bps = -1, then BW is unlimited */
> - if (bps_limit == U64_MAX && iops_limit == UINT_MAX) {
> + if ((bps_limit == U64_MAX && iops_limit == UINT_MAX) ||
> + tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING) {
> if (wait)
> *wait = 0;
> return true;
> @@ -974,6 +979,9 @@ static void tg_update_disptime(struct throtl_grp *tg)
> unsigned long read_wait = -1, write_wait = -1, min_wait = -1, disptime;
> struct bio *bio;
>
> + if (tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING)
> + goto update;
> +
> bio = throtl_peek_queued(&sq->queued[READ]);
> if (bio)
> tg_may_dispatch(tg, bio, &read_wait);
> @@ -983,9 +991,10 @@ static void tg_update_disptime(struct throtl_grp *tg)
> tg_may_dispatch(tg, bio, &write_wait);
>
> min_wait = min(read_wait, write_wait);
> - disptime = jiffies + min_wait;
>
> +update:
> /* Update dispatch time */
> + disptime = jiffies + min_wait;
As I mentioned on V7, the change in tg_update_disptime() isn't needed, please
drop it.
> throtl_dequeue_tg(tg);
> tg->disptime = disptime;
> throtl_enqueue_tg(tg);
> @@ -1763,6 +1772,38 @@ static bool throtl_hierarchy_can_upgrade(struct throtl_grp *tg)
> return false;
> }
>
> +void blk_throtl_cancel_bios(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
> + struct blkcg_gq *blkg;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
> + /*
> + * queue_lock is held, rcu lock is not needed here technically.
> + * However, rcu lock is still held to emphasize that following
> + * path need RCU protection and to prevent warning from lockdep.
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + blkg_for_each_descendant_post(blkg, pos_css, q->root_blkg) {
> + struct throtl_grp *tg = blkg_to_tg(blkg);
> + struct throtl_service_queue *sq = &tg->service_queue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set disptime in the past to make sure
> + * throtl_select_dispatch() won't exit without dispatching.
> + */
> + tg->disptime = jiffies - 1;
It might be better to replace the above line with tg_update_disptime().
Otherwise, the patch looks good.
Thanks,
Ming
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] block: cancel all throttled bios in del_gendisk()
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:39:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgMbaqTD+ycFPAtM@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208113808.1401601-1-yukuai3@huawei.com>
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 07:38:08PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Throttled bios can't be issued after del_gendisk() is done, thus
> it's better to cancel them immediately rather than waiting for
> throttle is done.
>
> For example, if user thread is throttled with low bps while it's
> issuing large io, and the device is deleted. The user thread will
> wait for a long time for io to return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changes in v8:
> - fold two patches into one
> Changes in v7:
> - use the new solution as suggested by Ming.
>
> block/blk-throttle.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> block/blk-throttle.h | 2 ++
> block/genhd.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
> index 7c462c006b26..557d20796157 100644
> --- a/block/blk-throttle.c
> +++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
> @@ -43,8 +43,12 @@
> static struct workqueue_struct *kthrotld_workqueue;
>
> enum tg_state_flags {
> - THROTL_TG_PENDING = 1 << 0, /* on parent's pending tree */
> - THROTL_TG_WAS_EMPTY = 1 << 1, /* bio_lists[] became non-empty */
> + /* on parent's pending tree */
> + THROTL_TG_PENDING = 1 << 0,
> + /* bio_lists[] became non-empty */
> + THROTL_TG_WAS_EMPTY = 1 << 1,
> + /* starts to cancel all bios, will be set if the disk is deleted */
> + THROTL_TG_CANCELING = 1 << 2,
> };
>
> #define rb_entry_tg(node) rb_entry((node), struct throtl_grp, rb_node)
> @@ -871,7 +875,8 @@ static bool tg_may_dispatch(struct throtl_grp *tg, struct bio *bio,
> bio != throtl_peek_queued(&tg->service_queue.queued[rw]));
>
> /* If tg->bps = -1, then BW is unlimited */
> - if (bps_limit == U64_MAX && iops_limit == UINT_MAX) {
> + if ((bps_limit == U64_MAX && iops_limit == UINT_MAX) ||
> + tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING) {
> if (wait)
> *wait = 0;
> return true;
> @@ -974,6 +979,9 @@ static void tg_update_disptime(struct throtl_grp *tg)
> unsigned long read_wait = -1, write_wait = -1, min_wait = -1, disptime;
> struct bio *bio;
>
> + if (tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING)
> + goto update;
> +
> bio = throtl_peek_queued(&sq->queued[READ]);
> if (bio)
> tg_may_dispatch(tg, bio, &read_wait);
> @@ -983,9 +991,10 @@ static void tg_update_disptime(struct throtl_grp *tg)
> tg_may_dispatch(tg, bio, &write_wait);
>
> min_wait = min(read_wait, write_wait);
> - disptime = jiffies + min_wait;
>
> +update:
> /* Update dispatch time */
> + disptime = jiffies + min_wait;
As I mentioned on V7, the change in tg_update_disptime() isn't needed, please
drop it.
> throtl_dequeue_tg(tg);
> tg->disptime = disptime;
> throtl_enqueue_tg(tg);
> @@ -1763,6 +1772,38 @@ static bool throtl_hierarchy_can_upgrade(struct throtl_grp *tg)
> return false;
> }
>
> +void blk_throtl_cancel_bios(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
> + struct blkcg_gq *blkg;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
> + /*
> + * queue_lock is held, rcu lock is not needed here technically.
> + * However, rcu lock is still held to emphasize that following
> + * path need RCU protection and to prevent warning from lockdep.
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + blkg_for_each_descendant_post(blkg, pos_css, q->root_blkg) {
> + struct throtl_grp *tg = blkg_to_tg(blkg);
> + struct throtl_service_queue *sq = &tg->service_queue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set disptime in the past to make sure
> + * throtl_select_dispatch() won't exit without dispatching.
> + */
> + tg->disptime = jiffies - 1;
It might be better to replace the above line with tg_update_disptime().
Otherwise, the patch looks good.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 11:38 [PATCH v8] block: cancel all throttled bios in del_gendisk() Yu Kuai
2022-02-08 11:38 ` Yu Kuai
[not found] ` <20220208113808.1401601-1-yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-09 1:39 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-02-09 1:39 ` Ming Lei
2022-02-10 11:33 ` yukuai (C)
2022-02-10 11:33 ` yukuai (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgMbaqTD+ycFPAtM@T590 \
--to=ming.lei-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yi.zhang-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yukuai3-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.