From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: cs-etm: No-op refactor of synth opt usage
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:07:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgvBuqxA/FWsNh1d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211152026.GC475776@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Em Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:20:26PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:06:19PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> > sample_branches and sample_instructions are already saved in the
> > synth_opts struct. Other usages like synth_opts.last_branch don't save
> > a value, so make this more consistent by always going through synth_opts
> > and not saving duplicate values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>
> The patch looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: cs-etm: No-op refactor of synth opt usage
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:07:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgvBuqxA/FWsNh1d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211152026.GC475776@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Em Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:20:26PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:06:19PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> > sample_branches and sample_instructions are already saved in the
> > synth_opts struct. Other usages like synth_opts.last_branch don't save
> > a value, so make this more consistent by always going through synth_opts
> > and not saving duplicate values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>
> The patch looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 20:06 [PATCH 1/2] perf: cs-etm: No-op refactor of synth opt usage James Clark
2022-02-10 20:06 ` James Clark
2022-02-10 20:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: cs-etm: Fix corrupt inject files when only last branch option is enabled James Clark
2022-02-10 20:06 ` James Clark
2022-02-11 16:05 ` Leo Yan
2022-02-11 16:05 ` Leo Yan
2022-02-15 15:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-02-15 15:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-02-22 15:49 ` James Clark
2022-02-22 15:49 ` James Clark
2022-02-11 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: cs-etm: No-op refactor of synth opt usage Leo Yan
2022-02-11 15:20 ` Leo Yan
2022-02-15 15:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-02-15 15:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgvBuqxA/FWsNh1d@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.