All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [hnaz-mm:master 272/379] lib/vsprintf.c:991:13: warning: variable 'modbuildid' set but not used
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 19:22:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5yhoW+y9qcn1RM@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220301102448.ff9bf910213d705842a2dd45@linux-foundation.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1230 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:24:48AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >    lib/vsprintf.c: In function 'va_format':
> >    lib/vsprintf.c:1759:9: warning: function 'va_format' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
> >     1759 |         buf += vsnprintf(buf, end > buf ? end - buf : 0, va_fmt->fmt, va);
> >          |         ^~~
> 
> I wonder what this means.

It means the compiler thinks we might want to add:

__attribute__((format(gnu_printf, x, y))) to the function declaration so it
can type-check the arguments.

'format (ARCHETYPE, STRING-INDEX, FIRST-TO-CHECK)'
     The 'format' attribute specifies that a function takes 'printf',
     'scanf', 'strftime' or 'strfmon' style arguments that should be
     type-checked against a format string.  For example, the
     declaration:

          extern int
          my_printf (void *my_object, const char *my_format, ...)
                __attribute__ ((format (printf, 2, 3)));

     causes the compiler to check the arguments in calls to 'my_printf'
     for consistency with the 'printf' style format string argument
     'my_format'.


I haven't looked into this at all and have no idea if we should.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [hnaz-mm:master 272/379] lib/vsprintf.c:991:13: warning: variable 'modbuildid' set but not used
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 19:22:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5yhoW+y9qcn1RM@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220301102448.ff9bf910213d705842a2dd45@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:24:48AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >    lib/vsprintf.c: In function 'va_format':
> >    lib/vsprintf.c:1759:9: warning: function 'va_format' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
> >     1759 |         buf += vsnprintf(buf, end > buf ? end - buf : 0, va_fmt->fmt, va);
> >          |         ^~~
> 
> I wonder what this means.

It means the compiler thinks we might want to add:

__attribute__((format(gnu_printf, x, y))) to the function declaration so it
can type-check the arguments.

'format (ARCHETYPE, STRING-INDEX, FIRST-TO-CHECK)'
     The 'format' attribute specifies that a function takes 'printf',
     'scanf', 'strftime' or 'strfmon' style arguments that should be
     type-checked against a format string.  For example, the
     declaration:

          extern int
          my_printf (void *my_object, const char *my_format, ...)
                __attribute__ ((format (printf, 2, 3)));

     causes the compiler to check the arguments in calls to 'my_printf'
     for consistency with the 'printf' style format string argument
     'my_format'.


I haven't looked into this at all and have no idea if we should.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-01 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-01 12:11 [hnaz-mm:master 272/379] lib/vsprintf.c:991:13: warning: variable 'modbuildid' set but not used kernel test robot
2022-03-01 18:24 ` Andrew Morton
2022-03-01 18:24   ` Andrew Morton
2022-03-01 19:22   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-03-01 19:22     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-02  9:52     ` John Ogness
2022-03-02  9:52       ` John Ogness
2022-03-02 11:52       ` Petr Mladek
2022-03-02 11:52         ` Petr Mladek
2022-03-02  9:56     ` Petr Mladek
2022-03-02  9:56       ` Petr Mladek
2022-03-02 12:07   ` Petr Mladek
2022-03-02 12:07     ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yh5yhoW+y9qcn1RM@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.