Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock

[Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>]

On 03/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2022/3/3 3:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 03/02, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2022/3/2 13:26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > On 03/02, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > ping,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 2022/2/25 11:02, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > On 2022/2/3 22:57, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2022/2/3 9:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 2022/1/29 8:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 01/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 2022/1/28 5:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 01/27, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoted from Jing Xia's report, there is a potential deadlock may happen
> > > > > > > > > > > > > between kworker and checkpoint as below:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [T:writeback]                [T:checkpoint]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - wb_writeback
> > > > > > > > > > > > >       - blk_start_plug
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bio contains NodeA was plugged in writeback threads
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm still trying to understand more precisely. So, how is it possible to
> > > > > > > > > > > > have bio having node write in this current context?
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > IMO, after above blk_start_plug(), it may plug some inode's node page in kworker
> > > > > > > > > > > during writebacking node_inode's data page (which should be node page)?
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Wasn't that added into a different task->plug?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I'm not sure I've got your concern correctly...
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Do you mean NodeA and other IOs from do_writepages() were plugged in
> > > > > > > > > different local plug variables?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I think so.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I guess block plug helper says it doesn't allow to use nested plug, so there
> > > > > > > is only one plug in kworker thread?
> > > > 
> > > > Is there only one kworker thread that flushes node and inode pages?
> > > 
> > > IIRC, =one kworker per block device?
> > 
> > If there's one kworker only, f2fs_write_node_pages() should have flushed its
> > plug?
> 
> No, f2fs_write_node_pages() failed to attach local plug into current->plug due to
> current has attached plug from wb_writeback(), and also, f2fs_write_node_pages()
> will fail to flush current->plug due to its local plug doesn't match current->plug.
> 
> void blk_start_plug_nr_ios()
> {
> 	if (tsk->plug)
> 		return;
> ...
> }
> 
> void blk_finish_plug(struct blk_plug *plug)
> {
> 	if (plug == current->plug) {
> 		__blk_flush_plug(plug, false);
> 		current->plug = NULL;
> 	}
> }

Ah, okay. Now I see. Thanks for the chasing down.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > void blk_start_plug_nr_ios(struct blk_plug *plug, unsigned short nr_ios)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > >        struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >        /*
> > > > > > >         * If this is a nested plug, don't actually assign it.
> > > > > > >         */
> > > > > > >        if (tsk->plug)
> > > > > > >            return;
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Any further comments?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                       - do_writepages  -- sync write inodeB, inc wb_sync_req[DATA]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                        - f2fs_write_data_pages
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                         - f2fs_write_single_data_page -- write last dirty page
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                          - f2fs_do_write_data_page
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                           - set_page_writeback  -- clear page dirty flag and
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                           PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY tag in radix tree
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                           - f2fs_outplace_write_data
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                            - f2fs_update_data_blkaddr
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                             - f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback -- wait NodeA to writeback here
> > > > > > > > > > > > >                          - inode_dec_dirty_pages
> > > > > > > > > > > > >       - writeback_sb_inodes
> > > > > > > > > > > > >        - writeback_single_inode
> > > > > > > > > > > > >         - do_writepages
> > > > > > > > > > > > >          - f2fs_write_data_pages -- skip writepages due to wb_sync_req[DATA]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >           - wbc->pages_skipped += get_dirty_pages() -- PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY is not set but get_dirty_pages() returns one
> > > > > > > > > > > > >        - requeue_inode -- requeue inode to wb->b_dirty queue due to non-zero.pages_skipped
> > > > > > > > > > > > >       - blk_finish_plug
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's try to avoid deadlock condition by forcing unplugging previous bio via
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blk_finish_plug(current->plug) once we'v skipped writeback in writepages()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > due to valid sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA/NODE].
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 687de7f1010c ("f2fs: avoid IO split due to mixed WB_SYNC_ALL and WB_SYNC_NONE")
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jing Xia <jing.xia@unisoc.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > >       fs/f2fs/data.c | 6 +++++-
> > > > > > > > > > > > >       fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 +++++-
> > > > > > > > > > > > >       2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index 76d6fe7b0c8f..932a4c81acaf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -3174,8 +3174,12 @@ static int __f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >           /* to avoid spliting IOs due to mixed WB_SYNC_ALL and WB_SYNC_NONE */
> > > > > > > > > > > > >           if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >               atomic_inc(&sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA]);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -    else if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA]))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +    else if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA])) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +        /* to avoid potential deadlock */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +        if (current->plug)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +            blk_finish_plug(current->plug);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >               goto skip_write;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +    }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >           if (__should_serialize_io(inode, wbc)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > >               mutex_lock(&sbi->writepages);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index 556fcd8457f3..69c6bcaf5aae 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2106,8 +2106,12 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >           if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >               atomic_inc(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE]);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -    else if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE]))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +    else if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[NODE])) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +        /* to avoid potential deadlock */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +        if (current->plug)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +            blk_finish_plug(current->plug);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >               goto skip_write;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +    }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >           trace_f2fs_writepages(mapping->host, wbc, NODE);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.32.0
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > > > > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > > > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel