From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Sean Kelley <skelley@nvidia.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] x86, ACPI: rename init_freq_invariance_cppc to arch_init_invariance_cppc
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:30:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YihzuD9G8IV4/P7m@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jke695COCAkYNOzOcqF7yPPP5p-YPv+E8rOP=qqoVf9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 08 Mar 2022 at 19:22:10 (+0100), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 7:05 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:10 PM Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > init_freq_invariance_cppc() was called in acpi_cppc_processor_probe(),
> > > after CPU performance information and controls were populated from the
> > > per-cpu _CPC objects.
> > >
> > > But these _CPC objects provide information that helps with both CPU
> > > (u-arch) and frequency invariance. Therefore, change the function name
> > > to a more generic one, while adding the arch_ prefix, as this function
> > > is expected to be defined differently by different architectures.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
> > > Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> >
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> That said it will conflict with this series from Rui:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20220214101450.356047-1-ray.huang@amd.com/
>
> applied by me a while ago.
>
> Maybe consider rebasing when this gets to linux-next ->
Will do that!
>
> > and who's expected to pick this up?
>
> -> and then I guess I can pick it up if everybody agrees.
Many thanks, Rafael!
>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> > > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 6 +++---
> > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > > index 2f0b6be8eaab..5ec70f186775 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static inline void arch_set_max_freq_ratio(bool turbo_disabled)
> > >
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > > void init_freq_invariance_cppc(void);
> > > -#define init_freq_invariance_cppc init_freq_invariance_cppc
> > > +#define arch_init_invariance_cppc init_freq_invariance_cppc
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #endif /* _ASM_X86_TOPOLOGY_H */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> > > index 866560cbb082..bfd142ab4e07 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> > > @@ -633,8 +633,8 @@ static bool is_cppc_supported(int revision, int num_ent)
> > > * )
> > > */
> > >
> > > -#ifndef init_freq_invariance_cppc
> > > -static inline void init_freq_invariance_cppc(void) { }
> > > +#ifndef arch_init_invariance_cppc
> > > +static inline void arch_init_invariance_cppc(void) { }
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> > > goto out_free;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - init_freq_invariance_cppc();
> > > + arch_init_invariance_cppc();
> > >
> > > kfree(output.pointer);
> > > return 0;
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Sean Kelley <skelley@nvidia.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] x86, ACPI: rename init_freq_invariance_cppc to arch_init_invariance_cppc
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:30:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YihzuD9G8IV4/P7m@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jke695COCAkYNOzOcqF7yPPP5p-YPv+E8rOP=qqoVf9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 08 Mar 2022 at 19:22:10 (+0100), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 7:05 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:10 PM Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > init_freq_invariance_cppc() was called in acpi_cppc_processor_probe(),
> > > after CPU performance information and controls were populated from the
> > > per-cpu _CPC objects.
> > >
> > > But these _CPC objects provide information that helps with both CPU
> > > (u-arch) and frequency invariance. Therefore, change the function name
> > > to a more generic one, while adding the arch_ prefix, as this function
> > > is expected to be defined differently by different architectures.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
> > > Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> >
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> That said it will conflict with this series from Rui:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20220214101450.356047-1-ray.huang@amd.com/
>
> applied by me a while ago.
>
> Maybe consider rebasing when this gets to linux-next ->
Will do that!
>
> > and who's expected to pick this up?
>
> -> and then I guess I can pick it up if everybody agrees.
Many thanks, Rafael!
>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
> > > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 6 +++---
> > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > > index 2f0b6be8eaab..5ec70f186775 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static inline void arch_set_max_freq_ratio(bool turbo_disabled)
> > >
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > > void init_freq_invariance_cppc(void);
> > > -#define init_freq_invariance_cppc init_freq_invariance_cppc
> > > +#define arch_init_invariance_cppc init_freq_invariance_cppc
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #endif /* _ASM_X86_TOPOLOGY_H */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> > > index 866560cbb082..bfd142ab4e07 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> > > @@ -633,8 +633,8 @@ static bool is_cppc_supported(int revision, int num_ent)
> > > * )
> > > */
> > >
> > > -#ifndef init_freq_invariance_cppc
> > > -static inline void init_freq_invariance_cppc(void) { }
> > > +#ifndef arch_init_invariance_cppc
> > > +static inline void arch_init_invariance_cppc(void) { }
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> > > goto out_free;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - init_freq_invariance_cppc();
> > > + arch_init_invariance_cppc();
> > >
> > > kfree(output.pointer);
> > > return 0;
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-02 18:09 [PATCH v3 0/3] arch_topology, ACPI: populate cpu capacity from CPPC Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-02 18:09 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-02 18:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] x86, ACPI: rename init_freq_invariance_cppc to arch_init_invariance_cppc Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-02 18:09 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-08 18:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-03-08 18:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-03-08 18:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-03-08 18:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-03-09 9:30 ` Ionela Voinescu [this message]
2022-03-09 9:30 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-02 18:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arch_topology: obtain cpu capacity using information from CPPC Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-02 18:09 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-09 9:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-03-09 9:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-03-09 10:21 ` Yicong Yang
2022-03-09 10:21 ` Yicong Yang
2022-03-09 15:37 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-09 15:37 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-10 6:39 ` Yicong Yang
2022-03-10 6:39 ` Yicong Yang
2022-03-10 15:08 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-10 15:08 ` Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-11 8:42 ` Yicong Yang
2022-03-11 8:42 ` Yicong Yang
2022-03-02 18:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64, topology: enable use of init_cpu_capacity_cppc() Ionela Voinescu
2022-03-02 18:09 ` Ionela Voinescu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YihzuD9G8IV4/P7m@arm.com \
--to=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ggherdovich@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=skelley@nvidia.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.