All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [next] arm: Internal error: Oops: 5 PC is at __read_once_word_nocheck
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:09:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yip3GJDbJIYNeg44@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGb_0FNU7capJEDWTZF2OegmZyBphhH8GuNqL7+YYLjZQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:06:17PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 22:50, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 02:55, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 22:18, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ard and Russell,
> > > >
> > > > The boot test pass on linux next-20220310 tag with  KASAN=y on BeagleBoard x15
> > > > device. but LTP cve tests reproduced the reported kernel crash  [1].
> > > > From the available historical data I can confirm that this is an
> > > > intermittent issue on
> > > > BeagleBoard x15 devices.
> > > >
> > > > OTOH, the kernel crash is always reproducible on qemu-arm with KASAN=y
> > > > while booting which has been known to fail for a long time.
> > > >
> > > > From the Ardb tree I have boot tested qemu-arm with KASAN=y the reported
> > > > kernel crash is always reproducible.
> > > >
> > > > The build steps [3] and extra Kconfigs.
> > > >
> > > > - Naresh
> > > > [1] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/4701310
> > > > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/
> > > > [3] https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2661dIAPUjE2DMJvye91He2gus0/tuxmake_reproducer.sh
> > >
> > > Thanks Naresh. I'm having trouble to make sense of this, though. The
> > > linked output log appears to be from a build that lacks my 'ARM:
> > > entry: fix unwinder problems caused by IRQ stacks' patch, as it
> > > doesn't show any occurrences of call_with_stack() on any of the call
> > > stacks.
> > >
> > > Do you have a link to the vmlinux and zImage files for this build?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > vmlinux.xz:  https://builds.tuxbuild.com/26BmIasJnAyCii0SkgbKarkF369/vmlinux.xz
> > zImage: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/26BmIasJnAyCii0SkgbKarkF369/zImage
> > System.map: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/26BmIasJnAyCii0SkgbKarkF369/System.map
> > Build log: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/26BmIasJnAyCii0SkgbKarkF369/
> >
> 
> This kernel does not appear to have
> 
> ARM: unwind: set frame.pc correctly for current-thread unwinding
> ARM: entry: fix unwinder problems caused by IRQ stacks
> ARM: Revert "unwind: dump exception stack from calling frame"
> 
> so it is expected that the same issue is still being observed.
> 
> Could you please try -next with those patches applied?

I concur, from my inspection of the above referenced vmlinux file.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [next] arm: Internal error: Oops: 5 PC is at __read_once_word_nocheck
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:09:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yip3GJDbJIYNeg44@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGb_0FNU7capJEDWTZF2OegmZyBphhH8GuNqL7+YYLjZQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:06:17PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 22:50, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 02:55, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 22:18, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ard and Russell,
> > > >
> > > > The boot test pass on linux next-20220310 tag with  KASAN=y on BeagleBoard x15
> > > > device. but LTP cve tests reproduced the reported kernel crash  [1].
> > > > From the available historical data I can confirm that this is an
> > > > intermittent issue on
> > > > BeagleBoard x15 devices.
> > > >
> > > > OTOH, the kernel crash is always reproducible on qemu-arm with KASAN=y
> > > > while booting which has been known to fail for a long time.
> > > >
> > > > From the Ardb tree I have boot tested qemu-arm with KASAN=y the reported
> > > > kernel crash is always reproducible.
> > > >
> > > > The build steps [3] and extra Kconfigs.
> > > >
> > > > - Naresh
> > > > [1] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/4701310
> > > > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/
> > > > [3] https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2661dIAPUjE2DMJvye91He2gus0/tuxmake_reproducer.sh
> > >
> > > Thanks Naresh. I'm having trouble to make sense of this, though. The
> > > linked output log appears to be from a build that lacks my 'ARM:
> > > entry: fix unwinder problems caused by IRQ stacks' patch, as it
> > > doesn't show any occurrences of call_with_stack() on any of the call
> > > stacks.
> > >
> > > Do you have a link to the vmlinux and zImage files for this build?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > vmlinux.xz:  https://builds.tuxbuild.com/26BmIasJnAyCii0SkgbKarkF369/vmlinux.xz
> > zImage: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/26BmIasJnAyCii0SkgbKarkF369/zImage
> > System.map: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/26BmIasJnAyCii0SkgbKarkF369/System.map
> > Build log: https://builds.tuxbuild.com/26BmIasJnAyCii0SkgbKarkF369/
> >
> 
> This kernel does not appear to have
> 
> ARM: unwind: set frame.pc correctly for current-thread unwinding
> ARM: entry: fix unwinder problems caused by IRQ stacks
> ARM: Revert "unwind: dump exception stack from calling frame"
> 
> so it is expected that the same issue is still being observed.
> 
> Could you please try -next with those patches applied?

I concur, from my inspection of the above referenced vmlinux file.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-09  9:48 [next] arm: Internal error: Oops: 5 PC is at __read_once_word_nocheck Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-09  9:48 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-09 10:37 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 10:37   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 10:46   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 10:46     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 14:07     ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-09 14:07       ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-09 14:44       ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-09 14:44         ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-09 14:57         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 14:57           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 15:06           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 15:06             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 15:10             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 15:10               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 16:38             ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-09 16:38               ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-09 16:47               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 16:47                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 17:11               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 17:11                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 17:43                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 17:43                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 18:48                   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 18:48                     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 19:14                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 19:14                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 19:36                       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 19:36                         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-09 20:42                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-09 20:42                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-10 12:35                           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-10 12:35                             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-10 13:01                             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-10 13:01                               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-10 13:14                               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-10 13:14                                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-10 21:17                                 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-10 21:17                                   ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-10 21:25                                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-10 21:25                                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-10 21:50                                     ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-10 21:50                                       ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-10 22:06                                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-10 22:06                                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-10 22:09                                         ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2022-03-10 22:09                                           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-14  9:01                                           ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-14  9:01                                             ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-03-14  9:02                                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-03-14  9:02                                               ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yip3GJDbJIYNeg44@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.