From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] arm64/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:27:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjjDlajNUdHgOOWM@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321174404.GA11389@willie-the-truck>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 05:44:05PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 04:07:48PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > So the example you gave cannot possibly have that bit set. From what I
> > understand, it should be fine. But I have no real preference: I can also
> > just stick to the original patch, whatever you prefer.
>
> I think I'd prefer to stay on the safe side and stick with bit 2 as you
> originally proposed. If we need to support crazy numbers of swapfiles
> in future then we can revisit the idea of allocating bit 1.
Sounds fine to me. David, feel free to keep my reviewed-by on the
original patch.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] arm64/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:27:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjjDlajNUdHgOOWM@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321174404.GA11389@willie-the-truck>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 05:44:05PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 04:07:48PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > So the example you gave cannot possibly have that bit set. From what I
> > understand, it should be fine. But I have no real preference: I can also
> > just stick to the original patch, whatever you prefer.
>
> I think I'd prefer to stay on the safe side and stick with bit 2 as you
> originally proposed. If we need to support crazy numbers of swapfiles
> in future then we can revisit the idea of allocating bit 1.
Sounds fine to me. David, feel free to keep my reviewed-by on the
original patch.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] arm64/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:27:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjjDlajNUdHgOOWM@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321174404.GA11389@willie-the-truck>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 05:44:05PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 04:07:48PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > So the example you gave cannot possibly have that bit set. From what I
> > understand, it should be fine. But I have no real preference: I can also
> > just stick to the original patch, whatever you prefer.
>
> I think I'd prefer to stay on the safe side and stick with bit 2 as you
> originally proposed. If we need to support crazy numbers of swapfiles
> in future then we can revisit the idea of allocating bit 1.
Sounds fine to me. David, feel free to keep my reviewed-by on the
original patch.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 14:18 [PATCH v1 0/7] mm: COW fixes part 3: reliable GUP R/W FOLL_GET of anonymous pages David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] mm/swap: remember PG_anon_exclusive via a swp pte bit David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: add tests for __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] x86/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] arm64/pgtable: " David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 18:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-16 18:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-16 18:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-17 10:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-17 10:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-17 10:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-17 17:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-17 17:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-17 17:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-18 9:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-18 9:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-18 9:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-18 11:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-18 11:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-18 11:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-18 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-18 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-18 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-21 14:38 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 14:38 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 14:38 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 15:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-21 15:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-21 15:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-21 17:44 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 17:44 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 17:44 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 18:27 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-03-21 18:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-21 18:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-22 9:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-22 9:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-22 9:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] s390/pgtable: " David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 16:21 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-15 16:21 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-15 16:21 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-15 16:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 16:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 16:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 16:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 16:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 16:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 10:56 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-16 10:56 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-16 10:56 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-16 11:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 11:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 11:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 13:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-03-16 13:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-03-16 13:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-03-16 13:27 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-16 13:27 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-16 13:27 ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-16 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-16 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] powerpc/pgtable: remove _PAGE_BIT_SWAP_TYPE for book3s David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] powerpc/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE " David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-18 23:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] mm: COW fixes part 3: reliable GUP R/W FOLL_GET of anonymous pages Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-18 23:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-18 23:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-19 11:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-19 11:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-19 11:17 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjjDlajNUdHgOOWM@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=oded.gabbay@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pedrodemargomes@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangliang5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.