All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 19/19] drm/edid: sunset drm_find_cea_extension()
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:36:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjtMkddPzskdi3oJ@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <091dcecb74a14b2cb618f2fc494fd0b52bf535b2.1647985054.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:40:48PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Convert drm_find_cea_extension() to a predicate function to check if the
> EDID has a CEA extension or a DisplayID CTA data block. This is mainly
> to avoid adding new users that only find the first CEA extension.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index dfaa21f00941..84314b65b75b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -3422,30 +3422,29 @@ const u8 *drm_find_edid_extension(const struct edid *edid,
>  	return edid_ext;
>  }
>  
> -static const u8 *drm_find_cea_extension(const struct edid *edid)
> +/* Return true if the EDID has a CEA extension or a DisplayID CTA data block */
> +static bool drm_edid_has_cea_extension(const struct edid *edid)
>  {
>  	const struct displayid_block *block;
>  	struct displayid_iter iter;
> -	const u8 *cea;
>  	int ext_index = 0;
> +	bool found = false;
>  
>  	/* Look for a top level CEA extension block */
> -	/* FIXME: make callers iterate through multiple CEA ext blocks? */
> -	cea = drm_find_edid_extension(edid, CEA_EXT, &ext_index);
> -	if (cea)
> -		return cea;
> +	if (drm_find_edid_extension(edid, CEA_EXT, &ext_index))
> +		return true;
>  
>  	/* CEA blocks can also be found embedded in a DisplayID block */
>  	displayid_iter_edid_begin(edid, &iter);
>  	displayid_iter_for_each(block, &iter) {
>  		if (block->tag == DATA_BLOCK_CTA) {
> -			cea = (const u8 *)block;
> +			found = true;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
>  	displayid_iter_end(&iter);
>  
> -	return cea;
> +	return found;
>  }
>  
>  static __always_inline const struct drm_display_mode *cea_mode_for_vic(u8 vic)
> @@ -3715,7 +3714,7 @@ add_alternate_cea_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid)
>  	int modes = 0;
>  
>  	/* Don't add CEA modes if the CEA extension block is missing */
> -	if (!drm_find_cea_extension(edid))
> +	if (!drm_edid_has_cea_extension(edid))

I'm thinking we could just do
if (modes)
	modes += add_alternate_cea_modes(...);
at the end of add_cea_modes().

Or perhaps
if (found)
	modes += add_alternate_cea_modes(...);
if we think that adding the alternate modes would be apporpriate
even when add_cea_modes() didn't add anything. Not sure.

Yes, that would still introduce a sligth change in behaviour
in case we have a CEA ext block/DisplayID CTA block without
any of the video/hdmi/y420vdb blocks, but that edge case
doesn't feel like a deal-breaker to me.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 19/19] drm/edid: sunset drm_find_cea_extension()
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:36:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjtMkddPzskdi3oJ@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <091dcecb74a14b2cb618f2fc494fd0b52bf535b2.1647985054.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:40:48PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Convert drm_find_cea_extension() to a predicate function to check if the
> EDID has a CEA extension or a DisplayID CTA data block. This is mainly
> to avoid adding new users that only find the first CEA extension.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index dfaa21f00941..84314b65b75b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -3422,30 +3422,29 @@ const u8 *drm_find_edid_extension(const struct edid *edid,
>  	return edid_ext;
>  }
>  
> -static const u8 *drm_find_cea_extension(const struct edid *edid)
> +/* Return true if the EDID has a CEA extension or a DisplayID CTA data block */
> +static bool drm_edid_has_cea_extension(const struct edid *edid)
>  {
>  	const struct displayid_block *block;
>  	struct displayid_iter iter;
> -	const u8 *cea;
>  	int ext_index = 0;
> +	bool found = false;
>  
>  	/* Look for a top level CEA extension block */
> -	/* FIXME: make callers iterate through multiple CEA ext blocks? */
> -	cea = drm_find_edid_extension(edid, CEA_EXT, &ext_index);
> -	if (cea)
> -		return cea;
> +	if (drm_find_edid_extension(edid, CEA_EXT, &ext_index))
> +		return true;
>  
>  	/* CEA blocks can also be found embedded in a DisplayID block */
>  	displayid_iter_edid_begin(edid, &iter);
>  	displayid_iter_for_each(block, &iter) {
>  		if (block->tag == DATA_BLOCK_CTA) {
> -			cea = (const u8 *)block;
> +			found = true;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
>  	displayid_iter_end(&iter);
>  
> -	return cea;
> +	return found;
>  }
>  
>  static __always_inline const struct drm_display_mode *cea_mode_for_vic(u8 vic)
> @@ -3715,7 +3714,7 @@ add_alternate_cea_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid)
>  	int modes = 0;
>  
>  	/* Don't add CEA modes if the CEA extension block is missing */
> -	if (!drm_find_cea_extension(edid))
> +	if (!drm_edid_has_cea_extension(edid))

I'm thinking we could just do
if (modes)
	modes += add_alternate_cea_modes(...);
at the end of add_cea_modes().

Or perhaps
if (found)
	modes += add_alternate_cea_modes(...);
if we think that adding the alternate modes would be apporpriate
even when add_cea_modes() didn't add anything. Not sure.

Yes, that would still introduce a sligth change in behaviour
in case we have a CEA ext block/DisplayID CTA block without
any of the video/hdmi/y420vdb blocks, but that edge case
doesn't feel like a deal-breaker to me.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-23 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-22 21:40 [Intel-gfx] [RFC 00/19] drm/edid: overhaul CEA data block iteration Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/19] drm/edid: add drm_edid_extension_block_count() and drm_edid_size() Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 15:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 02/19] drm: use " Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 15:24   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-23 15:24     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 03/19] drm/edid: clean up CEA data block tag definitions Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 15:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 04/19] drm/edid: add iterator for EDID base and extension blocks Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 05/19] drm/edid: add iterator for CEA data blocks Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 16:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-23 16:05     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 06/19] drm/edid: clean up cea_db_is_*() functions Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 15:43   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-23 17:26     ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 07/19] drm/edid: convert add_cea_modes() to use cea db iter Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 08/19] drm/edid: convert drm_edid_to_speaker_allocation() " Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 09/19] drm/edid: convert drm_edid_to_sad() " Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 16:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-23 16:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 10/19] drm/edid: convert drm_detect_hdmi_monitor() " Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 11/19] drm/edid: convert drm_detect_monitor_audio() " Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 12/19] drm/edid: convert drm_parse_cea_ext() " Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 13/19] drm/edid: convert drm_edid_to_eld() " Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 14/19] drm/edid: sunset the old unused cea data block iterators Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 15/19] drm/edid: restore some type safety to cea_db_*() functions Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 16/19] drm/edid: detect basic audio only on CEA extension Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 17/19] drm/edid: detect color formats and CEA revision " Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 18/19] drm/edid: skip CEA extension scan in drm_edid_to_eld() just for CEA rev Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 19/19] drm/edid: sunset drm_find_cea_extension() Jani Nikula
2022-03-22 21:40   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 16:36   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-03-23 16:36     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-22 22:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: overhaul CEA data block iteration Patchwork
2022-03-22 22:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-22 22:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-22 22:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-23  7:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-03-23 16:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 00/19] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-23 16:38   ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YjtMkddPzskdi3oJ@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.