From: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
To: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: tianzichen@kuaishou.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
fannaihao@baidu.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
luodaowen.backend@bytedance.com, gerry@linux.alibaba.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 19/20] erofs: implement fscache-based data readahead
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:36:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yk72+uwwg3/bG72X@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406075612.60298-20-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:56:11PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> Implement fscache-based data readahead. Also registers an individual
> bdi for each erofs instance to enable readahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/fscache.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/erofs/super.c | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/fscache.c b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> index d32cb5840c6d..620d44210809 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> @@ -148,12 +148,106 @@ static int erofs_fscache_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static inline void erofs_fscache_unlock_folios(struct readahead_control *rac,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + while (len) {
> + struct folio *folio = readahead_folio(rac);
> +
> + len -= folio_size(folio);
> + folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void erofs_fscache_readahead(struct readahead_control *rac)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = rac->mapping->host;
> + struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> + size_t len, count, done = 0;
> + erofs_off_t pos;
> + loff_t start, offset;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!readahead_count(rac))
> + return;
> +
> + start = readahead_pos(rac);
> + len = readahead_length(rac);
> +
> + do {
> + struct erofs_map_blocks map;
> + struct erofs_map_dev mdev;
> +
> + pos = start + done;
> + map.m_la = pos;
> +
> + ret = erofs_map_blocks(inode, &map, EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * 1) For CHUNK_BASED layout, the output m_la is rounded down to
> + * the nearest chunk boundary, and the output m_llen actually
> + * starts from the start of the containing chunk.
> + * 2) For other cases, the output m_la is equal to o_la.
> + */
I think such comment is really unneeded, we should calculate like below
as always. Also I don't find o_la here anymore.
> + offset = start + done;
> + count = min_t(size_t, map.m_llen - (pos - map.m_la), len - done);
> +
> + /* Read-ahead Hole */
> + if (!(map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_MAPPED)) {
> + struct iov_iter iter;
> +
> + iov_iter_xarray(&iter, READ, &rac->mapping->i_pages,
> + offset, count);
> + iov_iter_zero(count, &iter);
> +
> + erofs_fscache_unlock_folios(rac, count);
> + ret = count;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Read-ahead Inline */
Unnecessary comment.
> + if (map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_META) {
> + struct folio *folio = readahead_folio(rac);
> +
> + ret = erofs_fscache_readpage_inline(folio, &map);
> + if (!ret) {
> + folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + ret = folio_size(folio);
> + }
> +
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Read-ahead No-inline */
Same here.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> + mdev = (struct erofs_map_dev) {
> + .m_deviceid = map.m_deviceid,
> + .m_pa = map.m_pa,
> + };
> + ret = erofs_map_dev(sb, &mdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = erofs_fscache_read_folios(mdev.m_fscache->cookie,
> + rac->mapping, offset, count,
> + mdev.m_pa + (pos - map.m_la));
> + if (!ret) {
> + erofs_fscache_unlock_folios(rac, count);
> + ret = count;
> + }
> + } while (ret > 0 && ((done += ret) < len));
> +}
> +
> static const struct address_space_operations erofs_fscache_meta_aops = {
> .readpage = erofs_fscache_meta_readpage,
> };
>
> const struct address_space_operations erofs_fscache_access_aops = {
> .readpage = erofs_fscache_readpage,
> + .readahead = erofs_fscache_readahead,
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> index 8c7181cd37e6..a5e4de60a0d8 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,10 @@ static int erofs_fc_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> sbi->opt.fsid, true);
> if (err)
> return err;
> +
> + err = super_setup_bdi(sb);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> }
>
> err = erofs_read_superblock(sb);
> --
> 2.27.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
To: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, xiang@kernel.org,
chao@kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
willy@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com,
tao.peng@linux.alibaba.com, gerry@linux.alibaba.com,
eguan@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
luodaowen.backend@bytedance.com, tianzichen@kuaishou.com,
fannaihao@baidu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 19/20] erofs: implement fscache-based data readahead
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:36:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yk72+uwwg3/bG72X@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406075612.60298-20-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:56:11PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> Implement fscache-based data readahead. Also registers an individual
> bdi for each erofs instance to enable readahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/fscache.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/erofs/super.c | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/fscache.c b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> index d32cb5840c6d..620d44210809 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> @@ -148,12 +148,106 @@ static int erofs_fscache_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static inline void erofs_fscache_unlock_folios(struct readahead_control *rac,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + while (len) {
> + struct folio *folio = readahead_folio(rac);
> +
> + len -= folio_size(folio);
> + folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void erofs_fscache_readahead(struct readahead_control *rac)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = rac->mapping->host;
> + struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> + size_t len, count, done = 0;
> + erofs_off_t pos;
> + loff_t start, offset;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!readahead_count(rac))
> + return;
> +
> + start = readahead_pos(rac);
> + len = readahead_length(rac);
> +
> + do {
> + struct erofs_map_blocks map;
> + struct erofs_map_dev mdev;
> +
> + pos = start + done;
> + map.m_la = pos;
> +
> + ret = erofs_map_blocks(inode, &map, EROFS_GET_BLOCKS_RAW);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * 1) For CHUNK_BASED layout, the output m_la is rounded down to
> + * the nearest chunk boundary, and the output m_llen actually
> + * starts from the start of the containing chunk.
> + * 2) For other cases, the output m_la is equal to o_la.
> + */
I think such comment is really unneeded, we should calculate like below
as always. Also I don't find o_la here anymore.
> + offset = start + done;
> + count = min_t(size_t, map.m_llen - (pos - map.m_la), len - done);
> +
> + /* Read-ahead Hole */
> + if (!(map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_MAPPED)) {
> + struct iov_iter iter;
> +
> + iov_iter_xarray(&iter, READ, &rac->mapping->i_pages,
> + offset, count);
> + iov_iter_zero(count, &iter);
> +
> + erofs_fscache_unlock_folios(rac, count);
> + ret = count;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Read-ahead Inline */
Unnecessary comment.
> + if (map.m_flags & EROFS_MAP_META) {
> + struct folio *folio = readahead_folio(rac);
> +
> + ret = erofs_fscache_readpage_inline(folio, &map);
> + if (!ret) {
> + folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + ret = folio_size(folio);
> + }
> +
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Read-ahead No-inline */
Same here.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> + mdev = (struct erofs_map_dev) {
> + .m_deviceid = map.m_deviceid,
> + .m_pa = map.m_pa,
> + };
> + ret = erofs_map_dev(sb, &mdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = erofs_fscache_read_folios(mdev.m_fscache->cookie,
> + rac->mapping, offset, count,
> + mdev.m_pa + (pos - map.m_la));
> + if (!ret) {
> + erofs_fscache_unlock_folios(rac, count);
> + ret = count;
> + }
> + } while (ret > 0 && ((done += ret) < len));
> +}
> +
> static const struct address_space_operations erofs_fscache_meta_aops = {
> .readpage = erofs_fscache_meta_readpage,
> };
>
> const struct address_space_operations erofs_fscache_access_aops = {
> .readpage = erofs_fscache_readpage,
> + .readahead = erofs_fscache_readahead,
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> index 8c7181cd37e6..a5e4de60a0d8 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,10 @@ static int erofs_fc_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> sbi->opt.fsid, true);
> if (err)
> return err;
> +
> + err = super_setup_bdi(sb);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> }
>
> err = erofs_read_superblock(sb);
> --
> 2.27.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-06 7:55 [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache, erofs: fscache-based on-demand read semantics Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache,erofs: " Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 01/20] cachefiles: unmark inode in use in error path Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 02/20] cachefiles: extract write routine Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-11 12:13 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:13 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:29 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-11 12:29 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 03/20] cachefiles: notify user daemon with anon_fd when looking up cookie Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-11 12:28 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:28 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:36 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-11 12:36 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-11 12:32 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:32 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:36 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-11 12:36 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 04/20] cachefiles: notify user daemon when withdrawing cookie Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-11 12:35 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:35 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:48 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-11 12:48 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-11 13:42 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 13:42 ` David Howells
2022-04-12 3:35 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-12 3:35 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 05/20] cachefiles: implement on-demand read Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-11 12:44 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:44 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 12:50 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-11 12:50 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 06/20] cachefiles: enable on-demand read mode Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 07/20] cachefiles: document " Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:55 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-11 13:38 ` David Howells
2022-04-11 13:38 ` David Howells
2022-04-12 3:17 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-12 3:17 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 08/20] erofs: make erofs_map_blocks() generally available Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 2:44 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 2:44 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 09/20] erofs: add mode checking helper Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 2:46 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 2:46 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 10/20] erofs: register fscache volume Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 2:50 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 2:50 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 11/20] erofs: add fscache context helper functions Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 3:25 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 3:25 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 12/20] erofs: add anonymous inode managing page cache for data blob Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 5:31 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 5:31 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-08 2:14 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 13/20] erofs: add erofs_fscache_read_folios() helper Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 14:05 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 14:05 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 14/20] erofs: register fscache context for primary data blob Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 14:09 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 14:09 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 15/20] erofs: register fscache context for extra data blobs Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 14:15 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 14:15 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-08 2:11 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 16/20] erofs: implement fscache-based metadata read Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 14:19 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 14:19 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 17/20] erofs: implement fscache-based data read for non-inline layout Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 14:24 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 14:24 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 18/20] erofs: implement fscache-based data read for inline layout Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 14:31 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 14:31 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 19/20] erofs: implement fscache-based data readahead Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 14:36 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2022-04-07 14:36 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v8 20/20] erofs: add 'fsid' mount option Jeffle Xu
2022-04-06 7:56 ` Jeffle Xu
2022-04-07 14:39 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-07 14:39 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-10 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache,erofs: fscache-based on-demand read semantics Gao Xiang
2022-04-10 12:51 ` Gao Xiang
2022-04-13 12:27 ` 田子晨
2022-04-13 12:27 ` 田子晨
2022-04-14 8:10 ` Re: [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache, erofs: " Jiachen Zhang
2022-04-14 8:10 ` Re: [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache,erofs: " Jiachen Zhang
2022-04-14 9:29 ` Re: [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache, erofs: " Gao Xiang
2022-04-14 9:29 ` Re: [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache,erofs: " Gao Xiang
2022-04-11 13:43 ` [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache, erofs: " David Howells
2022-04-11 13:43 ` [PATCH v8 00/20] fscache,erofs: " David Howells
2022-04-12 3:18 ` JeffleXu
2022-04-12 3:18 ` JeffleXu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yk72+uwwg3/bG72X@debian \
--to=xiang@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fannaihao@baidu.com \
--cc=gerry@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luodaowen.backend@bytedance.com \
--cc=tianzichen@kuaishou.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.