All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <darren@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	"D . Scott Phillips" <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 19:29:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkupgBs1ybDmofrY@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d58dc946a4fa1cc696d05baad1cf05ae686a86d.1649115057.git.darren@os.amperecomputing.com>

On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 04:40:37PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Ampere Altra defines CPU clusters in the ACPI PPTT. They share a Snoop
> Control Unit, but have no shared CPU-side last level cache.
> 
> cpu_coregroup_mask() will return a cpumask with weight 1, while
> cpu_clustergroup_mask() will return a cpumask with weight 2.
> 
> As a result, build_sched_domain() will BUG() once per CPU with:
> 
> BUG: arch topology borken
> the CLS domain not a subset of the MC domain
> 
> The MC level cpumask is then extended to that of the CLS child, and is
> later removed entirely as redundant. This sched domain topology is an
> improvement over previous topologies, or those built without
> SCHED_CLUSTER, particularly for certain latency sensitive workloads.
> With the current scheduler model and heuristics, this is a desirable
> default topology for Ampere Altra and Altra Max system.
> 
> Rather than create a custom sched domains topology structure and
> introduce new logic in arch/arm64 to detect these systems, update the
> core_mask so coregroup is never a subset of clustergroup, extending it
> to cluster_siblings if necessary. Only do this if CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
> is enabled to avoid also changing the topology (MC) when
> CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is disabled.
> 
> This has the added benefit over a custom topology of working for both
> symmetric and asymmetric topologies. It does not address systems where
> the CLUSTER topology is above a populated MC topology, but these are not
> considered today and can be addressed separately if and when they
> appear.
> 
> The final sched domain topology for a 2 socket Ampere Altra system is
> unchanged with or without CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER, and the BUG is avoided:
> 
> For CPU0:
> 
> CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER=y
> CLS  [0-1]
> DIE  [0-79]
> NUMA [0-159]
> 
> CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is not set
> DIE  [0-79]
> NUMA [0-159]
> 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Cc: D. Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Cc: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Cc: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16.x
> Suggested-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <darren@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> v1: Drop MC level if coregroup weight == 1
> v2: New sd topo in arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> v3: No new topo, extend core_mask to cluster_siblings
> v4: Rebase on 5.18-rc1 for GregKH to pull. Add IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER).

A bit more context on the state of review:

Several folks reviewed, but I didn't add their Reviewed-by since I added the
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER) test since they reviewed it last. This change
preserves the stated intent of the change when CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is disabled.

Barry Song - Suggested this approach
Vincent Guittot - informal review with reservations
Sudeep Holla - Acked-by
Dietmar Eggemann - informal review (added to Cc, apologies for the omission Dietmar)

All but Barry's recommendation captured in the v3 thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/f1deaeabfd31fdf512ff6502f38186ef842c2b1f.1646413117.git.darren@os.amperecomputing.com/

Thanks,

> 
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 1d6636ebaac5..5497c5ab7318 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -667,6 +667,15 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
>  			core_mask = &cpu_topology[cpu].llc_sibling;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * For systems with no shared cpu-side LLC but with clusters defined,
> +	 * extend core_mask to cluster_siblings. The sched domain builder will
> +	 * then remove MC as redundant with CLS if SCHED_CLUSTER is enabled.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER) &&
> +	    cpumask_subset(core_mask, &cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_sibling))
> +		core_mask = &cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_sibling;
> +
>  	return core_mask;
>  }
>  
-- 
Darren Hart
Ampere Computing / OS and Kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-05  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-04 23:40 [PATCH v4] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings Darren Hart
2022-04-05  2:29 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2022-04-05  6:38   ` Barry Song
2022-04-05 14:54     ` Darren Hart
2022-04-06  6:14       ` Barry Song
2022-04-08 18:15         ` Darren Hart
2022-04-05 15:02   ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YkupgBs1ybDmofrY@fedora \
    --to=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.