All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Drop the inline assembly implementation of function_nocfi
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:23:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ykxs8YmNBtst8DM5@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401201916.1487500-4-samitolvanen@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 01:19:16PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Drop the inline assembly version of function_nocfi() now that
> CONFIG_CFI_CLANG depends on __builtin_function_start(), which allows
> this macro to be implemented more cleanly and in a way that works also
> with static initializers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h | 16 ----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

It's very nice to see the asm go here!

I grabbed the LLVM 14.0.0 binary release from llvm.org and gave this a spin. I
tested with ThinLTO and CFI_CLANG, and verified that CPU hotplug and ftrace
worked as expected (given those rely on function_nocfi()), and that the LKDTM
CFI_FORWARD_PROTO caught the mismatched prototype as expected.

FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

As noted on patch 2 I think we should squash the series together, but those
tags apply either way.

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
> index dc3ea4080e2e..6fb2e6bcc392 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
> @@ -23,20 +23,4 @@
>  #define __builtin_return_address(val)					\
>  	(void *)(ptrauth_clear_pac((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(val)))
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
> -/*
> - * With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address
> - * references with the address of the function's CFI jump table
> - * entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the
> - * actual function instead.
> - */
> -#define function_nocfi(x) ({						\
> -	void *addr;							\
> -	asm("adrp %0, " __stringify(x) "\n\t"				\
> -	    "add  %0, %0, :lo12:" __stringify(x)			\
> -	    : "=r" (addr));						\
> -	addr;								\
> -})
> -#endif
> -
>  #endif /* __ASM_COMPILER_H */
> -- 
> 2.35.0
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Drop the inline assembly implementation of function_nocfi
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:23:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ykxs8YmNBtst8DM5@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401201916.1487500-4-samitolvanen@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 01:19:16PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Drop the inline assembly version of function_nocfi() now that
> CONFIG_CFI_CLANG depends on __builtin_function_start(), which allows
> this macro to be implemented more cleanly and in a way that works also
> with static initializers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h | 16 ----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

It's very nice to see the asm go here!

I grabbed the LLVM 14.0.0 binary release from llvm.org and gave this a spin. I
tested with ThinLTO and CFI_CLANG, and verified that CPU hotplug and ftrace
worked as expected (given those rely on function_nocfi()), and that the LKDTM
CFI_FORWARD_PROTO caught the mismatched prototype as expected.

FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

As noted on patch 2 I think we should squash the series together, but those
tags apply either way.

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
> index dc3ea4080e2e..6fb2e6bcc392 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
> @@ -23,20 +23,4 @@
>  #define __builtin_return_address(val)					\
>  	(void *)(ptrauth_clear_pac((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(val)))
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
> -/*
> - * With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address
> - * references with the address of the function's CFI jump table
> - * entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the
> - * actual function instead.
> - */
> -#define function_nocfi(x) ({						\
> -	void *addr;							\
> -	asm("adrp %0, " __stringify(x) "\n\t"				\
> -	    "add  %0, %0, :lo12:" __stringify(x)			\
> -	    : "=r" (addr));						\
> -	addr;								\
> -})
> -#endif
> -
>  #endif /* __ASM_COMPILER_H */
> -- 
> 2.35.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-05 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-01 20:19 [PATCH 0/3] cfi: Use __builtin_function_start Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-01 20:19 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-01 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: Change CFI_CLANG to depend on __builtin_function_start Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-01 20:19   ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-02 13:31   ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-04-02 13:31     ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-04-04 19:40     ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-04 19:40       ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-04 22:52       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-04 22:52         ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-05  2:53         ` Kees Cook
2022-04-05  2:53           ` Kees Cook
2022-04-01 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] linux/compiler-clang.h: define function_nocfi Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-01 20:19   ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-05 16:16   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-05 16:16     ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-01 20:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Drop the inline assembly implementation of function_nocfi Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-01 20:19   ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-04-04  9:03   ` Will Deacon
2022-04-04  9:03     ` Will Deacon
2022-04-05 16:23   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-04-05 16:23     ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-01 20:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] cfi: Use __builtin_function_start Nick Desaulniers
2022-04-01 20:49   ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ykxs8YmNBtst8DM5@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.