From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] block: avoid io timeout in case of sync polled dio
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:00:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YllQVT6n472eUB7+@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415051844.GA22762@lst.de>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 07:18:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 11:47:03AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > + /* make sure the bio is issued before polling */
> > + if (bio.bi_opf & REQ_POLLED)
> > + blk_flush_plug(current->plug, false);
>
> I still think the core code should handle this. Without that we'd need
> to export the blk_flush_plug for anything that would want to poll bios
> from modules, in addition to it generally being a mess. See a proposed
So far there isn't such usage yet. dm calls bio_poll() in ->iopoll(),
and its caller(io_uring) will finish the plug.
> patch for that below. I'd also split the flush aspect from the poll
> aspect into two patches.
>
> > + if (bio.bi_opf & REQ_POLLED)
> > + bio_poll(&bio, NULL, 0);
> > + else
> > blk_io_schedule();
>
> Instead of this duplicate logic everywhere I'd just make bio_boll
> call blk_io_schedule for the !REQ_POLLED case and simplify all the
> callers.
bio_poll() may be called with rcu read lock held, so I'd suggest to
not mix the two together.
>
> > + if (dio->submit.poll_bio &&
> > + (dio->submit.poll_bio->bi_opf &
> > + REQ_POLLED))
>
> This indentation looks awfull,normal would be:
>
> if (dio->submit.poll_bio &&
> (dio->submit.poll_bio->bi_opf & REQ_POLLED))
That follows the indentation style of fs/iomap/direct-io.c for break in
'if'.
>
> ---
> From 08ff61b0142eb708fc384cf867c72175561d974a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 07:15:42 +0200
> Subject: blk-mq: don't plug for synchronously polled requests
>
> For synchronous polling to work, the bio must be issued to the driver from
> the submit_bio call, otherwise ->bi_cookie won't be set.
>
> Based on a patch from Ming Lei.
>
> Reported-by: Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index ed3ed86f7dd24..bcc7e3d11296c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2851,7 +2851,13 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (plug)
> + /*
> + * We can't plug for synchronously polled submissions, otherwise
> + * bio->bi_cookie won't be set directly after submission, which is the
> + * indicator used by the submitter to check if a bio needs polling.
> + */
> + if (plug &&
> + (rq->bio->bi_opf & (REQ_POLLED | REQ_NOWAIT)) != REQ_POLLED)
> blk_add_rq_to_plug(plug, rq);
> else if ((rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV) ||
> (rq->mq_hctx->dispatch_busy &&
It is nothing to do with REQ_NOWAIT. sync polled dio can be marked as
REQ_NOWAIT by userspace too. If '--nowait=1' is added in the fio
reproducer, io timeout is triggered too.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-15 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-15 3:47 [PATCH V2] block: avoid io timeout in case of sync polled dio Ming Lei
2022-04-15 5:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-15 11:00 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-04-16 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-16 9:03 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-18 5:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 8:19 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-19 5:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-19 7:47 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-19 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YllQVT6n472eUB7+@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=czhong@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.